Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allows binding of custom LocaleProviders #67

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

v-antech
Copy link

Extends the current implementation to allow bindings of custom LocaleProviders that may behave differently and not rely (entirely) on the locale provided from the browser. A use case could be to disable some languages for custom domains.

For this to work one has only to override the SitebricksModule#bindLocaleProvider() method with a custom binding.

The new LocaleProvider can be bound to a custom implementation that
does not necessarily use the browser locale. This is useful if the
Locale should be mapped to a specific value for a custom domain name
for example.
The new LocaleProvider can be bound to a custom implementation that
does not necessarily use the browser locale. This is useful if the
Locale should be mapped to a specific value for a custom domain name
for example.
… localeProvider

Conflicts:
	sitebricks/src/main/java/com/google/sitebricks/SitebricksModule.java
	sitebricks/src/main/java/com/google/sitebricks/locale/LocaleProvider.java
	sitebricks/src/main/java/com/google/sitebricks/locale/LocaleProviderImpl.java
@buildhive
Copy link

Dhanji R. Prasanna » sitebricks #185 UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
(what's this?)

Exchanged the HttpServletRequest with the new LocaleProvider.
@buildhive
Copy link

Dhanji R. Prasanna » sitebricks #186 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
(what's this?)

@v-antech
Copy link
Author

Is there any progress on this? Some feedback would be really cool. Thank you!

@v-antech v-antech closed this May 13, 2014
@v-antech v-antech reopened this Sep 16, 2014
@buildhive
Copy link

Dhanji R. Prasanna » sitebricks #194 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
(what's this?)

@buildhive
Copy link

Dhanji R. Prasanna » sitebricks #195 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
(what's this?)

@buildhive
Copy link

Dhanji R. Prasanna » sitebricks #196 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
(what's this?)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants