Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(platform)!: proofs v1 support #1934

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

feat(platform)!: proofs v1 support #1934

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

QuantumExplorer
Copy link
Member

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer commented Jul 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Proofs have been recently updated in groveDB in this PR: dashpay/grovedb#309

What was done?

Integrated the new proof system.
Regenerated all tests.

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have added "!" to the title and described breaking changes in the corresponding section if my code contains any
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if needed

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

@QuantumExplorer QuantumExplorer requested a review from shumkov as a code owner July 9, 2024 06:31
@shumkov shumkov merged commit 0effb07 into feat/contestedDocumentResolutionWithMasternodeVoting Jul 9, 2024
4 checks passed
@shumkov shumkov deleted the feat/proofsV2support branch July 9, 2024 07:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@shumkov shumkov Awaiting requested review from shumkov

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@QuantumExplorer @shumkov