Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Add MigrationModuleManager to handle migration of upgrade module before other modules #16583
fix: Add MigrationModuleManager to handle migration of upgrade module before other modules #16583
Changes from 13 commits
1e55c09
5d513a3
3fcd4d6
34d47d1
c21cff7
ea9e96a
721fb8b
3158f6a
e54fc1a
81038ec
36a3944
5e43e65
9c3a25b
5bca160
9f6994d
591d7cf
e3f80d6
26e9624
6e50d86
42fc450
59f4bef
120cdae
74746c9
7c812be
bbf4eef
ca99e59
86bc9c0
1a1b3ce
5400774
2b56da6
95c6ed9
08a9279
6ceebbf
71ea378
ff7f08d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tac0turtle is there any harm on depending on
cometbft
types intypes/module
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ideally we dont do this, this seems like a bandaid that we will have to clean up later on. i think we should identify how to fix this problem without allowing modules to override consensus params.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We must be doing this within
BeginBlock
ofManager
since the consensus params is accessed by other modules right after migration within the same block execution.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I guess there's no way around it it seems :/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could perhaps return an
any
instead and then type cast where needed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not sure if get params by consensusKeeper is better, but we need add module one by one (not to mention module outside sdk)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tac0turtle May I ask if you have any better idea beside these two approaches?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the core issue here is the migration is "system" level functionalities, probably shouldn't happen in a module in the first place, it should be executed before all the module logics. is it possible to move the migration logic into baseapp somehow?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry for delay, the dependency is fine. agree with @yihuang. Maybe for this version of baseapp this is fine but for later on we can change it. Im not sure we have a clean alternative
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
100% agree 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if we just return an
any
here and then type cast? Then we can avoid the CometBFT dependency.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since need use as
cp := getter.GetConsensusParams(ctx).(tmproto.ConsensusParams)
, we can't use any forWithConsensusParams
, or can we add a separate package to avoid import cometbft type directly