Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[skip-ci] v5.2 packit backports - sidetag enablement #23980

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

lsm5
Copy link
Member

@lsm5 lsm5 commented Sep 17, 2024

manual backport of #23927

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Packit now has sidetag support for adding multiple builds into a single
bodhi update.

Since we release c/ccommon, skopeo, buildah and podman often
almoost simultaneously, we should release them to Fedora in a single
bodhi update using sidetags so all builds can be tested together.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5f6a22d)
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]>
ELN is kind of a midway between Fedora and RHEL, so it's best to mention
ELN jobs separately. This will also allow reusing fedora targets using
YAML anchors for TMT tests.

Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 297ec1c)
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 17, 2024
@lsm5 lsm5 marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 11:25
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 18, 2024
@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Sep 18, 2024

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 18, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lsm5, Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit e8a5dfa into containers:v5.2 Sep 18, 2024
41 checks passed
@lsm5 lsm5 deleted the v5.2-packit-backports branch September 18, 2024 14:25
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Dec 18, 2024
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants