Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 1.9.latest] Add batch context object to microbatch jinja context #11064

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport c3d87b8 from #11031.

* Add `batch_id` to jinja context of microbatch batches

* Add changie doc

* Update `format_batch_start` to assume `batch_start` is always provided

* Add "runtime only" property `batch_context` to `ModelNode`

By it being "runtime only" we mean that it doesn't exist on the artifact
and thus won't be written out to the manifest artifact.

* Begin populating `batch_context` during materialization execution for microbatch batches

* Fix circular import

* Fixup MicrobatchBuilder.batch_id property method

* Ensure MicrobatchModelRunner doesn't double compile batches

We were compiling the node for each batch _twice_. Besides making microbatch
models more expensive than they needed to be, double compiling wasn't
causing any issue. However the first compilation was happening _before_ we
had added the batch context information to the model node for the batch. This
was leading to models which try to access the `batch_context` information on the
model to blow up, which was undesirable. As such, we've now gone and skipped
the first compilation. We've done this similar to how SavedQuery nodes skip
compilation.

* Add `__post_serialize__` method to `BatchContext` to ensure correct dict shape

This is weird, but necessary, I apologize. Mashumaro handles the
dictification of this class via a compile time generated `to_dict`
method based off of the _typing_ of th class. By default `datetime`
types are converted to strings. We don't want that, we want them to
stay datetimes.

* Update tests to check for `batch_context`

* Update `resolve_event_time_filter` to use new `batch_context`

* Stop testing for batchless compiled code for microbatch models

In 45daec7 we stopped an extra compilation
that was happening per batch prior to the batch_context being loaded. Stopping
this extra compilation means that compiled sql for the microbatch model without
the event time filter / batch context is no longer produced. We have discussed
this and _believe_ it is okay given that this is a new node type that has not
hit GA yet.

* Rename `ModelNode.batch_context` to `ModelNode.batch`

* Rename `build_batch_context` to `build_jinja_context_for_batch`

The name `build_batch_context` was confusing as
1) We have a `BatchContext` object, which the method was not building
2) The method builds the jinja context for the batch
As such it felt appropriate to rename the method to more accurately
communicate what it does.

* Rename test macro `invalid_batch_context_macro_sql` to `invalid_batch_jinja_context_macro_sql`

This rename was to make it more clear that the jinja context for a
batch was being checked, as a batch_context has a slightly different
connotation.

* Update changie doc

(cherry picked from commit c3d87b8)
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2024 22:42
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Nov 27, 2024
@QMalcolm QMalcolm closed this Nov 27, 2024
@QMalcolm QMalcolm reopened this Nov 27, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.13%. Comparing base (65f05e0) to head (3519cd8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 1.9.latest.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           1.9.latest   #11064      +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage       89.11%   89.13%   +0.01%     
==============================================
  Files             183      183              
  Lines           23767    23783      +16     
==============================================
+ Hits            21180    21199      +19     
+ Misses           2587     2584       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 86.44% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unit 62.17% <72.72%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
Unit Tests 62.17% <72.72%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Integration Tests 86.44% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

@QMalcolm QMalcolm merged commit 6a36444 into 1.9.latest Nov 27, 2024
60 of 61 checks passed
@QMalcolm QMalcolm deleted the backport-11031-to-1.9.latest branch November 27, 2024 23:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants