Review/cog optimized geotiffs #98
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
| @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ | |||
| ] | |||
| @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ | |||
| ] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| @@ -1,19 +1,20 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No it's Types of Data - Nominal, Ordinal, Discrete, Continuous. Also the variance plays a role as well has how much NA data there is.
Data Type to me implies, byte, integer, float, etc...
Reply via ReviewNB
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I changed it back and added types of data in parenthesis for clarity of context.
| @@ -1,19 +1,20 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I just realized neither notebook mentions how to get an EarthData Login https://urs.earthdata.nasa.gov/home.
@zacharyDez either you can add, and I'll re-approve. Or you can merge and I'll add to my PR #95
|
@wildintellect ; I added how to get an Earth Data login. Seems like approval is not required to merge to your PR. Let me know if there's anything I can help with. |
What I Changed
I mainly modified some of the text of both COG notebooks. The only modification to code blocks was removing comments that explain the code to a markdown cell preceding the code block. It's a personal preference that we may want to revisit.
How to Test It