[pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate #382
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![pre-commit-ci[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/68672?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
updates: - [github.com/abravalheri/validate-pyproject: v0.22 → v0.23](abravalheri/validate-pyproject@v0.22...v0.23) - [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.7.2 → v0.7.3](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.7.2...v0.7.3) - [github.com/crate-ci/typos: v1.27.0 → typos-dict-v0.11.35](crate-ci/typos@v1.27.0...typos-dict-v0.11.35)
|
Review changes with |
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR updates several pre-commit hooks to their latest versions. The changes are implemented by modifying the version references in the .pre-commit-config.yaml file for validate-pyproject, ruff-pre-commit, and typos hooks. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
PR Summary
|
|
Failed to generate code suggestions for PR |
|
Preparing review... |
CI Failure Feedback 🧐
✨ CI feedback usage guide:The CI feedback tool (
In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: where Configuration options
See more information about the |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #382 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 99.17% 99.17%
========================================
Files 64 64
Lines 5321 5321
Branches 150 150
========================================
Hits 5277 5277
Misses 35 35
Partials 9 9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment:
- The PR updates the versions of several pre-commit hooks, specifically
validate-pyproject,ruff-pre-commit, andtypos. - This ensures the project benefits from the latest bug fixes, performance improvements, and new features provided by these hooks.
- The PR updates the versions of several pre-commit hooks, specifically
- Key components modified:
- The
.pre-commit-config.yamlfile is modified to update the versions of the pre-commit hooks.
- The
- Impact assessment:
- The updates are isolated to the pre-commit configuration file, so there are no direct changes to the core functionality of the project.
- System dependencies and integration impacts:
- The changes do not impact any integration points with existing systems.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications:
- None, as this is a configuration update.
- Component interactions:
- None, as this does not change how components interact.
- Integration points:
- None, as this does not affect any integration points.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- [.pre-commit-config.yaml]
- Submitted PR Code:
- repo: https://github.com/abravalheri/validate-pyproject - rev: v0.22 + rev: v0.23 hooks: - id: validate-pyproject - repo: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit - rev: 'v0.7.2' + rev: 'v0.7.3' hooks: - id: ruff - id: ruff-format - repo: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos - rev: v1.27.0 + rev: typos-dict-v0.11.35 hooks: - id: typos
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues:
- The current logic updates the versions of the pre-commit hooks.
- No apparent issues with the logic itself.
- Edge cases and error handling:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
- Cross-component impact:
- None, as this change is isolated to the pre-commit configuration file.
- Business logic considerations:
- Ensures the project uses the latest versions of pre-commit hooks, which can include bug fixes, performance improvements, and new features.
- Current logic and potential issues:
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
- No improvements needed for the submitted code itself, as it is a straightforward configuration update.
- Improvement rationale:
- Not applicable, as the submitted code is correct and serves its purpose.
- Submitted PR Code:
2.2 Implementation Quality
- Code organization and structure:
- The changes are well-organized and modular, as they only update the versions of the pre-commit hooks.
- Design patterns usage:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
- Error handling approach:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
- Resource management:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
3. Critical Findings
3.1 Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues:
- No critical issues identified.
-
🟡 Warnings:
- Warning description: Ensure compatibility of the updated pre-commit hooks with the project.
- Potential risks: Incompatibility may introduce new issues or break existing functionality.
- Suggested improvements: Run the pre-commit hooks and verify that they function as expected. If any issues arise, roll back to the previous versions by reverting the changes in the
.pre-commit-config.yamlfile.
3.2 Code Quality Concerns
- Maintainability aspects:
- The changes are straightforward and easy to maintain.
- Readability issues:
- None identified.
- Performance bottlenecks:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
4. Security Assessment
4.1 Security Considerations
- Data handling concerns:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
- Input validation:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
- Security best practices:
- Ensure that the updated versions of the pre-commit hooks do not introduce any new vulnerabilities.
4.2 Vulnerability Analysis
- Potential security risks:
- None identified.
- Mitigation strategies:
- Review the change logs of the updated hooks and ensure that they are from trusted sources.
- Security testing requirements:
- Ensure that the updated versions of the pre-commit hooks are compatible with the project by running the pre-commit hooks and verifying that they function as expected.
5. Testing Strategy
5.1 Test Coverage
- Unit test analysis:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
- Integration test requirements:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
- Edge cases coverage:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
5.2 Test Recommendations
Suggested Test Cases
# Sample test case for pre-commit hook
- repo: local
hooks:
- id: test-pre-commit-hooks
name: Test pre-commit hooks
entry: ./test-pre-commit-hooks.sh
language: script
files: ^.+\.py$- Coverage improvements:
- None identified.
- Performance testing needs:
- Not applicable, as this is a configuration update.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
- Documentation updates needed:
- Document the updates in the project's release notes or changelog to ensure that the changes are transparent and traceable.
- Long-term maintenance considerations:
- The updates improve maintainability by ensuring that the project uses the latest versions of the pre-commit hooks.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements:
- The technical debt implications are minimal, as the changes are straightforward and isolated to the configuration file.
7. Deployment & Operations
- Deployment impact and strategy:
- The updates do not introduce any significant deployment impact. The changes are limited to the configuration file and do not alter the way the project is deployed.
- Key operational considerations:
- None identified.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Critical changes required:
- No critical changes identified.
- Important improvements suggested:
- Ensure compatibility of the updated pre-commit hooks with the project by running the pre-commit hooks and verifying that they function as expected.
- Best practices to implement:
- Review the change logs of the updated hooks and ensure that they are from trusted sources.
- Cross-cutting concerns to address:
- None identified.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path:
- Consider automating the process of updating the versions of the pre-commit hooks to ensure that the project always uses the latest versions.
- Business capability evolution:
- The updates ensure that the project benefits from the latest features and improvements provided by the pre-commit hooks.
- System integration impacts:
- None identified.
=== FINAL PR REVIEW COMMENT FORMAT ENDS ===
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
updates:
Summary by Sourcery
CI: