Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WV aTGC Semileptonic sample #3810

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

WV aTGC Semileptonic sample #3810

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

ram1123
Copy link
Contributor

@ram1123 ram1123 commented Nov 28, 2024

These cards are for the SMP aTGC analysis with a full run-2 dataset. The process that we considered is WV semileptonic decay.

We need MC samples for the following processes:

  1. WpWmToLpNujj
  2. WmWpToLmNujj
  3. WpZToLpNujj
  4. WmZToLmNujj
  5. ZWpToLpLmjj
  6. ZWmToLpLmjj

We binned each process based on mWV mass. There are three mWV mass bins: 150-600, 600-800, and 800 to Inf. So, in total, we will have 18 independent samples.

For this reason, as recommended, instead of adding 18 sets of cards, we added template cards and a script that will generate the cards. Furthermore, we also added a README file to clarify the details. Please check the README to know the details of the script.

Please let us know if you have any further comments/questions about the approval of these cards.

@ram1123 ram1123 changed the title Mg265 ul a tgc WV aTGC Semileptonic sample Nov 28, 2024
# Cuts on the charged leptons (e+, e-, mu+, mu-, tau+ and tau-) *
# More specific cuts can be specified in SubProcesses/cuts.f *
#***********************************************************************
20.0 = ptl ! Min lepton transverse momentum
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it ok to have this GEN lepton pT cut in the analysis? It seems rather high. Did you consider using a lower cut?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We did not consider lowering it as we used a reco level pT cut of 50 GeV. Furthermore, we are trying to probe the mWV distribution tail and the cut on mWV is 950 GeV. So, it should not cause any issues.

#***********************************************************************
1.0 = jetalgo ! FastJet jet algorithm (1=kT, 0=C/A, -1=anti-kT)
1.0 = jetradius ! The radius parameter for the jet algorithm
20.0 = ptj ! Min jet transverse momentum
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar question as below

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We only considered boosted jets with pT > 200 GeV and softdrop mass > 45 GeV.

@ram1123
Copy link
Contributor Author

ram1123 commented Dec 9, 2024

Dear GEN Experts,

If there is any further comments or suggestions, please let us know. Thank you.

@ram1123 ram1123 requested a review from lviliani December 16, 2024 17:06
@anmehta
Copy link
Contributor

anmehta commented Jan 6, 2025

Dear @lviliani,
Happy new year!!
are there any further comments from your side? Please let us know.
Best, Ankita

@lviliani
Copy link
Contributor

lviliani commented Jan 8, 2025

Sorry for the delay, I'll merge now.

@lviliani lviliani merged commit dc5c4de into cms-sw:mg265UL Jan 8, 2025
@anmehta
Copy link
Contributor

anmehta commented Jan 8, 2025

great, thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants