Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test case for MonthCalendarDesigner #11692

Conversation

SimonZhao888
Copy link
Member

@SimonZhao888 SimonZhao888 commented Jul 17, 2024

Related to #10773

Proposed changes

  • Add test case for MonthCalendarDesigner.
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.65269%. Comparing base (9319f17) to head (c407733).
Report is 34 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##                main      #11692         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   74.51156%   74.65269%   +0.14113%     
===================================================
  Files           3040        3043          +3     
  Lines         629560      629834        +274     
  Branches       46839       46846          +7     
===================================================
+ Hits          469095      470188       +1093     
+ Misses        157096      156280        -816     
+ Partials        3369        3366          -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
Debug 74.65269% <100.00000%> (+0.14113%) ⬆️
integration 17.96346% <ø> (+0.08488%) ⬆️
production 47.64094% <ø> (+0.23861%) ⬆️
test 96.97848% <100.00000%> (+0.02633%) ⬆️
unit 44.68381% <ø> (+0.16411%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link
Member

@ricardobossan ricardobossan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All LGTM

@lonitra lonitra added the 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Jul 17, 2024
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot removed the 📭 waiting-author-feedback The team requires more information from the author label Jul 18, 2024
Copy link
Member

@lonitra lonitra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you

@lonitra lonitra merged commit ada64f7 into dotnet:main Jul 18, 2024
8 checks passed
@dotnet-policy-service dotnet-policy-service bot added this to the 9.0 Preview7 milestone Jul 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants