Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

previous version doesnt built artifacts for angry-omnibus-toolchain #286

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

muthuja
Copy link
Contributor

@muthuja muthuja commented Jun 21, 2024

Description

previous version 3.0.29 doesn't built angry omnibus-toolchain artifacts , so this is just to get a new version and built the artifacts

Related Issue

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Chore (non-breaking change that does not add functionality or fix an issue)

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have run the pre-merge tests locally and they pass.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • If Gemfile.lock has changed, I have used --conservative to do it and included the full output in the Description above.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • All commits have been signed-off for the Developer Certificate of Origin.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 21, 2024

@muthuja muthuja changed the title just to get a new version since angry-toolchain doesnt built artifact… since angry-toolchain doesnt built artifact… Jun 21, 2024
@muthuja muthuja changed the title since angry-toolchain doesnt built artifact… previous version doesnt built artifacts for angry-omnibus-toolchain Jun 21, 2024
@muthuja muthuja marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 06:46
@muthuja muthuja requested review from a team as code owners June 21, 2024 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant