Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No curation ephys AND kilosort triggering #54

Closed
wants to merge 136 commits into from

Conversation

ttngu207
Copy link
Contributor

@ttngu207 ttngu207 commented Jan 26, 2022

Fix #34
Fix #40
Fix #37
Fix #39

Thinh Nguyen and others added 30 commits August 18, 2021 15:16
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Yatsenko <[email protected]>
@kabilar kabilar mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2022
Comment on lines 327 to 329
self.EphysFile.insert([{**key,
'file_path': fp.relative_to(root_dir).as_posix()}
for fp in probe_data.recording_info['recording_files']])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
self.EphysFile.insert([{**key,
'file_path': fp.relative_to(root_dir).as_posix()}
for fp in probe_data.recording_info['recording_files']])
self.EphysFile.insert({**key,
'file_path': fp.relative_to(root_dir).as_posix()}
for fp in probe_data.recording_info['recording_files'])

@ttngu207
Copy link
Contributor Author

ttngu207 commented Sep 2, 2022

@kabilar should we close this PR? We can issue PR from the run_kilosort branch?

@kabilar
Copy link
Collaborator

kabilar commented Sep 14, 2022

Thanks @ttngu207. That sounds good. Feel free to close and create a new pull request. Let's ask @sidhulyalkar to review and merge.

# explicitly garbage collect "loaded_oe"
# as these may have large memory footprint and may not be cleared fast enough
del loaded_oe
gc.collect()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dimitri-yatsenko Your comment on PR #71 is regarding an add from PR #54. PR71 assumes 54 will be merged first, which is why it is marked as draft.

I'm not about the details on garbage collection. Comments here indicate that loaded_oe has significant memory demands

@ttngu207
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR - to be replaced by a new PR from the run_kilosort branch

@ttngu207 ttngu207 closed this Sep 21, 2022
kabilar pushed a commit to kabilar/element-array-ephys that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2023
trialized and localization notebooks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
5 participants