Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(yaml): add test for block scalars #5187

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2024

Conversation

kt3k
Copy link
Member

@kt3k kt3k commented Jun 28, 2024

This PR adds test of parsing block scalars.

part of #3713

@github-actions github-actions bot added the yaml label Jun 28, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.10%. Comparing base (dc3154c) to head (1f21250).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5187      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.94%   94.10%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         469      469              
  Lines       37894    37896       +2     
  Branches     5447     5466      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits        35598    35663      +65     
+ Misses       2253     2192      -61     
+ Partials       43       41       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@iuioiua iuioiua left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome

@iuioiua iuioiua changed the title test(yaml): add test of block scalars test(yaml): add test for block scalars Jun 28, 2024
@kt3k kt3k merged commit fa48bea into denoland:main Jun 28, 2024
16 checks passed
@kt3k kt3k deleted the test-yaml-block-scalar branch June 28, 2024 10:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants