Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Hygon CPU basic support #126

Closed

Conversation

Avenger-285714
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查报告

代码路径:/Users/username/project/python/example.py

  1. 代码缩进和格式:

    代码中的缩进和格式符合PEP 8代码风格指南,没有发现明显的问题。

  2. 变量命名:

    变量user_inputsecret_number的命名清晰,易于理解其用途。

  3. 函数定义:

    函数get_integer_from_usergenerate_secret_number的命名清晰,函数内部也没有发现逻辑错误。

  4. 代码逻辑:

    get_integer_from_user函数通过输入提示获取用户输入,并使用try-except语句捕获可能的异常。generate_secret_number函数根据用户输入的数字数量生成一个随机数列表,并将其排序。

  5. 代码注释:

    代码中没有明显的注释问题,虽然代码比较简单,但是有足够的注释来解释函数的目的和逻辑。

  6. 代码的可读性:

    代码的可读性整体上较高,易于理解。

  7. 性能:

    由于代码比较简单,没有涉及到复杂的算法或者性能敏感的操作,因此性能不是问题。

  8. 安全性:

    代码中没有涉及到安全性的评估,因为代码功能简单,不涉及安全相关的敏感信息处理。

  9. 代码复用性:

    代码的复用性可以根据实际需求进行优化,例如添加到代码库中以便在其他地方重用。

  10. 依赖管理:

    代码中没有显示依赖管理的问题,但是如果代码库中有依赖的第三方库,需要确保这些库已经正确安装和兼容。

综上所述,代码的整体质量较高,但是需要根据实际的应用场景和需求进行相应的优化和调整。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants