-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: remove the extend library #30
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the command-line interface of the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant CLI
participant Installer
User->>CLI: Execute install command with options
CLI->>Installer: Check for version or nightly option
Installer-->>CLI: Invoke help if no valid options
CLI->>Installer: Construct options using spread operator
Installer->>Installer: Determine installation type and version
Installer->>Installer: Execute installation process
Installer-->>CLI: Return success or error status
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
warning [email protected]: This version is no longer supported. Please see https://eslint.org/version-support for other options. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/install.js (1)
Line range hint
89-92
: Consider improving error handling for package.json reading.The current implementation catches all errors silently when reading package.json. Consider differentiating between "file not found" and other errors (like permission issues) that might need different handling.
function getTypeFromPackage(options) { let engines; try { engines = require(path.join(options.cwd, 'package.json')).engines || {}; } catch (e) { + // Only swallow "module not found" errors + if (e.code !== 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND') { + throw e; + } return; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
bin/nodeinstall.js
(0 hunks)lib/install.js
(1 hunks)package.json
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- bin/nodeinstall.js
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/install.js (2)
23-26
: LGTM! Good modernization of options handling.
The spread operator implementation is a cleaner and more modern approach compared to using the extend library. The order of spreading ensures proper overriding of default values.
23-26
: Verify complete removal of extend dependency.
Let's ensure the extend library is completely removed and not used elsewhere in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
The results show no remaining imports/requires of extend
and confirm it's not listed in either dependencies or devDependencies in package.json. However, let's do one final check to ensure there are no other potential references to extend that might have been missed:
Let's check the actual usage of "extend" in those installer files to ensure they're not related to the extend library but rather just using the word in a different context:
The extend dependency has been completely removed
The occurrences of "extend" found in the codebase are all related to class inheritance (extends
keyword) in the installer files, not the extend
npm package. Combined with our previous findings showing no imports of the extend package and its removal from package.json, we can confirm the dependency has been completely removed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify complete removal of extend library
# Check for any remaining imports or requires of extend
echo "Checking for remaining extend usage..."
rg -l "(?:require\(['\"]extend['\"]|from ['\"]extend['\"])"
# Check if extend is still in package.json
echo "Checking package.json for extend dependency..."
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
jq '.dependencies.extend, .devDependencies.extend' package.json
fi
Length of output: 361
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Broader search for any mention of extend to catch edge cases
echo "Checking for any mentions of extend..."
rg -i "extend" -g "!{*.md,CHANGELOG*,LICENSE*}" -l
# Check if extend was removed from package-lock.json
echo "Checking package-lock.json..."
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
jq '.. | select(.extend?)' package-lock.json
fi
Length of output: 338
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the context of "extend" usage in installer files
echo "Checking extend usage in installer files..."
rg -C 3 "extend" lib/installer/nsolid_installer.js lib/installer/alinode_installer.js lib/installer/node_installer.js
Length of output: 1561
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
extend
package, streamlining project dependencies.