feat: add async support for csv and dataframe methods

[gosuto-inzasheru]

opening this as a draft to get some feedback.

• add async versions of get_result_csv, _refresh, refresh_csv and refresh_into_dataframe
• reduce diff between client.py and client_async.py, to make future maintenance easier
• make test-all passes 100%

closes #54

[github-actions]

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

[gosuto-inzasheru]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[gosuto-inzasheru]

im a bit out of depth here.

in the basic client, the requests' response is converted to a binary stream using BytesIO:

return ExecutionResultCSV(data=BytesIO(response.content))

however, the asyncio variant of our session returns a StreamReader type response. although a stream, it cannot be handled by pandas' read_csv. currently i was able to solve this as such:

return ExecutionResultCSV(data=BytesIO(await response.content.read(-1)))

but is this really the most efficient way to convert the asynchronous response to something pandas can read?

[gosuto-inzasheru]

client.py versus client_async.py: https://www.diffchecker.com/tXrNtPqY/

[bh2smith]

Hey this looks excellent, really nice job here. I wish there was some way to reduce the overall duplication between the two clients, but I guess not. I have never actually used the async variant and wonder if anyone out there is...

Anyway, this looks great to me!

[bh2smith]

I would be willing to merge as is and we can tag a new release after a few other of the pending/incoming PRs are landed. Just let me know

[gosuto-inzasheru]

@eliseygusev care to comment on the async aspect here maybe?

[gosuto-inzasheru]

i will resolve conflicts and update for updates made to client in #53

[bh2smith]

Were you still planning on resolving conflicts here?

[gosuto-inzasheru]

yes will do, just also have a day job :(

[gosuto-inzasheru]

should be good to merge @bh2smith!

• async client now also supports the performance param as introduced in [WIP] pass performance param & implement "latest results" endpoint #53
• minimised diff again between client.py and client_aync.py: https://www.diffchecker.com/ej06mO8H/

[gosuto-inzasheru]

@bh2smith what is in the way of merging this? i think waiting will just creates more conflicts down the road for other prs...

[bh2smith]

Ya we can merge this... but the performance tier is still failing. Its fine though (aw you explained)

[bh2smith]

Could you also review #59 --- @gosuto-inzasheru? Then I can tag a new release.