FLARM NMEA protocol serie #827
Conversation
|
You are completely wrong here.
|
main/sdr.go
Outdated
| @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ type Dump1090TermMessage struct { | |||
| func (e *ES) read() { | |||
| defer e.wg.Done() | |||
| log.Println("Entered ES read() ...") | |||
| cmd := exec.Command(STRATUX_HOME + "/bin/dump1090", "--oversample", "--net-stratux-port", "30006", "--net", "--device-index", strconv.Itoa(e.indexID), "--ppm", strconv.Itoa(e.ppm)) | |||
| cmd := exec.Command(STRATUX_HOME + "/bin/dump1090", "--gain", "37.2", "--net-stratux-port", "30006", "--net", "--device-index", strconv.Itoa(e.indexID), "--ppm", strconv.Itoa(e.ppm)) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Have you tested this? I did a while ago with different antenna configurations and found changing the gain levels to be ineffective, the frontend on the SDR is overloaded before the gain levels make a difference. Beyond 100 ft with a high gain antenna and the highest gain level didn't cause reception issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We had reports of 1090ES planes getting lost when coming too close and @VirusPilot did some tests today with his 250W transponder and yes, it did indeed make quite a difference for receiving close signals.
With dump1090's dev branch (which now has optional adaptive gain), this can be tested quite nicely, as it will tune down gain to receive close aircraft - and there is indeed a strong correlation between distance to the transponder and the gain level that dump1090 determines to be appropriate to properly decode it.
Considering the variance in SDR quality/sensitivity and antennas, maybe the SDR you tested with was just one of the "more deaf" ones?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Deaf" wouldn't cause that behavior, I'm more referencing gain compression.
I can't get my own transponder signal in my aircraft using any R820T(2) receivers (I've tested them all), so I'd guess the new adaptive gain on dump1090 ends up pulling the gain back pretty far permanently when used inside a small aircraft with a transponder installed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, own transponder is certainly another level, VirusPilot tried on the ground, testing how far he needs to walk away to receive it. And yes, the adaptive gain is not usuable if you carry a transponder very close - but it is usuable for testing if reducing gain helps at all (and what gain works at what distance). @VirusPilot measured something like this:
- With 50db gain reception fails below 250m
- With 37.5db gain below 150m
- With 30db gain below 100m
Since 100m is certainly too low to react anyway, and we didn't want to break anything for people with minimalistic internal antennas, we kinda settled with "something around 35" by pure guessing. Not too scientific admittedly..
…ic list if a target is equipped with an OGN tracker and transmits Hard=STX, so it's possible to identify other Stratux-EU users
… to fix occasional UDP stalling that would cause some EFBs to register short disconnects
…ore with wpa_supplicant for AP, added testing-code to simulate flying
Import more ship static data Handle better cos/sog
… start by systemd
…rotocols enabled than he has SDRs for
… SDR or disables one protocol), allow hotplug of UAT radio
…hat wouldn't show a keypad when connecting
…figure interface accordingly
…regardless of CSS settings.
…to better work with low baud rates or slow TCP connections
Line 88 which is error message for BMP pressure sensors, but has the same error message as lines 181 and 186 which are for IMU. Update the error message for line 88 to BMP. Signed-off-by: Amit Dhingra <[email protected]>
Hello,
I installed version V1.6r1-eu021 with FLARM but I cannot use it because it does not have the possibility of outputting in RS232 according to the FLARM NMEA protocol to use all FLARM receivers.
Would it be possible because I am a perfect computer beginner to realize it because it was developed in previous versions in the US?
Best regards