-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 469
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Undo re-use
/re-using
addition: it's not necessarily a typo
#3521
Labels
Comments
Curated dictionaries and SCOWLS (And Friends) only have |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I'm just running codespell on all of the python peps. I switched to main just now, see #3520
I notice that I get a lot of
re-using
/re-use
typos. This isn't really a typo that's severe, it should maybe be part of an extra dictionary of "opinionated" rewrites. You don't want to change a PEP unless it's a clear typo.Also, I think as part of CI, one should run codespell on large code bases to see what the impact would be and whether there's a risk of false positives. Otherwise it's hard to tell.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: