Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump GroveDB dependency #2196

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

fominok
Copy link
Contributor

@fominok fominok commented Oct 1, 2024

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

We release a new version of GroveDB that brings new version of GroveDBG

What was done?

Updated rs-drive dependencies

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated dependency versions for improved performance and stability, including grovedb and related libraries.
    • Added optional dependencies for enhanced functionality.
  • New Features
    • Reintroduced the grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element function, allowing for conditional insertion in GroveDB.
    • Updated the return type of the grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element_v0 method to provide more informative results.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Cargo.toml files for both the drive and platform-version packages, focusing on version increments for several dependencies, particularly the grovedb family, which has been updated from version 2.0.3 to 2.1.0. All updates are marked as optional dependencies. Additionally, the grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element function has been reintroduced in the drive package, and the return type of the grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element_v0 method has been modified to return an Option<Element> instead of a boolean.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/rs-drive/Cargo.toml Updated dependency versions for grovedb, grovedb-costs, grovedb-path, grovedb-storage, grovedb-version, and grovedb-epoch-based-storage-flags from 2.0.3 to 2.1.0. Marked all as optional. Updated various libraries in the dependencies section.
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/mod.rs Reintroduced the grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element function in the Drive implementation, allowing insertion of an element if the specified path and key do not exist.
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/v0/mod.rs Updated return type of grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element_v0 from Result<bool, Error> to Result<Option<Element>, Error>.
packages/rs-platform-version/Cargo.toml Updated dependency version for grovedb-version from 2.0.3 to 2.1.0.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagrams generated as the changes do not involve new features or modifications to control flow.)

Poem

🐇 In the garden where dependencies grow,
Versions updated, watch them flow!
From 2.0.3 to 2.1.0,
Optional friends, all in a row.
With a hop and a skip, we cheer,
For smoother builds, let's give a cheer! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/v0/mod.rs (1)

1-30: Summary of changes and implications.

The update to the GroveDB dependency has resulted in a change to the grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element_v0 method signature and return type. This change improves the method's functionality by providing more detailed information about the operation's outcome. However, it's crucial to ensure that:

  1. The GroveDB dependency has been correctly updated in the project's Cargo.toml file.
  2. All code that calls this method is updated to handle the new Result<Option<Element>, Error> return type.
  3. Comprehensive testing is performed to verify that these changes don't introduce any regressions or unexpected behavior.

Consider adding or updating unit tests for this method and any affected calling code to ensure the changes are working as expected.

packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/mod.rs (2)

12-36: LGTM: Well-documented method signature with a minor suggestion.

The method signature and documentation are well-defined and comprehensive. They provide clear information about the method's purpose, parameters, and return values. The use of DriveVersion parameter aligns well with the PR objective of updating dependencies.

Consider updating the parameter name in the documentation from platform_version to drive_version to match the actual parameter name in the method signature:

-    /// * `platform_version`: The platform version to select the correct function version to run.
+    /// * `drive_version`: The drive version to select the correct function version to run.

37-52: LGTM: Solid implementation with version-based dispatching.

The method implementation uses a clean version-based dispatching approach, which aligns well with the modular structure suggested by the v0 module. The error handling for unknown versions is appropriate and informative.

To future-proof this implementation, consider:

  1. Using a constant or enum for the known versions instead of a hardcoded vector:

    const KNOWN_VERSIONS: &[u32] = &[0];
  2. Preparing for future versions by adding a comment:

    match drive_version.grove_methods.basic.grove_insert_if_not_exists {
        0 => self.grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element_v0(...),
        // Add new version matches here as they are implemented
        version => Err(Error::Drive(DriveError::UnknownVersionMismatch {
            method: "grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element".to_string(),
            known_versions: KNOWN_VERSIONS.to_vec(),
            received: version,
        })),
    }

These changes would make it easier to maintain and extend the version support in the future.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50b4f87 and 231c0e1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/rs-platform-version/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/rs-platform-version/Cargo.toml (2)

Line range hint 1-18: Consider checking for updates in rs-drive package

While this update in the rs-platform-version package looks good, the PR objectives mentioned changes to rs-drive dependencies. It might be worth verifying if there are any necessary updates in the rs-drive package related to this GroveDB version bump.

Run the following script to check for GroveDB usage in the rs-drive package:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for GroveDB usage in rs-drive package

# Test: Search for grovedb in Cargo.toml files within rs-drive package
fd -t f Cargo.toml packages/rs-drive -x rg 'grovedb'

# Test: Search for "use grovedb" in Rust files within rs-drive package
rg --type rust 'use grovedb' packages/rs-drive

This will help identify if there are any places in the rs-drive package that might need attention due to this GroveDB update.


14-14: LGTM. Verify compatibility and update changelog if needed.

The update of grovedb-version from 2.0.3 to 2.1.0 aligns with the PR objectives. This minor version bump should introduce new features or improvements without breaking changes.

To ensure a smooth integration:

  1. Verify that this update is compatible with the rest of the project.
  2. Check if any code changes are needed to leverage new features or adapt to any modifications.
  3. Update the changelog to reflect this dependency update, if applicable.

Run the following script to check for any other occurrences of grovedb-version in the project:

This will help identify any other places where the grovedb-version update might have an impact.

packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/v0/mod.rs (2)

1-20: Approve changes to imports and method signature.

The updated method signature now returns Result<Option<Element>, Error> instead of Result<bool, Error>. This change provides more detailed information about the operation's outcome, potentially improving error handling or data retrieval capabilities.


20-20: Review impact of return type change on calling code.

The change in return type from Result<bool, Error> to Result<Option<Element>, Error> provides more detailed information but may require updates to any code that calls this method. Ensure that all calling code is updated to handle the Option<Element> correctly.

To identify potentially affected code, run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find potential usages of grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element_v0

# Test: Search for method calls
rg --type rust 'grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element_v0'
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element/mod.rs (2)

1-10: LGTM: Imports and module structure are appropriate.

The imports and module structure align well with the functionality being implemented. The v0 module declaration suggests a good practice of version-specific implementations, which aligns with the PR objective of updating dependencies.


1-53: Summary: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives.

This implementation of grove_insert_if_not_exists_return_existing_element aligns perfectly with the PR objective of updating the GroveDB dependency. The version-based approach allows for seamless integration of the updated GroveDBG version while maintaining backwards compatibility.

The code is well-structured, properly documented, and follows good practices for error handling and version management. The minor suggestions provided in the review comments will further enhance the code's maintainability and clarity.

Great job on this update! The implementation looks solid and ready for integration.

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer added this to the v1.4.0 milestone Oct 4, 2024
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer merged commit 37b5ea4 into v1.4-dev Oct 4, 2024
77 checks passed
@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer deleted the bump-grovedbg-v2.1.0 branch October 4, 2024 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants