fix das query #31
fix das query #31
Conversation
| @@ -10,8 +10,12 @@ def do_das_query(query): | |||
| Execute das_client for the specified query, and return parsed JSON output | |||
| """ | |||
|
|
|||
| args = ['dasgoclient', '-json', '-format', 'json', '--query', query] | |||
| result = subprocess.check_output(args) | |||
| args = ['dasgoclient', '--format', 'json', '--query', query] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
according to dasgoclient -h,
-format string
Compatibility option with python das_client, use json to get das_client behavior
so I would default to -json - but the output is not identical: -json gives just the ["data"] part of the -format json. The code that uses it is easy to adjust (actually it gets simpler), but the check in https://github.com/cp3-llbb/SAMADhi/pull/31/files#diff-e068c93f5ddd6d675874177f3be1ef45L58 , should become a simple if len(summary_results) > 1 then, I think.
| try: | ||
| result = subprocess.check_output(args) | ||
| except subprocess.CalledProcessError as exc: | ||
| result = exc.output |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's safer to print a message that the query failed and exit, rather than work with the output of a failed query
|
Thanks a lot, dasgoclient is failing again, hoping it's a temporary problem I'll fix this tomorrow... |
|
Going through the list of open PRs: is this change still needed? If yes, could you address the review comments? If not we may close it. |
According to Valentin Y Kuznetsov (cms computing tools expert):
Also, are we keeping the exception block? If we don't want to, this is anyway to bear in mind in case of return codes different from zero...