Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add --skip-sanity-check option #4590

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

Flamefire
Copy link
Contributor

For some modules the sanity check command(s) fail when run in the build environment.
This option can be used to still install it and investigate later.

This can currently be done by eb foo.eb && eb foo.eb --module-only --force but I'd argue this option is easier to find and use.

My current use case is testing for easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3386 by installing many modules at once and then intending to do --sanity-check-only for each of them.
Currently the installation of the bulk aborts early. With this option I can install all of them in one go.

For some modules the sanity check command(s) fail when run in the build
environment.
This option can be used to still install it and investigate later.
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Aug 13, 2024
@boegel boegel changed the title Add --skip-sanity-check option Add --skip-sanity-check option Aug 13, 2024
test/framework/options.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@boegel boegel modified the milestones: 4.x, release after 4.9.2 Aug 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel enabled auto-merge August 13, 2024 20:57
@boegel boegel merged commit fe6469e into easybuilders:develop Aug 13, 2024
37 checks passed
@Flamefire Flamefire deleted the skip-sanity-check branch August 14, 2024 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants