Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New release please, the most recent was in May #3520

Open
corneliusroemer opened this issue Aug 18, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

New release please, the most recent was in May #3520

corneliusroemer opened this issue Aug 18, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@corneliusroemer
Copy link
Contributor

Just installed main locally and it already fixes some good extra bugs. Would be great to get a release. The most recent release has been almost 4 months!

@jamesobutler
Copy link

@corneliusroemer If you are ok with using a SHA instead of an official tag, you can use latest latest code as described at #3542 (comment).

@SpookyYomo
Copy link
Contributor

Could we consider a 2.3.1 release soon...? Reason being that I'm on Mason and the registry is bound to 2.3.0 currently, and I'd like to see #2281 fixed, otherwise I'll just have .codespellrc of 1 line in every Cargo project of mine, since LSP config isn't a thing in Codespell from what I understand.

@luzpaz
Copy link
Collaborator

luzpaz commented Oct 20, 2024

@DimitriPapadopoulos any thoughts ?

@DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Collaborator

DimitriPapadopoulos commented Oct 21, 2024

I don't know. Perhaps the dictionaries and codespell should be split into separate Python packages, or even a dictionary tarball and a Python package for codespell itself.

@luzpaz
Copy link
Collaborator

luzpaz commented Oct 24, 2024

That seems like a major version update. Perhaps we can do a minor update before-hand ?

@tpvasconcelos
Copy link

Hey! I've also just been bitten by a bug that has already been patched last month but not released.

@DimitriPapadopoulos simply out of curiosity, what would be the reason not to publish a new release?

Thanks in advance!

@yarikoptic
Copy link
Contributor

pretty please! I am interested in f3d85db functionality

❯ git describe --tags --contains f3d85db4f187d123c255d67678a9911ef756b367
fatal: cannot describe 'f3d85db4f187d123c255d67678a9911ef756b367'
❯ git describe --tags  f3d85db4f187d123c255d67678a9911ef756b367
v2.3.0-45-gf3d85db4
❯ git describe --tags
v2.3.0-96-g04e96818

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants