Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps-dev): bump esbuild from 0.20.1 to 0.20.2 #2330

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 15, 2024

Bumps esbuild from 0.20.1 to 0.20.2.

Release notes

Sourced from esbuild's releases.

v0.20.2

  • Support TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields (#3684)

    With this release, you can now use TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields. This was silently compiled incorrectly in esbuild 0.19.7 and below, and was an error from esbuild 0.19.8 to esbuild 0.20.1. Code such as the following should now work correctly:

    // Original code
    const log = (x: any, y: string) => console.log(y)
    abstract class Foo { @log abstract foo: string }
    new class extends Foo { foo = '' }
    // Old output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={"compilerOptions":{"experimentalDecorators":true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();
    // New output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={"compilerOptions":{"experimentalDecorators":true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    __decorateClass([
    log
    ], Foo.prototype, "foo", 2);
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();

  • JSON loader now preserves __proto__ properties (#3700)

    Copying JSON source code into a JavaScript file will change its meaning if a JSON object contains the __proto__ key. A literal __proto__ property in a JavaScript object literal sets the prototype of the object instead of adding a property named __proto__, while a literal __proto__ property in a JSON object literal just adds a property named __proto__. With this release, esbuild will now work around this problem by converting JSON to JavaScript with a computed property key in this case:

    // Original code
    import data from 'data:application/json,{"__proto__":{"fail":true}}'
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(data)?.fail) throw 'fail'
    // Old output (with --bundle)
    (() => {
    // <data:application/json,{"proto":{"fail":true}}>
    var json_proto_fail_true_default = { proto: { fail: true } };
    // entry.js
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(json_proto_fail_true_default)?.fail)
    throw "fail";
    })();

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from esbuild's changelog.

0.20.2

  • Support TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields (#3684)

    With this release, you can now use TypeScript experimental decorators on abstract class fields. This was silently compiled incorrectly in esbuild 0.19.7 and below, and was an error from esbuild 0.19.8 to esbuild 0.20.1. Code such as the following should now work correctly:

    // Original code
    const log = (x: any, y: string) => console.log(y)
    abstract class Foo { @log abstract foo: string }
    new class extends Foo { foo = '' }
    // Old output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={&quot;compilerOptions&quot;:{&quot;experimentalDecorators&quot;:true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();
    // New output (with --loader=ts --tsconfig-raw={&quot;compilerOptions&quot;:{&quot;experimentalDecorators&quot;:true}})
    const log = (x, y) => console.log(y);
    class Foo {
    }
    __decorateClass([
    log
    ], Foo.prototype, "foo", 2);
    new class extends Foo {
    foo = "";
    }();

  • JSON loader now preserves __proto__ properties (#3700)

    Copying JSON source code into a JavaScript file will change its meaning if a JSON object contains the __proto__ key. A literal __proto__ property in a JavaScript object literal sets the prototype of the object instead of adding a property named __proto__, while a literal __proto__ property in a JSON object literal just adds a property named __proto__. With this release, esbuild will now work around this problem by converting JSON to JavaScript with a computed property key in this case:

    // Original code
    import data from 'data:application/json,{"__proto__":{"fail":true}}'
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(data)?.fail) throw 'fail'
    // Old output (with --bundle)
    (() => {
    // <data:application/json,{"proto":{"fail":true}}>
    var json_proto_fail_true_default = { proto: { fail: true } };
    // entry.js
    if (Object.getPrototypeOf(json_proto_fail_true_default)?.fail)
    throw "fail";
    })();

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from mfranzke as a code owner March 15, 2024 01:57
@dependabot dependabot bot added javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code 🤫dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file labels Mar 15, 2024
@dependabot dependabot bot requested review from nmerget, dkolba and annsch as code owners March 15, 2024 01:57
Copy link
Contributor

🔭🐙🐈 Test this branch here: https://db-ui.github.io/mono/review/dependabot-npm_and_yarn-esbuild-0.20.2

@github-actions github-actions bot enabled auto-merge March 15, 2024 01:57
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 📺showcases Changes to 1-n showcases label Mar 15, 2024
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot-npm_and_yarn-esbuild-0.20.2 branch from 0637fb6 to 4919aaa Compare March 15, 2024 02:05
Bumps [esbuild](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild) from 0.20.1 to 0.20.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](evanw/esbuild@v0.20.1...v0.20.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: esbuild
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot-npm_and_yarn-esbuild-0.20.2 branch from 4919aaa to ee3a669 Compare March 15, 2024 02:14
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 1f228cf into main Mar 15, 2024
27 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the dependabot-npm_and_yarn-esbuild-0.20.2 branch March 15, 2024 02:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤫dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update Javascript code 📺showcases Changes to 1-n showcases
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants