Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump codecov/codecov-action from 4 to 5 #386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 14, 2024

Bumps codecov/codecov-action from 4 to 5.

Release notes

Sourced from codecov/codecov-action's releases.

v5.0.0

v5 Release

v5 of the Codecov GitHub Action will use the Codecov Wrapper to encapsulate the CLI. This will help ensure that the Action gets updates quicker.

Migration Guide

The v5 release also coincides with the opt-out feature for tokens for public repositories. In the repository settings page in codecov.io, you can set the ability for Codecov to receive a coverage report from ANY souce. This will allow contributors or other members of a repository to upload without needing access to the Codecov token.

[!WARNING]
The following arguments have been changed

  • file (this has been deprecated in favor of files)
  • plugin (this has been deprecated in favor of plugins)

The following arguments have been added:

  • binary
  • gcov_args
  • gcov_executable
  • gcov_ignore
  • gcov_include
  • report_type
  • skip_validation
  • swift_project

You can see their usage in the action.yml file.

What's Changed

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from codecov/codecov-action's changelog.

4.0.0-beta.2

Fixes

  • #1085 not adding -n if empty to do-upload command

4.0.0-beta.1

v4 represents a move from the universal uploader to the Codecov CLI. Although this will unlock new features for our users, the CLI is not yet at feature parity with the universal uploader.

Breaking Changes

  • No current support for aarch64 and alpine architectures.
  • Tokenless uploading is unsuported
  • Various arguments to the Action have been removed

3.1.4

Fixes

  • #967 Fix typo in README.md
  • #971 fix: add back in working dir
  • #969 fix: CLI option names for uploader

Dependencies

  • #970 build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.15.12 to 18.16.3
  • #979 build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 20.1.0 to 20.1.2
  • #981 build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 20.1.2 to 20.1.4

3.1.3

Fixes

  • #960 fix: allow for aarch64 build

Dependencies

  • #957 build(deps-dev): bump jest-junit from 15.0.0 to 16.0.0
  • #958 build(deps): bump openpgp from 5.7.0 to 5.8.0
  • #959 build(deps-dev): bump @​types/node from 18.15.10 to 18.15.12

3.1.2

Fixes

  • #718 Update README.md
  • #851 Remove unsupported path_to_write_report argument
  • #898 codeql-analysis.yml
  • #901 Update README to contain correct information - inputs and negate feature
  • #955 fix: add in all the extra arguments for uploader

Dependencies

  • #819 build(deps): bump openpgp from 5.4.0 to 5.5.0
  • #835 build(deps): bump node-fetch from 3.2.4 to 3.2.10
  • #840 build(deps): bump ossf/scorecard-action from 1.1.1 to 2.0.4
  • #841 build(deps): bump @​actions/core from 1.9.1 to 1.10.0
  • #843 build(deps): bump @​actions/github from 5.0.3 to 5.1.1
  • #869 build(deps): bump node-fetch from 3.2.10 to 3.3.0
  • #872 build(deps-dev): bump jest-junit from 13.2.0 to 15.0.0
  • #879 build(deps): bump decode-uri-component from 0.2.0 to 0.2.2

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Update Codecov GitHub Action from version 4 to 5 in the CI workflow.

Bumps [codecov/codecov-action](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action) from 4 to 5.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](codecov/codecov-action@v4...v5)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: codecov/codecov-action
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-major
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

Review changes with  SemanticDiff

Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR updates the Codecov GitHub Action from version 4 to version 5. The new version introduces significant changes including the use of the Codecov Wrapper to encapsulate the CLI, deprecation of some arguments, and addition of new features. The implementation is straightforward, requiring only a version bump in the GitHub Actions workflow file.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update Codecov GitHub Action version in the CI workflow
  • Bump codecov-action version from v4 to v5
  • Maintain existing configuration parameters which are still compatible with v5
.github/workflows/run-all-tests.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, dependabot[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!

Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented Nov 14, 2024

PR Summary

  • Codecov Action Update in GitHub Workflow
    We've updated to a newer version of Codecov (version 5), which is a tool we use in our Github Actions workflow. This tool analyzes and reports how thoroughly our coding tests are covering our software's functionality. This update will ensure we have the latest features, improvements and security updates from the tool.

Copy link

Failed to generate code suggestions for PR

Copy link

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Nov 14, 2024

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

(Checks updated until commit 9fe1ae9)

Action: cpython-lxml (3.11)

Failed stage: Upload coverage to Codecov [❌]

Failure summary:

The action failed because the Codecov create-commit process was unable to complete due to a missing
token.

  • The error message indicates that a token is required because the branch is protected.
  • The process exited with an HTTP Error 400, specifying that a token is necessary for the operation.

  • Relevant error logs:
    1:  ##[group]Operating System
    2:  Ubuntu
    ...
    
    275:  tests/validator_test.py ........                                         [ 97%]
    276:  tests/views_test.py ..............                                       [100%]
    277:  ---------- coverage: platform linux, python 3.11.10-final-0 ----------
    278:  Coverage XML written to file coverage.xml
    279:  Required test coverage of 95% reached. Total coverage: 100.00%
    280:  ======================= 679 passed in 198.66s (0:03:18) ========================
    281:  ##[group]Run codecov/codecov-action@v5
    282:  with:
    283:  fail_ci_if_error: true
    ...
    
    352:  CC_CODE: 
    353:  CC_DIR: 
    354:  CC_DISABLE_FILE_FIXES: false
    355:  CC_DISABLE_SEARCH: false
    356:  CC_DRY_RUN: false
    357:  CC_ENTERPRISE_URL: 
    358:  CC_ENV: 
    359:  CC_EXCLUDES: 
    360:  CC_FAIL_ON_ERROR: true
    ...
    
    411:  gpg: Good signature from "Codecov Uploader (Codecov Uploader Verification Key) <[email protected]>" [unknown]
    412:  gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
    413:  gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
    414:  Primary key fingerprint: 2703 4E7F DB85 0E0B BC2C  62FF 806B B28A ED77 9869
    415:  codecov: OK
    416:  �[0;32m==>�[0m CLI integrity verified
    417:  �[0;32m ->�[0m Token of length 0 detected
    418:  �[0;32m==>�[0m Running create-commit
    419:  �[0;36m./codecov --verbose create-commit --fail-on-error --git-service github�[0m
    420:  info - 2024-11-14 22:33:54,571 -- ci service found: github-actions
    421:  debug - 2024-11-14 22:33:54,574 -- versioning system found: <class 'codecov_cli.helpers.versioning_systems.GitVersioningSystem'>
    422:  debug - 2024-11-14 22:33:54,577 -- versioning system found: <class 'codecov_cli.helpers.versioning_systems.GitVersioningSystem'>
    423:  warning - 2024-11-14 22:33:54,580 -- No config file could be found. Ignoring config.
    424:  debug - 2024-11-14 22:33:54,580 -- No codecov_yaml found
    425:  debug - 2024-11-14 22:33:54,583 -- Starting create commit process --- {"verbose": true, "auto_load_params_from": null, "codecov_yml_path": null, "enterprise_url": null, "version": "cli-0.9.4", "command": "create-commit", "fail_on_error": true, "git_service": "github", "parent_sha": null, "pull_request_number": "386", "branch": "dependabot/github_actions/codecov/codecov-action-5", "commit_sha": "2162eb1da10a9a394cf7cc7313a8e7c17d6a46e9", "slug": "cleder/fastkml"}
    426:  info - 2024-11-14 22:33:55,024 -- Process Commit creating complete
    427:  debug - 2024-11-14 22:33:55,024 -- Commit creating result --- {"result": "RequestResult(error=RequestError(code='HTTP Error 400', params={}, description='{\"message\":\"Token required because branch is protected\"}\\n'), warnings=[], status_code=400, text='{\"message\":\"Token required because branch is protected\"}\\n')"}
    428:  error - 2024-11-14 22:33:55,024 -- Commit creating failed: {"message":"Token required because branch is protected"}
    429:  �[0;31m==> Failed to create-commit�[0m
    430:  �[0;31m    Exiting...�[0m
    431:  ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
    

    ✨ CI feedback usage guide:

    The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
    The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

    • Failed stage
    • Failed test name
    • Failure summary
    • Relevant error logs

    In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

    /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"
    

    where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

    Configuration options

    • enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
    • excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
    • enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
    • persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
    • final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

    See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

    Copy link

    Preparing review...

    Copy link

    @llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

    1. Change Overview

    1.1 Core Changes

    • Primary purpose and scope: This PR updates the Codecov GitHub Action from version 4 to 5 in the CI workflow.
    • Key components modified: The change is specifically in the .github/workflows/run-all-tests.yml file.
    • Cross-component impacts: This update affects the CI/CD pipeline, particularly the coverage reporting step.
    • Business value alignment: Ensures the CI pipeline uses the latest version of the Codecov Action, potentially improving performance and security.

    1.2 Technical Architecture

    • System design modifications: The CI/CD pipeline configuration is modified to use the latest version of the Codecov Action.
    • Component interaction changes: The interaction with the Codecov service will change due to the updated action.
    • Integration points impact: The integration with Codecov will be updated, potentially affecting how coverage reports are uploaded.
    • Dependency changes and implications: The dependency on the Codecov Action is updated, which may involve changes to the API or behavior of the action.

    2. Deep Technical Analysis

    2.1 Code Logic Analysis

    .github/workflows/run-all-tests.yml - "Upload coverage to Codecov"

    • Submitted PR Code:

      - name: "Upload coverage to Codecov"
        if: ${{ matrix.python-version==3.11 }}
      -  uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
      +  uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5
        with:
          fail_ci_if_error: true
          verbose: true
          token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
    • Analysis:

      • Current logic and potential issues: The update changes the version of the Codecov Action used in the CI pipeline. This could introduce compatibility issues or require adjustments to the existing configuration.
      • Edge cases and error handling: The PR includes a conditional check to ensure the action runs only for a specific Python version (3.11). This is preserved in the update.
      • **Cross-component impact **: The change affects the CI pipeline and how coverage reports are uploaded to Codecov.
      • **Business logic considerations **: The business logic remains the same, but the implementation details of the action might have changed, requiring verification.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:

      • Ensure that the new version of the action is compatible with the current pipeline configuration.
      • Verify that the token and other inputs are still valid and supported by the new version.
      • Confirm that the updated action does not introduce any breaking changes or deprecations that affect the pipeline.
    • **Improvement rationale **:

      • Technical benefits: Using the latest version ensures access to the latest features, bug fixes, and security updates.
      • Business value: Ensures the CI pipeline is up-to-date and maintains compatibility with external services.
      • Risk assessment: Potential compatibility issues need to be verified and addressed.

    2.2 Implementation Quality

    • Code Structure:

      • The change is straightforward and isolated to the CI configuration file.
      • The modularity and organization of the CI pipeline are maintained.
    • Error Handling:

      • The existing error handling in the pipeline is preserved.
      • Ensure that the new version of the action handles errors gracefully and provides meaningful logs.
    • Performance Considerations:

      • The performance impact is minimal as it only affects the coverage reporting step.
      • Ensure that the new version does not introduce performance bottlenecks or delays in the pipeline.

    3. Risk Assessment

    3.1 Critical Issues

    🔴 P0 (Must Fix):

    • Issue: Potential compatibility issues with the new version of the Codecov Action.
    • Impact:
      • Technical implications: The pipeline could fail if the new version introduces breaking changes.
      • Business consequences: Coverage reporting could be disrupted, affecting the ability to monitor code quality.
      • User experience effects: Developers may not receive timely coverage reports, impacting their workflow.
    • Resolution:
      • Verify compatibility with the new version.
      • Update the pipeline configuration as needed to accommodate any changes.
      • Test the pipeline thoroughly to ensure it works as expected with the new version.

    3.2 Important Improvements

    🟡 P1 (Should Fix):

    • Issue: Ensure that the new version of the action is configured correctly.
    • Current Impact:
      • Performance implications: Minimal impact expected.
      • Maintenance overhead: Ensure the pipeline remains maintainable with the new version.
      • Future scalability: Keeping dependencies up-to-date ensures better scalability and security.
    • Suggested Solution:
      • Implementation approach: Thoroughly review the release notes and migration guide for the new version.
      • Migration strategy: Update the pipeline configuration as needed.
      • Testing considerations: Run the pipeline with the new version and validate that coverage reports are uploaded correctly.

    3.3 Minor Suggestions

    🟢 P2 (Consider):

    • Area: Documentation updates.
    • Improvement Opportunity:
      • Code quality enhancement: Update the documentation to reflect the change in the Codecov Action version.
      • Best practice alignment: Ensure that the documentation is clear and up-to-date.
      • Documentation updates: Add a note about the version update and any relevant changes in the README or CI documentation.

    4. Requirements Analysis

    4.1 Functional Coverage

    • Requirements mapping:
      • Implemented features: The PR updates the Codecov Action version.
      • Missing elements: None identified.
      • Edge cases handling: The conditional check for the Python version is preserved.
    • Business Logic:
      • Use case coverage: The update ensures the CI pipeline uses the latest version of the Codecov Action.
      • Business rule implementation: The business logic remains the same, but the implementation details of the action might have changed.
      • Data flow correctness: The data flow for coverage reporting is preserved.

    4.2 Non-functional Aspects

    • Performance metrics:
      • The performance impact is minimal as it only affects the coverage reporting step.
    • Security considerations:
      • Ensure that the new version of the action does not introduce security vulnerabilities.
    • Scalability factors:
      • Keeping dependencies up-to-date ensures better scalability and security.
    • Maintainability aspects:
      • The change is straightforward and should not introduce significant maintenance overhead.

    5. Testing Strategy

    • Test Coverage:
      • Unit test requirements: Ensure that the pipeline configuration is tested with the new version of the Codecov Action.
      • Integration test scenarios: Test the end-to-end coverage reporting process to ensure it works as expected.
      • Edge case validation: Validate that the conditional check for the Python version still works correctly.
    • Quality Metrics:
      • Current coverage: Ensure that the pipeline continues to provide accurate coverage reports.
      • Critical paths: Test the critical paths in the CI pipeline to ensure they are not affected by the update.
      • Performance benchmarks: Monitor the performance of the pipeline to ensure it remains within acceptable limits.

    6. Final Assessment

    6.1 Key Action Items

    1. Critical Changes (P0):

      • Verify compatibility with the new version of the Codecov Action.
      • Update the pipeline configuration as needed to accommodate any changes.
      • Test the pipeline thoroughly to ensure it works as expected with the new version.
    2. Important Improvements (P1):

      • Thoroughly review the release notes and migration guide for the new version.
      • Update the pipeline configuration as needed.
      • Run the pipeline with the new version and validate that coverage reports are uploaded correctly.
    3. Suggested Enhancements (P2):

      • Update the documentation to reflect the change in the Codecov Action version.
      • Add a note about the version update and any relevant changes in the README or CI documentation.

    6.2 Overall Evaluation

    • Technical assessment: The update is straightforward but requires thorough testing to ensure compatibility and correctness.
    • Business impact: Ensures the CI pipeline uses the latest version of the Codecov Action, improving performance and security.
    • Risk evaluation: Potential compatibility issues need to be verified and addressed.
    • Implementation quality: The change is isolated and should have minimal impact on the overall system.

    @cleder cleder merged commit ac78a7e into develop Nov 15, 2024
    50 of 58 checks passed
    @cleder cleder deleted the dependabot/github_actions/codecov/codecov-action-5 branch November 15, 2024 19:01
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant