-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add initial higher limits and default behavior for private tool resource restrictions #132
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The basic gist here is:
set-private-tool-defaults
should set anything that isn't provided to the (lower) default limits, whererestrict-private-tool-container
has been repurposed to restrict things down to the higher maximum limits. I've kept it so the latter will still default the values to the default limits, but I wanted to be slightly more explicit, particularly because ultimately we may want to moverestrict-private-tool-container
to another namespace and apply it to all tools, not just private ones.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original intent was to restrict private tools to a maximum of the
apps.tools.private.memory-limit
config (16GB), whether the user provided no limit, or if the provided limit was higher than this configured max.So is it now the intent to allow the user to set a higher limit for private tools, up to the
apps.tools.memory-limit
max for all tools (32GB)? Or do we still want to restrict private tools to a lower limit than public tools (of course, an admin should still be able to lift the limit to theapps.tools.memory-limit
max)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That all tools would be subject to the same effective maximum was my understanding, yeah -- with the prior limits for private tools becoming the defaults instead (and we'll also be hiding this slightly behind something saying it's advanced behaviour). Not much benefit to adding an interface for this unless it can be adjusted both up and down, and I don't think we want to bring the defaults down (though we could -- VICE defaults to 2 cores and I forget how much memory, but I think less than the current private tool defaults). It's also worth noting that the trajectory here is towards this being only the max, adding a field also for the minimum (default whatever value we consider acceptable as the smallest slot), and then allowing users to select a value between them at runtime. Once again there, we'd probably peg the defaults somewhere like these older values, I think