Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: migrate to distribute previously allocated rewards, and distribute unaccounted denoms #3361

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

insumity
Copy link
Contributor

@insumity insumity commented Sep 27, 2024

Description

For the code to work, it has to use a dependency that includes these changes.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • Included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Added ! to the type prefix if API, client, or state breaking change (i.e., requires minor or major version bump)
  • Targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • Provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • Followed the guidelines for building SDK modules
  • Included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • Added a changelog entry in .changelog (for details, see contributing guidelines)
  • Included comments for documenting Go code
  • Updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • Reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • Confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage

go.mod Outdated
@@ -28,11 +28,12 @@ require (
github.com/cosmos/ibc-apps/modules/rate-limiting/v8 v8.0.0
github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/modules/capability v1.0.1
github.com/cosmos/ibc-go/v8 v8.5.1
github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v5 v5.0.0-20240904071545-7301916eeafa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@insumity insumity Sep 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes made so that I can use providerKeepers new methods in upgrades.go. Has to pick up those changes.
Should be updated later on.

@MSalopek MSalopek changed the title feat!: migrate to distribute previously allocate rewards, and distribute unaccounted denoms feat!: migrate to distribute previously allocated rewards, and distribute unaccounted denoms Sep 30, 2024

// CreateUpgradeHandler returns an upgrade handler for Gaia v21.
// It performs module migrations, as well as the following tasks:
// - Initializes the MaxProviderConsensusValidators parameter in the provider module to 180.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Either update or remove this comment.

bankkeeper "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/bank/keeper"
"github.com/cosmos/gaia/v20/app/keepers"
providerkeeper "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v6/x/ccv/provider/keeper"
types2 "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v6/x/ccv/provider/types"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
types2 "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v6/x/ccv/provider/types"
providertypes "github.com/cosmos/interchain-security/v6/x/ccv/provider/types"

}

// call `BeginBlockRD` to actually perform the distribution
providerKeeper.BeginBlockRD(ctx)
Copy link
Contributor Author

@insumity insumity Oct 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: After discussion with @mpoke and @sainoe we decided to not distributed the rewards because they're not whitelisted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants