This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I'm opening this pull request as part of a push to modernise how packages use Flit as a Python build backend.
Using
flit_core
as the backend in place offlit
is recommended in the docs, and will make it faster for tools like pip & build to build your package from source, as it has fewer dependencies to install.Specifying an explicit version range (
>=2,<4
) helps to ensure that your package can still be readily built from source despite changes in future major versions of Flit, because it will still use version 3.x. For instance, a future version is likely to drop support for the[tool.flit.metadata]
table, in favour of the now-standardised[project]
table for metadata. This is also in the docs, along with details of which versions support which features.Most users probably install your package from a pre-built 'wheel' on PyPI, so this changes won't affect them at all. But people who install from a git checkout, for instance, will benefit.