Problem: check-tx blocks consensus #1660
Conversation
try `NewConnSyncLocalClientCreator`
yihuang
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1660 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 35.17% 35.17%
=======================================
Files 123 123
Lines 11740 11740
=======================================
Hits 4129 4129
Misses 7197 7197
Partials 414 414 |
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates across several files, including the addition of a new "UNRELEASED" section in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Signed-off-by: yihuang <[email protected]>
yihuang
requested review from
JayT106 and
devashishdxt
and removed request for
a team
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py (1)
289-289: Document the async-check-tx feature flag.The
--async-check-txflag appears to be a new feature for asynchronous transaction checking. Please update the documentation to explain:
- The purpose and behavior of this flag
- When it should be used
- Any performance implications or trade-offs
go.mod (1)
Line range hint
277-285: Address TODO comments in dependency replacementsThere are several TODO comments indicating temporary solutions:
- Remove deprecated jwt-go: Remove dgrijalva/jwt-go go-mod replace cosmos/cosmos-sdk#13134
- Fix upstream vulnerabilities: Remove go.mod
replaceline for gin-gonic/gin cosmos/cosmos-sdk#10409Consider creating tracking issues for these items to ensure they're addressed in future updates.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these TODOs?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- go.mod (1 hunks)
- gomod2nix.toml (1 hunks)
- testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- CHANGELOG.md
🔇 Additional comments (6)
testground/benchmark/benchmark/stateless.py (2)
289-289: Verify the impact of async transaction checking on benchmark results.The addition of
--async-check-txflag could significantly affect transaction processing behavior and benchmark measurements. Please ensure that:
- The benchmark results with this flag are compared against the baseline (without the flag)
- Any performance differences are documented
Consider adding a configuration option to toggle this flag during benchmarks to facilitate comparison testing.
289-289: Verify the behavior of async transaction checking.Since this is a test environment, we should verify that the async transaction checking behaves correctly:
- Ensure transactions are still processed correctly
- Verify error handling works as expected
- Check for any potential race conditions
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Async transaction checking is a supported experimental feature with proper implementation
The code search reveals that:
- The async-check-tx flag is properly implemented in Ethermint's server code as an experimental feature
- The feature is integrated with the standard transaction processing pipeline:
- Has proper flag registration in server startup
- Integrates with the ante handler chain for transaction verification
- Works alongside existing transaction validation mechanisms
- The test environment uses this feature as part of a controlled test setup, which is appropriate for performance testing
The implementation appears to be properly integrated into the transaction processing pipeline while maintaining all necessary validation steps. The experimental flag is appropriately documented and logged when enabled.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for related test cases and error handling # Test: Look for test files that verify async transaction checking rg -g "**/*_test*" -A 5 "async.*check.*tx" # Test: Look for error handling related to async transaction checking rg -g "**/*.go" -A 5 "async.*check.*tx.*err"Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different search patterns and look more broadly at the codebase # Search for any mentions of async check tx in configuration or documentation rg -g "!{.git,vendor}/*" "async-check-tx" # Look for any transaction checking related code rg -g "**/*.{go,py}" "CheckTx" # Look specifically in the benchmark directory fd . testground/benchmark -t f -x cat {} \; # Check if there are any test files related to transaction processing fd test testground/benchmark -t fLength of output: 307288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's look for async transaction checking related code and tests # Search for async transaction checking in Python files rg -g "*.py" "async.*check.*tx" testground/benchmark/ # Search for async transaction checking in Go files rg -g "*.go" "async.*check.*tx" # Look for any test files that might verify transaction behavior fd test testground/benchmark -t f -x cat {} \; # Look for any transaction verification or error handling code rg -g "*.{go,py}" "(verify|check).*tx"Length of output: 5528
go.mod (3)
Line range hint
3-5: LGTM: Go toolchain update to 1.22.3The update to Go 1.22.3 is recommended as it includes important security fixes and bug fixes.
276-276: Track ethermint dependency updateThe update to ethermint
v0.6.1-0.20241028015856-e567c5ad3acfshould be monitored for any breaking changes or performance impacts.
Line range hint
6-70: Verify compatibility with updated dependenciesThe dependency updates, particularly for
ethermintand cosmos-sdk packages, should be thoroughly tested to ensure compatibility.✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are properly aligned with ecosystem requirements
The dependency updates in
go.modare well-coordinated across the Cosmos ecosystem. The key dependencies likecosmos-sdk,ethermint, and their sub-modules are all using compatible versions. The extensive usage patterns shown in the codebase demonstrate proper integration of these dependencies.Reasoning:
- The codebase shows extensive and proper usage of both cosmos-sdk and ethermint dependencies across multiple packages
- The imports follow consistent patterns and use standard interfaces from these dependencies
- No conflicting version requirements or compatibility issues are visible in the import statements
- The dependency structure maintains compatibility with both Cosmos SDK and Ethereum standards as shown by the imports
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any compatibility issues in the dependency graph # Test: Check for any dependency conflicts go mod verify # Test: Check for any indirect dependency issues go mod tidy -vLength of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's analyze the dependencies and their usage in the codebase # Check for any references to ethermint APIs rg --type go "github.com/evmos/ethermint" -A 2 # Check for cosmos-sdk version usage patterns rg --type go "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk" -A 2 # Look for any potential compatibility markers or version constraints rg -l "// requires cosmos-sdk.*" --type go rg -l "// requires ethermint.*" --type go # Check for any compatibility notes in documentation fd -e md | xargs rg -i "compatibility|requirement"Length of output: 251921
gomod2nix.toml (1)
265-266: Verify ethermint dependency update.The ethermint module update appears to be a minor version bump. Please ensure this update includes the necessary changes to support the
NewConnSyncLocalClientCreatorfeature mentioned in the PR objectives.
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch
Signed-off-by: yihuang <[email protected]>
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
support optional
NewConnSyncLocalClientCreator👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make)make test)go fmt)golangci-lint run)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Improvements
Documentation
These updates aim to enhance functionality, improve transaction handling, and maintain comprehensive documentation for users.