Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #395

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pre-commit-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot commented Nov 25, 2024

updates:

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

  • Update the ruff-pre-commit hook from version v0.7.4 to v0.8.0 in the pre-commit configuration.

updates:
- [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.7.4 → v0.8.0](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.7.4...v0.8.0)
Copy link

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR updates the ruff-pre-commit hook from version v0.7.4 to v0.8.0 in the pre-commit configuration. This is an automated update performed by pre-commit.ci.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update ruff-pre-commit hook version
  • Bump ruff-pre-commit version from v0.7.4 to v0.8.0
.pre-commit-config.yaml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, pre-commit-ci[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Copy link

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: SonarCloud

Failed stage: SonarCloud Scan [❌]

Failure summary:

The action failed because there was an error while trying to retrieve the pull request with key 395.
This error prevented the successful execution of the action.

Relevant error logs:
1:  ##[group]Operating System
2:  Ubuntu
...

274:  16:39:15.595 INFO  Check ALM binding of project 'cleder_fastkml'
275:  16:39:15.736 INFO  Detected project binding: BOUND
276:  16:39:15.736 INFO  Check ALM binding of project 'cleder_fastkml' (done) | time=142ms
277:  16:39:15.738 INFO  Load project pull requests
278:  16:39:15.879 INFO  Load project pull requests (done) | time=141ms
279:  16:39:15.881 INFO  Load branch configuration
280:  16:39:15.882 INFO  Github event: pull_request
281:  16:39:15.889 INFO  Auto-configuring pull request 395
282:  16:39:16.036 ERROR Something went wrong while trying to get the pullrequest with key '395'
283:  16:39:16.361 INFO  EXECUTION FAILURE

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

  • Failed stage
  • Failed test name
  • Failure summary
  • Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

  • enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
  • excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
  • enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
  • persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
  • final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

Copy link

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

Copy link

Preparing review...

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1bee58b) to head (66d9991).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #395   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           68        68           
  Lines         5745      5745           
  Branches       149       149           
=========================================
  Hits          5745      5745           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link

@llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

1. Overview

1.1 PR Summary

  • Business value and requirements alignment: This PR updates the ruff-pre-commit hook from version v0.7.4 to v0.8.0 in the pre-commit configuration. This update ensures that the codebase adheres to the latest linting and formatting standards, improving code quality and maintainability.
  • Key components modified: The .pre-commit-config.yaml file is updated to reflect the new version of the ruff-pre-commit hook.
  • Impact assessment: The change is isolated to the pre-commit configuration and does not affect the system's core functionality or business logic.
  • System dependencies and integration impacts: The update does not introduce any new dependencies or impact existing system integrations.

1.2 Architecture Changes

  • System design modifications: None. This update does not alter the system design.
  • Component interactions: None. The interaction between components remains unchanged.
  • Integration points: None. The integration points are not affected by this update.

2. Detailed Technical Analysis

2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive

Core Logic Changes

[File Path] - [.pre-commit-config.yaml]

  • Submitted PR Code:
    - repo: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit
    -    rev: 'v0.7.4'
    +    rev: 'v0.8.0'
  • Analysis:
    • Current logic and potential issues: The update changes the version of the ruff-pre-commit hook from v0.7.4 to v0.8.0. This change is straightforward and should not introduce any logic issues. However, it is essential to verify that the new version is compatible with the existing configuration and does not introduce any breaking changes.
    • Edge cases and error handling: There are no edge cases or error handling considerations specific to this change. The primary concern is ensuring that the new version works as expected with the current setup.
    • **Cross-component impact **: None. This change is isolated to the pre-commit configuration.
    • **Business logic considerations **: None. This change does not affect business logic.

2.2 Implementation Quality

  • Code organization and structure: The change is well-organized and modular, affecting only the specific version of the ruff-pre-commit hook.
  • Design patterns usage: Not applicable. This change does not involve design patterns.
  • Error handling approach: Not applicable. This change does not involve error handling.
  • Resource management: The performance impact is minimal as this change only updates the version of a pre-commit hook.

3. Critical Findings

3.1 Potential Issues

  • 🔴 Critical Issues:
    • Issue description: Verify compatibility of the new ruff-pre-commit version with the existing configuration.
    • Impact: Ensuring compatibility is crucial to avoid breaking the pre-commit hooks and maintaining code quality.
    • Recommendation: Run the pre-commit hooks locally or in a CI environment to ensure that the new version works as expected.

3.2 Code Quality Concerns

  • Maintainability aspects: The change improves maintainability by ensuring that the codebase uses the latest version of the ruff-pre-commit hook, which may include bug fixes and new features.
  • Readability issues: None. The change is straightforward and does not affect code readability.
  • Performance bottlenecks: None. The performance impact is minimal.

4. Security Assessment

  • Authentication/Authorization impacts: None. This change does not affect authentication or authorization.
  • Data handling concerns: None. This change does not involve data handling.
  • Input validation: Not applicable.
  • Security best practices: Ensure that the new version of the ruff-pre-commit hook does not introduce any security vulnerabilities.
  • Potential security risks: Low risk. The primary concern is ensuring compatibility with the new version.
  • Mitigation strategies: Run the pre-commit hooks in a CI environment to ensure that the new version works as expected.
  • Security testing requirements: Verify that the new version does not introduce any security vulnerabilities.

5. Testing Strategy

5.1 Test Coverage

  • Unit test analysis: Not applicable. This change does not require unit tests.
  • Integration test requirements: Run the pre-commit hooks in a CI environment to ensure that the new version works as expected.
  • Edge cases coverage: Not applicable.

5.2 Test Recommendations

Suggested Test Cases

# Sample test code to verify the pre-commit hooks
- repo: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit
  rev: 'v0.8.0'
  hooks:
    - id: ruff
    - id: ruff-format
  • Coverage improvements: Ensure that all linting and formatting rules are applied correctly with the new version.
  • Performance testing needs: Not applicable.

6. Documentation & Maintenance

  • Documentation updates needed (API, architecture, configuration): Update the documentation to reflect the new version of the ruff-pre-commit hook.
  • Long-term maintenance considerations: Ensure that the documentation includes instructions on how to update and test pre-commit hooks.
  • Technical debt and monitoring requirements: Add a note in the documentation about the importance of keeping pre-commit hooks up to date.

7. Deployment & Operations

  • Deployment impact and strategy: The change does not affect deployment. It is isolated to the pre-commit configuration.
  • Key operational considerations: Ensure that the pre-commit hooks run successfully with the new version in the CI environment.

8. Summary & Recommendations

8.1 Key Action Items

  1. Critical changes required:
    • Verify compatibility of the new ruff-pre-commit version with the existing configuration.
  2. Important improvements suggested:
    • Update the documentation to reflect the new version of the ruff-pre-commit hook.
  3. Best practices to implement:
    • Ensure that the pre-commit hooks run successfully with the new version in the CI environment.
  4. Cross-cutting concerns to address:
    • Ensure that the new version does not introduce any breaking changes or security vulnerabilities.

8.2 Future Considerations

  • Technical evolution path: Continue to keep pre-commit hooks up to date to benefit from the latest linting and formatting standards.
  • Business capability evolution: Improved code quality and consistency can lead to better maintainability and fewer bugs.
  • System integration impacts: None. This change does not affect system integrations.

💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

@cleder cleder merged commit f8a389a into develop Nov 25, 2024
57 of 59 checks passed
@cleder cleder deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch November 25, 2024 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant