Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deepsource tuple unpacking Fix #1549

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Deepsource tuple unpacking Fix #1549

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

natejly
Copy link
Collaborator

@natejly natejly commented Jun 7, 2024

Related to deepsource PYL-W0632

@natejly natejly closed this Jun 7, 2024
@deepsource-io deepsource.io
Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Jun 7, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 5bc5535..b4e1f1d. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ Success
🎯 1 occurence resolved
View Check ↗
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregatePython
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage99.7%99.7%
Line Coverage99.7%99.7%
New Branch Coverage100%100%
New Composite Coverage100%100%
New Line Coverage100%, ✅ Above Threshold100%, ✅ Above Threshold
💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

@natejly natejly reopened this Jun 7, 2024
@natejly natejly changed the title Deepsource tuple unpacking Deepsource tuple unpacking Fix Jun 7, 2024
@nfahlgren nfahlgren added the work in progress Mark work in progress label Jul 4, 2024
@nfahlgren nfahlgren added breaking and removed work in progress Mark work in progress labels Jul 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
breaking
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@natejly @nfahlgren