dotCMS Fields: create a contenttype fields library

[rjvelazco]

Proposed Changes

• Create a library for contenttype fields

Description

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 4a2fc10

This pull request adds two new apps to the core-web project: contenttype-fields-builder and contenttype-fields-builder-e2e. The former is an Angular app that allows creating and editing custom contenttype fields components, and the latter is a Cypress app that provides end-to-end testing for the former. The pull request also updates the pre-commit hook script to exclude these apps from the linting target, and adds the necessary configuration files for ESLint, Cypress, Nx, Jest, and TypeScript for both apps.

Related Issue

Fixes #25781

Explanation of Changes

🤖 Generated by Copilot at 4a2fc10

• Exclude new apps from linting target in pre-commit hook script (link)

• Add ESLint configuration file with Angular overrides (link)
• Add Jest configuration file with Angular and jest-preset-angular options (link)
• Add Nx project configuration file with build, serve, i18n, lint, and test targets (link)
• Add app component with app title (link)
• Add app component test file with basic test cases (link)
• Add app module file that bootstraps app component and registers custom elements (link)
• Add index HTML file with app root component (link)
• Add ESLint configuration file with Cypress overrides (link)
• Add Cypress configuration file with folder and runner options (link)
• Add Nx project configuration file with e2e and lint targets and dependency on contenttype-fields-builder app (link)
• Add sample fixture file with mock data (link)
• Add sample integration test file with simple test case (link)
• Add plugins file with TypeScript preprocessing (link)
• Add helper function file to get greeting element (link)
• Add custom commands file with login command (link)
• Add support file that imports custom commands file (link)
• Add TypeScript configuration file with Cypress and Angular types and compiler options (link)

[manuelrojas]

@rjvelazco it is looks like the Front-End checks are failing.

[rjvelazco]

Good catch!

[fmontes]

😄

[dotcms-sonarqube]

SonarQube Quality Gate

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[dotcms-sonarqube]

SonarQube Quality Gate

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information