code-standards(submit loop): small refactor to submit loop to move timer to submitter thread #1014
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the submission logic in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
partially to address some complaints #1011 (comment) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- block/submit.go (4 hunks)
- block/submit_loop_test.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
block/submit_loop_test.go (2)
118-118: Verify the impact of reducingnParallel.The reduction from 100 to 50 in
nParallelmay improve test stability. Ensure this change doesn't affect the test coverage or objectives.Also applies to: 139-139
Verification successful
Reduction of
nParallelfrom 100 to 50 is likely for stability improvement.The change in
nParallelfrom 100 to 50 appears to be aimed at improving test stability by reducing resource contention without affecting the overall test objectives. The test still adequately covers concurrency behavior with this adjustment.
- Ensure that the test objectives focus on concurrency behavior rather than maximum load to confirm this change is appropriate.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of reducing `nParallel` on test coverage and objectives. # Test: Search for the usage of `nParallel` in the test file. Expect: No adverse impact on test coverage. rg --type go 'nParallel' -A 5Length of output: 1636
102-102: Verify the rationale for increasingabsoluteMax.The change from 1.5 to 2 times
args.maxTimeincreases the allowed time for test execution, which may help accommodate performance variations. Ensure this change aligns with the test objectives and doesn't mask performance issues.Verification successful
Change to
absoluteMaxVerifiedThe increase in
absoluteMaxfrom 1.5 to 2 timesargs.maxTimeprovides additional leeway for test execution time, which can be beneficial in accommodating performance variations across different environments. This change aligns with the test objectives and does not appear to mask performance issues.
- Usage of
absoluteMaxis consistent with ensuring sufficient leeway for execution time and produced bytes.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `absoluteMax` in tests to ensure it aligns with the test objectives. # Test: Search for the usage of `absoluteMax` in the test file. Expect: Alignment with test objectives. rg --type go 'absoluteMax' -A 5Length of output: 1226
block/submit.go (3)
55-56: Improved documentation enhances clarity.The clearer comments on the roles of the goroutines enhance code clarity and maintainability. Ensure comments accurately reflect the logic.
Also applies to: 80-82
80-82: LGTM! Verify ticker usage alignment.The clarified purpose and reset enhance submission timing control. Ensure the ticker usage aligns with the intended submission logic.
Also applies to: 87-87, 91-93, 113-113
Verification successful
Ticker usage aligns with submission logic.
The ticker in
block/submit.gois used to periodically trigger actions and is reset after batch submissions, consistent with the intended timing control. This aligns with the clarified purpose and enhances submission timing.
block/submit.go: Ticker usage within theselectstatement and reset after submission confirms alignment.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the alignment of ticker usage with the intended submission logic. # Test: Search for the ticker usage in the second goroutine. Expect: Alignment with submission logic. rg --type go 'ticker' -A 5Length of output: 3874
55-56: LGTM! Verify back-pressure management.The removal of the ticker simplifies control flow and reduces potential deadlocks. Ensure the logic effectively manages back-pressure without introducing new issues.
Verification successful
Back-pressure management logic appears correct.
The code effectively manages back-pressure by blocking when too much data is pending. Ensure this logic is correctly integrated without introducing new issues.
- Code Location:
block/submit.go
- Condition:
if maxBatchSkew*maxBatchBytes < pendingBytes.Load()Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the effectiveness of back-pressure management in the first goroutine. # Test: Search for the logic managing back-pressure. Expect: No new issues introduced. rg --type go 'back-pressure' -A 5Length of output: 488
| timeLastSubmission := time.Now() | ||
| ticker := time.NewTicker(maxBatchTime / 10) // interval does not need to match max batch time since we keep track anyway, it's just to wakeup |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why submitter needs to just to wakeup?
u should move the maxDataNotExceeded and lastSubmissionIsRecent checks to trigger
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why 'should' I?
You need to actually argue and prove it works
There was a problem hiding this comment.
anyways happy to merge this? because it's an improvement regardless
PR Standards
Opening a pull request should be able to meet the following requirements
--
PR naming convention: https://hackmd.io/@nZpxHZ0CT7O5ngTp0TP9mg/HJP_jrm7A
Close #XXX
<-- Briefly describe the content of this pull request -->
For Author:
godoccommentsFor Reviewer:
After reviewer approval:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests