Update openai-review.yml #481
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe changeset introduces significant updates to the GitHub Actions workflow, enhancing its functionality and versatility. It adds new event triggers, modifies job steps, and introduces a feature to summarize release notes. The workflow is now more responsive and informative, providing system messages for reviewers and supporting comments in Japanese. Changes
Uplevel your code reviews with CodeRabbit ProCodeRabbit ProIf you like this project, please support us by purchasing the Pro version. The Pro version has advanced context, superior noise reduction and several proprietary improvements compared to the open source version. Moreover, CodeRabbit Pro is free for open source projects. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Files selected (1)
- .github/workflows/openai-review.yml (1)
Review comments generated (8)
- Review: 8
- LGTM: 0
Tips
Chat with 
CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)
- Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
- Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging
@coderabbitaiin a reply.
Code suggestions
- The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
- You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.
Pausing incremental reviews
- Add
@coderabbitai: ignoreanywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.
| permissions: | ||
| contents: read | ||
| pull-requests: write |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The permissions set for the GitHub Actions workflow are appropriate and follow the principle of least privilege. The contents: read permission allows the action to read repository content, and pull-requests: write allows it to write pull request data.
| on: | ||
| pull_request_target: | ||
| types: [opened, synchronize, reopened] | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| types: [opened] | ||
| branches-ignore: | ||
| - master | ||
| - main | ||
| pull_request_review_comment: | ||
| types: [created] | ||
| issue_comment: | ||
| types: [created] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The event triggers have been updated to include pull_request with type opened, and issue_comment with type created. However, the pull_request_review_comment trigger is not correctly indented under the on: key. This could lead to unexpected behavior or errors when the workflow is triggered.
-13: pull_request_review_comment:
+13: pull_request_review_comment:| concurrency: | ||
| group: | ||
| ${{ github.repository }}-${{ github.event.number || github.head_ref || | ||
| github.sha }}-${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event_name == | ||
| 'pull_request_review_comment' && 'pr_comment' || 'pr' }} | ||
| group: ${{ github.repository }}-${{ github.event.number || github.head_ref || github.sha }}-${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' && 'pr_comment' || 'pr' }} | ||
| cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request_review_comment' }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The concurrency settings seem fine. They ensure that only one job runs per PR or comment, which can help prevent race conditions or redundant reviews.
| jobs: | ||
| review: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| if: (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '[run review]') && github.event.issue.pull_request) || (github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '[run review]')) || (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, 'release') && !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, 'Release')) | ||
| timeout-minutes: 15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The job setup looks good. It's set to run on ubuntu-latest and has a timeout of 15 minutes. The condition for running the job seems complex but valid, triggering on issue comments, pull request review comments, and pull requests that don't have 'release' in the title.
| - uses: coderabbitai/openai-pr-reviewer@latest | ||
| env: | ||
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} | ||
| OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }} | ||
| with: | ||
| debug: true | ||
| debug: false | ||
| review_simple_changes: false | ||
| review_comment_lgtm: false | ||
| openai_heavy_model: gpt-4 | ||
| openai_light_model: gpt-4 # 好みで変更 | ||
| openai_heavy_model: gpt-4 # 好みで変更 | ||
| openai_timeout_ms: 900000 # 15分. | ||
| language: ja-JP |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The step using coderabbitai/openai-pr-reviewer@latest is configured with environment variables for GITHUB_TOKEN and OPENAI_API_KEY. The with: parameters seem reasonable, although debug: false might limit troubleshooting if issues arise. The language model used is gpt-4, which should provide high-quality reviews. The language is set to Japanese (ja-JP), which matches the comments in the file.
| path_filters: | | ||
| !dist/** | ||
| !db/** | ||
| !**/*.lock |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The path filters exclude database files and lock files from the review. This seems reasonable as these files typically don't need code review.
| あなたは @coderabbitai（別名 github-actions[bot]）で、OpenAIによって訓練された言語モデルです。 | ||
| あなたの目的は、非常に経験豊富なソフトウェアエンジニアとして機能し、コードの一部を徹底的にレビューし、 | ||
| 以下のようなキーエリアを改善するためのコードスニペットを提案することです： | ||
| - ロジック | ||
| - セキュリティ | ||
| - パフォーマンス | ||
| - データ競合 | ||
| - 一貫性 | ||
| - エラー処理 | ||
| - 保守性 | ||
| - モジュール性 | ||
| - 複雑性 | ||
| - 最適化 | ||
| - ベストプラクティス: DRY, SOLID, KISS | ||
|
|
||
| 些細なコードスタイルの問題や、コメント・ドキュメントの欠落についてはコメントしないでください。 | ||
| 重要な問題を特定し、解決して全体的なコード品質を向上させることを目指してくださいが、細かい問題は意図的に無視してください。 | ||
| summarize: | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The system message is written in Japanese and provides a detailed explanation of the bot's purpose and capabilities. This is a good practice for clarity and user understanding.
| 次の内容でmarkdownフォーマットを使用して、最終的な回答を提供してください。 | ||
|
|
||
| - *ウォークスルー*: 特定のファイルではなく、全体の変更に関する高レベルの要約を80語以内で。 | ||
| - *変更点*: ファイルとその要約のテーブル。スペースを節約するために、同様の変更を持つファイルを1行にまとめることができます。 | ||
|
|
||
| GitHubのプルリクエストにコメントとして追加されるこの要約には、追加のコメントを避けてください。 | ||
| summarize_release_notes: | | ||
| このプルリクエストのために、その目的とユーザーストーリーに焦点を当てて、markdownフォーマットで簡潔なリリースノートを作成してください。 | ||
| 変更は次のように分類し箇条書きにすること: | ||
| "New Feature", "Bug fix", "Documentation", "Refactor", "Style", | ||
| "Test", "Chore", "Revert" | ||
| 例えば: | ||
| ``` | ||
| - New Feature: UIに統合ページが追加されました | ||
| ``` | ||
| 回答は50-100語以内にしてください。この回答はそのままリリースノートに使用されるので、追加のコメントは避けてください。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The summarize and summarize_release_notes options are set with detailed instructions in Japanese. These settings seem to be well thought out and should provide useful summaries and release notes.
Summary by CodeRabbit