Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dagster-tableau] Rename Tableau asset builder fn #25667

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

maximearmstrong
Copy link
Contributor

@maximearmstrong maximearmstrong commented Oct 31, 2024

Summary & Motivation

Updates fn name to build_tableau_materializable_asset_definitions to be consistent with Dagster external vs materializable assets.

Subsequent PR will add an asset spec parser function that users could use to split their asset specs in external and materializable asset specs - the goal is to make the Tableau boilerplate more elegant and easy to implement.

How I Tested These Changes

Updated tests

@maximearmstrong maximearmstrong self-assigned this Oct 31, 2024
@maximearmstrong maximearmstrong marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 18:09
Copy link

Deploy preview for dagster-docs-beta ready!

Preview available at https://dagster-docs-beta-mzlctekpw-elementl.vercel.app

Direct link to changed pages:

@maximearmstrong maximearmstrong merged commit d54c530 into master Oct 31, 2024
3 checks passed
@maximearmstrong maximearmstrong deleted the maxime/rename-tableau-builder-asset-fn branch October 31, 2024 18:47
OwenKephart pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
## Summary & Motivation

Updates fn name to `build_tableau_materializable_asset_definitions` to
be consistent with Dagster external vs materializable assets.

Subsequent PR will add an asset spec parser function that users could
use to split their asset specs in external and materializable asset
specs - the goal is to make the Tableau boilerplate more elegant and
easy to implement.

## How I Tested These Changes

Updated tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants