Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip interceptor for methods that are not registered in the server #48

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

anuraaga
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment on lines +186 to 188
intr_type = AsyncCountingInterceptor if aio else CountingInterceptor
intr = intr_type()
interceptors = [intr]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could this be simplified to:

interceptors = [AsyncCountingInterceptor() if aio else CountiningInterceptor()]

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It’s following the pattern used elsewhere in the tests. I agree it’s weird looking though and I forget why it’s like that. There’s something to be said for both simplifying it and for keeping it consistent. I’m fine either way so will leave it up to you.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have gone ahead and left it as is to be consistent with the other tests. My understanding is that while not many, some of the interceptors accept a parameter in their constructor so this pattern allows passing parameters without repetition. Figured may as well leave them as is, and just stick with it throughout.

@d5h
Copy link
Collaborator

d5h commented Nov 15, 2023

Thanks for fixing this @anuraaga ! It’s much appreciated!

One more small thing, could you bump the version please? It’s needed for a new release.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@anuraaga anuraaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @d5h! sorry for missing the point in the contributor docs

Comment on lines +186 to 188
intr_type = AsyncCountingInterceptor if aio else CountingInterceptor
intr = intr_type()
interceptors = [intr]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have gone ahead and left it as is to be consistent with the other tests. My understanding is that while not many, some of the interceptors accept a parameter in their constructor so this pattern allows passing parameters without repetition. Figured may as well leave them as is, and just stick with it throughout.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (af11a9b) 94.68% compared to head (c98b0c7) 94.70%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.68%   94.70%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         376      378       +2     
  Branches       55       56       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          356      358       +2     
  Misses         15       15              
  Partials        5        5              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@d5h d5h merged commit d866a1b into d5h-foss:master Nov 16, 2023
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants