Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Release] Release v1.55.0 #4146

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[Release] Release v1.55.0 #4146

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rauchy
Copy link
Contributor

@rauchy rauchy commented Oct 23, 2024

New Features and Improvements

  • Add databricks_alert resource to replace databricks_sql_alert (#4051).
  • Added resource databricks_custom_app_integration (#4124).
  • Handle schema attribute in databricks_pipeline (#4137).

Bug Fixes

  • Change repo used in test (#4122).

Documentation

  • Clarify that graviton option of databricks_node_type could be used on Azure (#4125).
  • Fix argument in example for databricks_custom_app_integration (#4132).
  • Fix for UC on AWS guide - use databricks_aws_unity_catalog_assume_role_policy where necessary (#4109).

Exporter

  • Breaking change: Move databricks_workspace_file to a separate service (#4118).
  • Exclude some system schemas from export (#4121).
  • Use List + iteration instead of call to ListAll (#4123).

### New Features and Improvements

 * Add `databricks_alert` resource to replace `databricks_sql_alert` ([#4051](#4051)).
 * Added resource `databricks_custom_app_integration` ([#4124](#4124)).
 * Handle `schema` attribute in `databricks_pipeline` ([#4137](#4137)).

### Bug Fixes

 * Change repo used in test ([#4122](#4122)).

### Documentation

 * Clarify that `graviton` option of `databricks_node_type` could be used on Azure ([#4125](#4125)).
 * Fix argument in example for `databricks_custom_app_integration` ([#4132](#4132)).
 * Fix for UC on AWS guide - use `databricks_aws_unity_catalog_assume_role_policy` where necessary ([#4109](#4109)).

### Exporter

 * **Breaking change**: Move `databricks_workspace_file` to a separate service ([#4118](#4118)).
 * Exclude some system schemas from export ([#4121](#4121)).
 * Use `List` + iteration instead of call to `ListAll` ([#4123](#4123)).
@rauchy rauchy requested review from a team as code owners October 23, 2024 15:25
@rauchy rauchy requested review from mgyucht and removed request for a team October 23, 2024 15:25
@rauchy rauchy closed this Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants