Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(drive): improve withdrawal logging #2203

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

shumkov
Copy link
Member

@shumkov shumkov commented Oct 3, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

During debugging we need more verbose information in logs

What was done?

  • Updated some log messages and data

How Has This Been Tested?

Debugging locally

Breaking Changes

None

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced clarity in transaction logging by renaming "withdrawal transactions" to "asset unlock transactions."
    • Updated logging messages for rebroadcasting expired withdrawals for improved consistency.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in transaction broadcasting, now including transaction index for better failure context.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined transaction payload handling for more efficient processing.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on modifications to two methods within the Platform implementation related to withdrawal transactions. The append_signatures_and_broadcast_withdrawal_transactions_v0 method has been updated to improve clarity in logging by renaming "withdrawal transactions" to "asset unlock transactions" and streamlining the payload handling logic. The rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v0 method has seen updates to its logging messages for consistency, while its logic remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/append_signatures_and_broadcast_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs Renamed "withdrawal transactions" to "asset unlock transactions" in logging; streamlined payload handling; adjusted error handling to include transaction index.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs Updated logging messages for clarity; overall logic remains unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In the burrows deep, where the transactions flow,
We rename and refine, let clarity grow.
With signatures signed, and logs shining bright,
Asset unlocks gleam in the soft moonlight.
Hopping through changes, with joy we embrace,
A clearer path forward, a swift, happy race! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8cadcb and 34cc64e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/append_signatures_and_broadcast_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/append_signatures_and_broadcast_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs (1)

25-25: Improved log message clarity. Consider adding more context.

The updated log message is more specific and accurately describes the action being taken. This change aligns well with the PR objective of improving withdrawal logging.

Consider adding more context to the log message, such as including the current quorum identifier. This could help in debugging by providing more detailed information. For example:

tracing::warn!("Current quorum (id: {}) not in current validator set, do not re-broadcast expired withdrawals", current_quorum_id);

Replace current_quorum_id with the actual variable or method call that provides this information.

packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/append_signatures_and_broadcast_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs (2)

58-63: LGTM: Improved payload extraction logic

The restructuring of the payload extraction logic using let Some(...) = ... else construct improves code readability and ensures early failure if the payload is not of the expected type. This change enhances the robustness of the function.

Consider updating the error message to be more specific:

- "withdrawal transaction payload must be AssetUnlockPayloadType".to_string(),
+ format!("Expected AssetUnlockPayloadType, but got {:?}", transaction.special_transaction_payload),

This change would provide more detailed information about the actual payload type in case of an error.


97-98: LGTM: Improved error logging with additional context

The error log messages have been enhanced:

  1. The terminology has been consistently updated to "asset unlock transaction".
  2. The addition of the transaction index (tx_index) to the log messages provides valuable context for debugging and tracking errors.

These changes improve the ability to diagnose issues with specific transactions.

For consistency with the success log message, consider using tx_id = transaction.txid().to_hex() instead of tx_id = transaction.txid().to_string() in the error log messages. This would ensure a uniform representation of transaction IDs across all log messages.

Also applies to: 107-107

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09d89f8 and f8cadcb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/append_signatures_and_broadcast_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs (5 hunks)
  • packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs (1)
Learnt from: shumkov
PR: dashpay/platform#2185
File: packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v1/mod.rs:47-62
Timestamp: 2024-09-30T11:55:43.856Z
Learning: In `rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v1`, the variable `expired_withdrawal_indices` needs to be a `Vec<WithdrawalTransactionIndex>` rather than a `BTreeSet<WithdrawalTransactionIndex>`, because a vector is necessary for subsequent processing.
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs (2)

30-31: Improved log message clarity and consistency.

The updated log message is more specific and consistent with the previous log message change. Including the position of the current quorum provides valuable context for debugging. This change aligns well with the PR objective of improving withdrawal logging.

The use of the "debug" log level is appropriate for this informational message.


25-31: Summary: Improved logging clarity without functional changes.

The changes in this file are limited to improving the clarity and specificity of log messages. These modifications align well with the PR objective of enhancing withdrawal logging for debugging purposes. The core functionality of the method remains unchanged, which minimizes the risk of introducing new issues.

Key points:

  1. Log messages are now more specific about the action of not re-broadcasting expired withdrawals.
  2. The changes provide better context for debugging, especially in the case where the current quorum is not the most recent.
  3. Appropriate log levels (warn and debug) are used for different scenarios.

These improvements should facilitate easier debugging without necessitating additional testing, as the functional logic remains unaltered.

packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/append_signatures_and_broadcast_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs (4)

34-36: LGTM: Improved logging clarity

The log message has been updated to use "asset unlock transactions" instead of "withdrawal transactions". This change enhances clarity and consistency in the logs, aligning with the PR's objective of improving debugging information.


64-71: LGTM: Clear and logical payload modification

The changes in this segment are well-structured and logical:

  1. The quorum signature is correctly assigned to the payload.
  2. The transaction index is extracted before modifying the payload, which is a good practice.
  3. The modified payload is properly assigned back to the transaction.

These changes maintain the integrity of the transaction data while adding the necessary modifications.


81-82: LGTM: Enhanced logging for successful broadcasts

The log message for successful transaction broadcasts has been improved:

  1. The terminology has been updated to "asset unlock transaction", maintaining consistency with earlier changes.
  2. The addition of the transaction index (tx_index) to the log message provides valuable context for debugging and tracking.

These changes align with the PR's objective of improving logging verbosity and clarity.


Line range hint 1-180: Summary: Successful implementation of improved asset unlock transaction logging

This PR successfully achieves its objective of enhancing the verbosity and clarity of log messages for asset unlock transactions (previously referred to as withdrawal transactions). The changes include:

  1. Consistent terminology updates throughout the file.
  2. Addition of transaction indices to log messages, providing more context for debugging.
  3. Improved code structure for payload extraction and error handling.

These modifications significantly enhance the maintainability and debuggability of the code. The changes are well-implemented and align closely with the PR's stated goals.

A few minor suggestions were made for further improvements:

  1. Enhancing the error message in the payload type check.
  2. Ensuring consistency in the representation of transaction IDs in log messages.

Overall, this is a solid improvement to the codebase.

@lklimek
Copy link
Contributor

lklimek commented Oct 3, 2024

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 3, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants