Submit constraints only after commitments deadline + block template refactor #117
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes across the files primarily focus on enhancing the commitment and constraint handling logic within the Bolt Sidecar project. Significant updates include the introduction of parameters for Changes
Sequence DiagramsOld Flow (Commitment Submission)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Sidecar
participant MEVBoost
participant Builder
User->>Sidecar: Send transaction
Sidecar->>MEVBoost: Submit constraints
MEVBoost->>Builder: Forward constraints
Builder->>MEVBoost: Validate and respond
MEVBoost->>Sidecar: Receive validation
Sidecar->>User: Acknowledge receipt
New Flow (Commitment Submission After Deadline)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Sidecar
participant MEVBoost
participant Builder
User->>Sidecar: Send transaction
Sidecar->>Sidecar: Cache constraints
Sidecar->>MEVBoost: After deadline, submit constraints
MEVBoost->>Builder: Forward constraints
Builder->>MEVBoost: Validate and respond
MEVBoost->>Sidecar: Receive validation
Sidecar->>User: Acknowledge receipt
Assessment against linked issues
These validations ensure that the changes align with the primary objectives of the issues by adjusting the submission timing of constraints, checking balances and nonces before commitments, and clearing past states appropriately. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (7)
- bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/config/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (5 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (6 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (11 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (33)
bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (4)
1-2: New imports look good.The new imports for
AddressandTransactionSignedare necessary for the added fields and methods.
33-35: DerivingDefaultforSignedConstraintsis appropriate.This change is useful for creating default instances of the struct.
42-44: DerivingDefaultforConstraintsMessageand addingsenderparameter inbuildmethod are appropriate.These changes enhance the functionality and usability of the struct and method.
Also applies to: 54-61
92-97: Addingtx_decodedandsenderfields toConstraintand updatingfrom_inclusion_requestmethod are appropriate.These changes are necessary for the enhanced functionality related to transaction handling.
Also applies to: 102-114
bolt-sidecar/src/config/mod.rs (2)
4-4: New import forNonZerolooks good.This import is necessary for the changes to the
max_commitmentsandmax_commitments_per_slotfields.
43-43: Changes tomax_commitmentsandmax_commitments_per_slotfields are appropriate.Using
Option<NonZero<usize>>andNonZero<usize>ensures that the values are non-zero, which is important for the logic that relies on these fields.Also applies to: 127-133
bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (1)
35-35: DerivingDefaultforAccountStateis appropriate.This change is useful for creating default instances of the struct.
bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (6)
32-33: Passingmax_commitments_per_slottoExecutionState::newis appropriate.This change is necessary to initialize the
ExecutionStatewith the new parameter.
81-91: Callingcheck_commitment_validityto validate commitment request and retrieve sender is appropriate.This change enhances the validation logic by incorporating the sender information.
103-103: CallingConstraintsMessage::buildwith the newsenderparameter is appropriate.This change is necessary to include the sender information in the constraints message.
105-106: InitializingSignedConstraintswith message and signature is appropriate.This change is necessary to create a signed constraints instance.
107-107: Callingexecution_state.add_constraintto add signed constraints is appropriate.This change is necessary to update the execution state with the new constraints.
133-147: Callingmevboost_client.submit_constraintswith retry logic is appropriate.The retry logic ensures robustness in submitting constraints to the MEV-Boost client.
bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (8)
12-15: Import changes look good.The new imports are necessary for the added constraint-related functionality.
30-31: Struct changes look good.The new field
signed_constraints_listis necessary for storing the signed constraints associated with the block.
41-71: Method changes look good.The
add_constraintsmethod correctly updates the state diff and adds the signed constraints to the block template.
73-79: Method changes look good.The
transactionsmethod correctly returns a clone of all transactions from the signed constraints list.
83-87: Method changes look good.The
transactions_lenmethod correctly returns the length of the transactions in the block template.
91-99: Method changes look good.The
blob_countmethod correctly returns the blob count of the block template.
103-136: Method changes look good.The
remove_constraints_at_indexmethod correctly removes all signed constraints at the specified index and updates the state diff.
140-179: Method changes look good.The
retainmethod correctly removes any transactions that conflict with the given account state.bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (6)
70-71: Import changes look good.The
NonZerotype import is necessary for the newExecutionState::newmethod signature.
114-116: Test case changes look good.The
test_valid_inclusion_requesttest case correctly uses the newExecutionState::newmethod signature.
150-152: Test case changes look good.The
test_invalid_inclusion_request_noncetest case correctly uses the newExecutionState::newmethod signature.
189-191: Test case changes look good.The
test_invalid_inclusion_request_balancetest case correctly uses the newExecutionState::newmethod signature.
229-231: Test case changes look good.The
test_invalid_inclusion_request_basefeetest case correctly uses the newExecutionState::newmethod signature.
270-272: Test case changes look good.The
test_invalidate_inclusion_requesttest case correctly uses the newExecutionState::newmethod signature.bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (6)
4-5: Import changes look good.The
NonZerotype import is necessary for the newExecutionStatestruct and method signatures.
34-36: Enum changes look good.The new variant
MaxCommitmentsReachedForSlotis necessary for handling the newmax_commitments_per_slotparameter.
82-83: Struct changes look good.The new field
max_commitments_per_slotis necessary for handling the new parameter.
91-100: Method changes look good.The
newmethod correctly initializes theExecutionStatestruct with the newmax_commitments_per_slotparameter.
Line range hint
123-190:
Method changes look good.The
check_commitment_validitymethod correctly handles the newmax_commitments_per_slotparameter and validates the commitment request.
196-201: Method changes look good.The
add_constraintmethod correctly commits the transaction to the target block.
thedevbirb
force-pushed
the
fix/sidecar/constraints-deadline
branch
from
f82395c
to
260e7b5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (7)
- bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/config/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (5 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (6 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (11 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (33)
bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (6)
Line range hint
33-37:
LGTM!The
SignedConstraintsstruct is well-defined and follows the required serialization and deserialization traits.
Line range hint
42-52:
LGTM!The
ConstraintsMessagestruct is well-defined and follows the required serialization and deserialization traits.
54-63: LGTM!The
buildmethod correctly constructs theConstraintsMessagestruct from an inclusion request and metadata.
92-97: Verify the necessity of skipping fields during serialization.The
tx_decodedandsenderfields are skipped during serialization. Verify if these fields are needed for external use.
102-114: LGTM!The
from_inclusion_requestmethod correctly constructs theConstraintstruct from an inclusion request and metadata.
Line range hint
116-122:
LGTM!The
as_bytesmethod correctly converts theConstraintto a byte representation for signing.bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (1)
35-38: LGTM!The
AccountStatestruct is well-defined and follows the required traits.bolt-sidecar/src/config/mod.rs (1)
7-7: LGTM!The changes ensure that the commitment-related fields have valid non-zero values.
Also applies to: 46-46, 132-132, 138-138
bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (5)
31-32: LGTM!The
ExecutionStateinitialization now includes themax_commitments_per_slotparameter, ensuring proper configuration.
81-91: LGTM!The commitment request handling now includes validation and parsing of constraints, ensuring proper processing.
100-107: LGTM!The constraints are now parsed and signed with the sidecar signer, ensuring proper signing.
133-147: LGTM!The constraints are now submitted to MEV-Boost with retry logic, ensuring proper submission.
149-150: LGTM!The local payload is now built using the transactions from the block template, ensuring proper payload construction.
bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (8)
12-15: Imports look good.The new imports for
AccountState,Constraint, andSignedConstraintsare necessary and correctly used.
30-31: Struct definition update looks good.The addition of
signed_constraints_listto theBlockTemplatestruct is correctly defined and integrated.
41-71:add_constraintsmethod looks good.The method correctly handles the addition of signed constraints and updates the state diff.
73-79:transactionsmethod looks good.The method correctly retrieves and clones all transactions from the signed constraints list.
83-87:transactions_lenmethod looks good.The method correctly calculates the length of the transactions in the block template.
91-99:blob_countmethod looks good.The method correctly calculates the blob count of the block template.
103-136:remove_constraints_at_indexmethod looks good.The method correctly handles the removal of signed constraints and updates the state diff.
140-179:retainmethod looks good.The method correctly identifies and removes transactions that conflict with the given account state.
bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (6)
71-72: Imports look good.The new import for
NonZerois necessary and correctly used.
116-118:test_valid_inclusion_requesttest case looks good.The test case correctly initializes
ExecutionStatewith themax_commitments_per_slotparameter and validates the expected behavior.
152-154:test_invalid_inclusion_request_noncetest case looks good.The test case correctly initializes
ExecutionStatewith themax_commitments_per_slotparameter and validates the expected behavior.
191-193:test_invalid_inclusion_request_balancetest case looks good.The test case correctly initializes
ExecutionStatewith themax_commitments_per_slotparameter and validates the expected behavior.
231-233:test_invalid_inclusion_request_basefeetest case looks good.The test case correctly initializes
ExecutionStatewith themax_commitments_per_slotparameter and validates the expected behavior.
272-274:test_invalidate_inclusion_requesttest case looks good.The test case correctly initializes
ExecutionStatewith themax_commitments_per_slotparameter and validates the expected behavior.bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (6)
4-5: Imports look good.The new import for
NonZerois necessary and correctly used.
82-83: Struct definition update looks good.The addition of
max_commitments_per_slotto theExecutionStatestruct is correctly defined and integrated.
91-100:newmethod looks good.The method correctly initializes
ExecutionStatewith themax_commitments_per_slotparameter.
Line range hint
123-190:
check_commitment_validitymethod looks good.The method correctly checks the validity of commitments with respect to the
max_commitments_per_slotparameter.
196-201:add_constraintmethod looks good.The method correctly handles the addition of signed constraints to the block template.
Line range hint
237-244:
refresh_templatesmethod looks good.The method correctly refreshes the block templates and retains only valid signed constraints based on the canonical account states.
thedevbirb
force-pushed
the
fix/sidecar/constraints-deadline
branch
from
260e7b5
to
48a471e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (7)
- bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/config/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (5 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (6 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (11 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (27)
bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (4)
1-2: LGTM! New imports are appropriate.The imports for
AddressandTransactionSignedare necessary for the new fields added to theConstraintstruct.
Line range hint
33-37:
LGTM!SignedConstraintsstruct addition is appropriate.The
SignedConstraintsstruct is essential for handling signed constraints and includes necessary serialization and debugging traits.
Line range hint
42-60:
LGTM!ConstraintsMessagestruct andbuildmethod addition is appropriate.The
ConstraintsMessagestruct and itsbuildmethod, which includes a newsenderparameter, are crucial for creating constraint messages with the sender's address.
92-114: LGTM!Constraintstruct andfrom_inclusion_requestmethod updates are appropriate.The new fields
tx_decodedandsenderin theConstraintstruct, along with the updatedfrom_inclusion_requestmethod to include thesenderparameter, are necessary for internal use and to capture the sender's address.bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
35-39:
LGTM!AccountStatestruct addition is appropriate.The
AccountStatestruct is essential for handling minimal account state needed for commitment validation and includes necessary serialization and debugging traits.bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (5)
31-32: LGTM!ExecutionStateinitialization update is appropriate.The
ExecutionStateinitialization now includesconfig.limits.max_commitments_per_slot, ensuring that the maximum number of commitments per slot is properly configured.
81-91: LGTM! Commitment validity check addition is appropriate.The new code checks the validity of the commitment and retrieves the sender's address, ensuring the validity of commitments before processing them.
102-107: LGTM! Constraints message creation and signing is appropriate.The new code creates a constraints message and signs it with the sidecar signer, which is necessary for processing and signing constraints messages.
133-147: LGTM! Retry logic for submitting constraints is appropriate.The new code includes retry logic for submitting constraints to
mevboost_client, ensuring successful submission of constraints even in the face of transient errors.
150-150: LGTM! Local payload building addition is appropriate.The new code builds a new local payload at the slot deadline, ensuring that local payloads are built and submitted on time.
bolt-sidecar/src/config/mod.rs (2)
7-7: LGTM! Field updates are appropriate.The
max_commitmentsfield is updated to useNonZero<usize>, and themax_commitments_per_slotfield is updated to useNonZero<usize>and is now required, ensuring that the values are non-zero and preventing invalid configurations.Also applies to: 49-49
139-145: LGTM!Limitsstruct update is appropriate.The
Limitsstruct is updated to useNonZero<usize>formax_commitments_per_slot, with a default value of 6, ensuring that the value is non-zero and providing a sensible default.bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (7)
41-71: LGTM! Ensure the state diffs are accurately updated.The function implementation looks good, but please ensure that the state diffs are accurately updated and that the constraints are correctly added.
73-79: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly returns a vector of transactions from the signed constraints list.
83-87: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly returns the length of the transactions in the block template.
91-99: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly returns the count of EIP-4844 transactions in the block template.
103-136: LGTM! Ensure the state diffs are accurately updated.The function implementation looks good, but please ensure that the state diffs are accurately updated and that the constraints are correctly removed.
140-179: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly retains only the valid transactions by checking the account state.
Line range hint
263-267: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly returns a tuple of the nonce and balance diff for the given address.
bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (1)
116-118: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly initializes the
ExecutionStatewith a newmax_commitments_per_slotparameter.bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (7)
34-36: LGTM!The addition of the new variant
MaxCommitmentsReachedForSlotin theValidationErrorenum looks good and aligns with the changes in theExecutionState.
94-104: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly initializes the
ExecutionStatewith a newmax_commitments_per_slotparameter.
Line range hint
127-194: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly validates the commitment request against the state and checks for maximum commitments per slot.
200-205: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly adds constraints to the block template.
Line range hint
249-253: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly refreshes the block templates with the latest account states and removes any invalid transactions.
Line range hint
256-267: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly returns the account state for the given address, including any intermediate block templates state.
Line range hint
270-272: LGTM!The function implementation looks good and correctly gets the block template for the given slot number and removes it from the cache.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (8)
- bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/api/builder.rs (4 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/api/spec.rs (2 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/client/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/client/test_util/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (7 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/head_tracker.rs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (23)
bolt-sidecar/src/client/mod.rs (1)
8-10: LGTM!The re-export of
BeaconClientand the addition of thetest_utilmodule under test configuration are appropriate and don't introduce any issues.bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (1)
35-37: LGTM!The addition of the
AccountStatestruct with a default implementation is correct and aligns with the requirement for minimal account state needed for commitment validation.bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (3)
31-32: LGTM!The initialization of
ExecutionStatewithconfig.limits.max_commitments_per_slotensures that themax_commitments_per_slotlimit is correctly passed to theExecutionState.
81-91: LGTM!The addition of the
check_commitment_validitymethod call ensures that the commitment is validated before proceeding, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the commitments.
102-110: LGTM!The addition of constraints signing and submission logic ensures that the constraints are signed and added to the
ExecutionStatecorrectly. The retry logic for submitting constraints tomevboost_clientis also handled appropriately.Also applies to: 132-146
bolt-sidecar/src/api/builder.rs (1)
38-40: LGTM!The addition of the
BuilderProxyServerstruct provides a proxy server for the builder API, forwarding requests to the target after interception. The fieldsproxy_target,local_payload, andpayload_fetcherare correctly initialized.bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (4)
85-86: LGTM!The addition of the
max_commitments_per_slotfield to theExecutionStatestruct ensures that the maximum number of commitments per slot is tracked.
94-104: LGTM!The initialization of
ExecutionStatewithmax_commitments_per_slotensures that themax_commitments_per_slotlimit is correctly passed to theExecutionState.
Line range hint
127-194:
LGTM!The addition of the
check_commitment_validitymethod ensures that the commitment is validated before proceeding, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the commitments.
200-205: LGTM!The addition of the
add_constraintandrefresh_templatesmethods ensures that constraints are handled correctly and block templates are refreshed with the latest account states.Also applies to: 247-249
bolt-sidecar/src/client/test_util/mod.rs (5)
1-32: LGTM! Imports and utility function are appropriate.The imports are relevant and the
make_get_payload_responsefunction correctly creates a defaultGetPayloadResponse.
34-43: LGTM!MockMevBooststruct and its implementation are correct.The
MockMevBooststruct and itsnewfunction are correctly implemented for creating a mock MEV boost client.
45-79: LGTM!BuilderApiimplementation forMockMevBoostis correct.The methods return appropriate mock responses, ensuring the mock client behaves as expected.
81-100: LGTM!ConstraintsApiimplementation forMockMevBoostis correct.The methods return appropriate mock responses, ensuring the mock client behaves as expected.
102-110: LGTM! Test function is correct.The test function correctly reads and parses the JSON file, ensuring the
GetPayloadResponsecan be deserialized.bolt-sidecar/src/state/head_tracker.rs (4)
Line range hint
1-15:
LGTM! Imports andHeadTrackerstruct are appropriate.The imports are relevant and the
HeadTrackerstruct is correctly defined for tracking the most recent head of the beacon chain.
Line range hint
16-22:
LGTM!NewHeadsTopicstruct and its implementation are correct.The
NewHeadsTopicstruct is correctly implemented for subscribing to new head events.
Line range hint
23-74:
LGTM!HeadTrackerimplementation and logging updates are correct.The
HeadTrackerimplementation includes methods for starting, stopping, and subscribing to new head events. The logging messages have been correctly updated to include retry indications.
Line range hint
75-100:
LGTM! Test function is correct.The test function correctly initializes a
HeadTrackerand fetches the next head event, ensuring the tracker works as expected.bolt-sidecar/src/api/spec.rs (4)
Line range hint
1-29:
LGTM! Imports and API paths are appropriate.The imports are relevant and the API paths are correctly defined for the builder and constraints APIs.
Line range hint
30-45:
LGTM!ErrorResponsestruct and helper function are appropriate.The
ErrorResponsestruct and the helper function are correctly implemented for error handling.
Line range hint
46-117:
LGTM!BuilderApiErrorenum and itsIntoResponseimplementation are correct.The
BuilderApiErrorenum and itsIntoResponseimplementation are correctly updated to include and handle the newGenericvariant.
Line range hint
118-153:
LGTM!BuilderApiandConstraintsApitraits are appropriate.The
BuilderApiandConstraintsApitraits are correctly defined for the builder and constraints APIs.
thedevbirb
added
C: bolt-sidecar
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range comments (1)
bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (1)
Line range hint
147-226: Usereq.slotin the error message forMaxCommitmentsReachedForSlot.The error message for
MaxCommitmentsReachedForSlotshould usereq.slotinstead ofself.max_commitments_per_slot.get().- return Err(ValidationError::MaxCommitmentsReachedForSlot( - self.max_commitments_per_slot.get(), - )); + return Err(ValidationError::MaxCommitmentsReachedForSlot(req.slot));
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (12)
- bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (4 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/builder/state_root.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/client/rpc.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/common.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/crypto/bls.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/commitment.rs (4 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (5 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (5 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (10 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/fetcher.rs (4 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (16 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (38)
bolt-sidecar/src/common.rs (2)
Line range hint
32-39:
LGTM!The function
max_transaction_costhas been correctly updated to usePooledTransactionsElement.
Line range hint
46-58:
LGTM!The function
validate_transactionhas been correctly updated to usePooledTransactionsElement.bolt-sidecar/src/builder/state_root.rs (1)
Line range hint
17-79:
LGTM!The test function
test_trace_callis well-implemented. It includes initialization, tracing, and state root verification.bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rs (5)
Line range hint
33-38:
LGTM!The
SignedConstraintsstruct is correctly implemented.
Line range hint
42-49:
LGTM!The
ConstraintsMessagestruct is correctly implemented.
54-62: LGTM!The
buildfunction is correctly updated to include thesenderparameter.
93-94: LGTM!The
senderfield is correctly added to theConstraintstruct.
99-107: LGTM!The
from_transactionfunction is correctly updated to include thesenderparameter.bolt-sidecar/src/crypto/bls.rs (1)
65-70: LGTM!The
randommethod in theSignerstruct is correctly implemented.bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/commitment.rs (4)
5-5: Verify the usage ofPooledTransactionsElement.Ensure that
PooledTransactionsElementis correctly used and integrated with the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
Verify the usage of
PooledTransactionsElement.The usage of
PooledTransactionsElementappears to be consistent and correctly integrated across various files in the codebase. The changes seem to be correctly applied without any issues.
common.rsmod.rsstate/mod.rsstate/execution.rsconstraint.rscommitment.rsbuilder/template.rsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `PooledTransactionsElement` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `PooledTransactionsElement`. Expect: Correct integration and usage. rg --type rust 'PooledTransactionsElement'Length of output: 4205
85-85: Verify the correctness of thedigestmethod.Ensure that the
digestmethod correctly computes the hash by includingtx.hash().
85-85: Ensure correct integration of thesenderfield inConstraint.The
senderfield should be correctly integrated and utilized in theConstraintstruct.Verification successful
Verified integration of the
senderfield inConstraint.The
senderfield is correctly integrated and utilized in theConstraintstruct and theConstraintsMessage::buildmethod.
Constraintstruct includes asenderfield.ConstraintsMessage::buildmethod uses thesenderfield to create aConstraintinstance.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the `sender` field in `Constraint`. # Test: Search for the usage of `Constraint` and ensure the `sender` field is correctly utilized. rg --type rust 'Constraint'Length of output: 4689
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the `sender` field in `Constraint`. # Search for the definition of the `Constraint` struct and inspect its fields. rg --type rust 'pub struct Constraint' -A 10 # Search for the `build` method in `ConstraintsMessage` to see how the `sender` field is integrated. rg --type rust 'impl ConstraintsMessage' -A 20Length of output: 4004
37-37: Ensure correct integration of thesenderfield inConstraintsMessage.The
senderfield should be correctly integrated and utilized in theConstraintsMessagestruct.Verification successful
The
senderfield is correctly integrated and utilized inConstraintsMessage.
- The
senderfield is passed to theConstraint::from_transactionmethod and stored in theConstraintstruct.- The
ConstraintsMessagestruct uses this method to create constraints with thesenderfield.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the `sender` field in `ConstraintsMessage`. # Test: Search for the usage of `ConstraintsMessage` and ensure the `sender` field is correctly utilized. rg --type rust 'ConstraintsMessage'Length of output: 1178
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition and methods of `ConstraintsMessage` to verify the integration of the `sender` field. # Extract the definition of `ConstraintsMessage` rg --type rust -A 20 'pub struct ConstraintsMessage' | sed '/^$/q' # Extract methods of `ConstraintsMessage` rg --type rust 'impl ConstraintsMessage' -A 20Length of output: 3180
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the definition and methods of `Constraint` to verify the utilization of the `sender` field. # Extract the definition of `Constraint` rg --type rust -A 20 'pub struct Constraint' | sed '/^$/q' # Extract methods of `Constraint` rg --type rust 'impl Constraint' -A 20Length of output: 10545
bolt-sidecar/src/state/fetcher.rs (2)
163-165: Ensure correct implementation ofget_blob_basefeemethod inStateClient.The
get_blob_basefeemethod should be correctly implemented and integrated in theStateClientstruct.Verification successful
The
get_blob_basefeemethod is correctly implemented and integrated within theStateClientstruct.
- The method is defined and used in
bolt-sidecar/src/state/fetcher.rs.- It is also referenced in
bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsandbolt-sidecar/src/client/rpc.rs.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and integration of the `get_blob_basefee` method in `StateClient`. # Test: Search for the usage of `StateClient` and ensure the `get_blob_basefee` method is correctly utilized. rg --type rust 'StateClient'Length of output: 1408
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `get_blob_basefee` method in the relevant files. # Test: Search for the usage of `get_blob_basefee` method in the relevant files. rg --type rust 'get_blob_basefee' bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rsLength of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `get_blob_basefee` method in the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `get_blob_basefee` method in the entire codebase. rg --type rust 'get_blob_basefee'Length of output: 734
36-37: Ensure correct definition ofget_blob_basefeemethod inStateFetchertrait.The
get_blob_basefeemethod should be correctly defined and integrated in theStateFetchertrait.Verification successful
The
get_blob_basefeemethod is correctly defined, implemented, and integrated.
- The method is defined in the
StateFetchertrait inbolt-sidecar/src/state/fetcher.rs.- It is implemented in the
StateClientstruct.- It is used in the
ExecutionStatestruct inbolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and integration of the `get_blob_basefee` method in `StateFetcher` trait. # Test: Search for the usage of `StateFetcher` trait and ensure the `get_blob_basefee` method is correctly utilized. rg --type rust 'StateFetcher'Length of output: 306
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition, implementation, and usage of the `get_blob_basefee` method in the `StateFetcher` trait. # Test: Check the definition of `get_blob_basefee` method in `StateFetcher` trait. rg --type rust 'get_blob_basefee' -A 5 bolt-sidecar/src/state/fetcher.rs # Test: Check the implementation of `get_blob_basefee` method in `StateClient`. rg --type rust 'get_blob_basefee' -A 10 bolt-sidecar/src/state/fetcher.rs # Test: Check the usage of `get_blob_basefee` method in the `ExecutionState` struct. rg --type rust 'get_blob_basefee' -A 10 bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsLength of output: 2421
bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs (5)
31-31: Ensure correct handling ofsigned_constraints_list.The
signed_constraints_listshould be correctly handled and integrated with the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
Correct handling of
signed_constraints_listverified.The
signed_constraints_listis correctly handled and integrated within the codebase, as evidenced by its usage in various methods and operations.
bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs: Multiple methods manipulate and accesssigned_constraints_list.bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs: Used in constraint submission logic.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of `signed_constraints_list` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `signed_constraints_list`. Expect: Correct handling and integration. rg --type rust 'signed_constraints_list'Length of output: 838
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract more context around each usage of `signed_constraints_list` to verify its handling. # Extract 5 lines before and after each match to understand the context of usage. rg --type rust 'signed_constraints_list' -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 6661
73-82: Ensure correct calculation ofblob_count.The
blob_countmethod should correctly calculate the blob count of the block template.
121-159: Verify the correctness of theretainmethod.Ensure that the
retainmethod correctly removes any transactions that conflict with the given account state.
10-10: Verify the usage ofPooledTransactionsElementandTransactionSigned.Ensure that
PooledTransactionsElementandTransactionSignedare correctly used and integrated with the rest of the codebase.
40-47: Verify the correctness of thetransactionsmethod.Ensure that the
transactionsmethod correctly returns the cloned list of transactions from the constraints.bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (4)
109-109: Ensure correct implementation ofadd_constraintmethod.The
add_constraintmethod should be correctly implemented and integrated to add constraints to the execution state.Verification successful
Implementation and integration of
add_constraintmethod are correct.The
add_constraintmethod is correctly implemented inbolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsand properly integrated with theadd_constraintsmethod inbolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs.
bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs:232-240: Implementation ofadd_constraint.bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs:89-103: Implementation ofadd_constraints.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and integration of the `add_constraint` method. # Test: Search for the usage of `add_constraint` and ensure it is correctly utilized. rg --type rust 'add_constraint'Length of output: 780
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather implementation details of `add_constraint` and related method `add_constraints`. # Fetch the implementation of `add_constraint` in `bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs` ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'pub fn add_constraint(&mut self, target_slot: u64, signed_constraints: SignedConstraints) { $$$ }' # Fetch the implementation of `add_constraints` in `bolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rs` ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'pub fn add_constraints(&mut self, constraints: SignedConstraints) { $$$ }'Length of output: 2261
137-148: Ensure robust submission of constraints tomevboost_client.The submission logic for constraints to
mevboost_clientshould be robust and handle retries correctly.Verification successful
Ensure robust submission of constraints to
mevboost_client.The submission logic for constraints to
mevboost_clientis robust. Thesubmit_constraintsmethod sends a POST request with the constraints and checks the response status. If the status is not OK, it returns a custom error type. The retry logic insidecar.rshandles transient errors effectively by retrying the submission.
bolt-sidecar/src/client/mevboost.rs:
submit_constraintsmethod implementation confirms error handling and response status checks.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the submission logic for constraints to `mevboost_client`. # Test: Search for the usage of `submit_constraints` and ensure the submission logic is robust. rg --type rust 'submit_constraints'Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the `submit_constraints` method from `mevboost.rs`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'async fn submit_constraints($$_) { $$$ }' --debug bolt-sidecar/src/client/mevboost.rsLength of output: 337
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the `submit_constraints` method from `mevboost.rs`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'async fn submit_constraints($$_) { $$$ }' --debug-query bolt-sidecar/src/client/mevboost.rsLength of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the definition of the `submit_constraints` method in `mevboost.rs` and include context lines. rg 'async fn submit_constraints' -A 20 bolt-sidecar/src/client/mevboost.rsLength of output: 722
31-32: Verify the initialization ofExecutionStatewithmax_commitments_per_slot.Ensure that
ExecutionStateis correctly initialized withmax_commitments_per_slot.Verification successful
Verify the initialization of
ExecutionStatewithmax_commitments_per_slot.The
ExecutionState::newmethod correctly initializes themax_commitments_per_slotparameter, ensuring consistency with the rest of the codebase.
bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs: Correctly initializesExecutionStatewithmax_commitments_per_slot.bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs: Thenewmethod acceptsmax_commitments_per_slotand initializes it properly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of `ExecutionState` with `max_commitments_per_slot`. # Test: Search for the usage of `ExecutionState` and ensure it is correctly initialized. rg --type rust 'ExecutionState'Length of output: 1323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definition of `ExecutionState::new` to verify its initialization. # Test: Search for the definition of `ExecutionState::new`. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'impl<C: StateFetcher> ExecutionState<C> { pub async fn new($_, $_) -> Result<$_, $_> { $$$ } }'Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definition of `ExecutionState::new` to verify its initialization. # Test: Search for the `new` method within the `ExecutionState` implementation block. rg 'impl<C: StateFetcher> ExecutionState<C> {[^}]*fn new' -A 20 bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsLength of output: 277
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definition of `ExecutionState::new` to verify its initialization. # Test: Search for the `new` method within the `ExecutionState` implementation block. rg 'impl<C: StateFetcher> ExecutionState<C> \{[^}]*fn new' -A 20 bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsLength of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the definition of `ExecutionState::new` to verify its initialization. # Test: Search for any `new` method within the `ExecutionState` implementation block. rg 'fn new' -A 20 bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsLength of output: 714
82-92: Ensure correct implementation ofvalidate_commitment_requestmethod.The
validate_commitment_requestmethod should be correctly implemented and integrated to validate the commitment request.Verification successful
The
validate_commitment_requestmethod is correctly implemented and integrated.The method includes comprehensive validation checks and is well-integrated into the codebase, with multiple test cases ensuring its correctness.
bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs: Implementation ofvalidate_commitment_request.bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs: Multiple test cases validating different scenarios.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation and integration of the `validate_commitment_request` method. # Test: Search for the usage of `validate_commitment_request` and ensure it is correctly utilized. rg --type rust 'validate_commitment_request'Length of output: 810
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the `validate_commitment_request` method from `bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs` ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'pub async fn validate_commitment_request($_, $_) { $$$ }' # Extract the context of the usage of `validate_commitment_request` in `bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs` rg --type rust -A 5 'validate_commitment_request' bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rsLength of output: 1482
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of the `validate_commitment_request` method from `bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs` rg --type rust -A 20 'pub async fn validate_commitment_request' bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsLength of output: 964
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract additional lines from the implementation of the `validate_commitment_request` method in `bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs` rg --type rust -A 40 'pub async fn validate_commitment_request' bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsLength of output: 1973
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract additional lines from the implementation of the `validate_commitment_request` method in `bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs` rg --type rust -A 60 'pub async fn validate_commitment_request' bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsLength of output: 2818
bolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rs (2)
224-230: LGTM!The
TransactionExttrait definition looks good.
232-259: LGTM!The implementation of
TransactionExtforPooledTransactionsElementlooks good.bolt-sidecar/src/state/mod.rs (8)
Line range hint
22-44: LGTM!The
CommitmentDeadlinestruct and its methods look good.
Line range hint
71-87: LGTM!The
test_commitment_deadlinetest case looks good.
Line range hint
117-143: LGTM!The
test_valid_inclusion_requesttest case looks good.
Line range hint
153-180: LGTM!The
test_invalid_inclusion_request_noncetest case looks good.
Line range hint
192-220: LGTM!The
test_invalid_inclusion_request_balancetest case looks good.
Line range hint
232-261: LGTM!The
test_invalid_inclusion_request_basefeetest case looks good.
Line range hint
270-342: LGTM!The
test_invalidate_inclusion_requesttest case looks good.
346-406: LGTM!The
test_invalidate_stale_templatetest case looks good.bolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rs (4)
105-122: LGTM!The
newmethod looks good.
232-237: LGTM!The
add_constraintmethod looks good.
253-260: LGTM!The
update_headmethod looks good.
Line range hint
282-289: LGTM!The
refresh_templatesmethod looks good.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: merklefruit <[email protected]>
…t slot for which I request a preconf Co-authored-by: merklefruit <[email protected]>
…und/bolt-v0 into fix/sidecar/constraints-deadline
thedevbirb
force-pushed
the
fix/sidecar/constraints-deadline
branch
from
8940909
to
0d1ce4a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-sidecar/src/client/rpc.rs (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
bolt-sidecar/bin/sidecar.rs (3)
31-32: Initialization ofExecutionStatewith new parameter.The addition of
config.limits.max_commitments_per_slotto theExecutionStateconstructor aligns with the objective to manage constraints more effectively. This change should help in enforcing limits on the number of commitments per slot, as described in issue #109.
81-85: Enhanced validation for commitment requests.The addition of
execution_state.validate_commitment_request(&request)is a crucial update for ensuring that constraints are only submitted after thorough validation. This aligns with the objectives from issue #109 and #102 to enhance the reliability and correctness of transaction handling.
146-146: Error handling in local payload building.The error handling here is critical, especially since it's marked as "CRITICAL". This suggests that failing to build a local payload at the slot deadline could have significant negative impacts. Ensure that there are adequate fallback mechanisms or recovery strategies in place.
Verification successful
Adequate fallback mechanisms identified.
The
build_new_local_payloadmethod includes a fallback mechanism by attempting to build a fallback payload usingself.fallback_builder.build_fallback_payload(&transactions).await?. This indicates that there is a strategy in place to handle errors during the payload building process.
- Location:
bolt-sidecar/src/builder/mod.rsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that adequate error handling or fallback mechanisms are in place for building local payloads. # Test: Search for error handling strategies in local builder. Expect: Fallback mechanisms or recovery strategies. rg --type rust -A 5 $'tracing::error'Length of output: 11348
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the implementation of the `build_new_local_payload` method in the `local_builder` to verify error handling and fallback mechanisms. # Find the implementation of the `build_new_local_payload` method. ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'impl $_ { async fn build_new_local_payload(&self, $_) -> $_ { $$$ } }'Length of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the `build_new_local_payload` method in the codebase to verify error handling and fallback mechanisms. # Search for the `build_new_local_payload` method definition. rg 'async fn build_new_local_payload' -A 10Length of output: 827
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the full implementation of the `build_new_local_payload` method to verify error handling and fallback mechanisms. # Extract the full implementation of the `build_new_local_payload` method. rg 'pub async fn build_new_local_payload' -A 50 bolt-sidecar/src/builder/mod.rsLength of output: 2240
| let Some(template) = execution_state.remove_block_template(slot) else { | ||
| tracing::warn!("No block template found for slot {slot} when requested"); | ||
| continue; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| if let Err(e) = local_builder.build_new_local_payload(template.transactions).await { | ||
| tracing::trace!(?template.signed_constraints_list, "Submitting constraints to MEV-Boost"); | ||
|
|
||
| // TODO: fix retry logic, and move this to separate task | ||
| let max_retries = 5; | ||
| let mut i = 0; | ||
| 'inner: while let Err(e) = mevboost_client | ||
| .submit_constraints(&template.signed_constraints_list) | ||
| .await | ||
| { | ||
| tracing::error!(err = ?e, "Error submitting constraints, retrying..."); | ||
| tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(100)).await; | ||
| i+=1; | ||
| if i >= max_retries { | ||
| tracing::error!("Max retries reached while submitting to MEV-Boost"); | ||
| break 'inner | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor retry logic for constraint submission.
The retry logic for submitting constraints is critical but the implementation can be improved. Making retry parameters configurable, as suggested in the previous review, would allow the system to adapt better to various network conditions.
- let max_retries = 5;
- let mut i = 0;
+ let max_retries = config.retry.max_retries;
+ let mut i = config.retry.initial_retry_count;
- tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(100)).await;
+ tokio::time::sleep(config.retry.retry_delay).await;Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let Some(template) = execution_state.remove_block_template(slot) else { | |
| tracing::warn!("No block template found for slot {slot} when requested"); | |
| continue; | |
| }; | |
| if let Err(e) = local_builder.build_new_local_payload(template.transactions).await { | |
| tracing::trace!(?template.signed_constraints_list, "Submitting constraints to MEV-Boost"); | |
| // TODO: fix retry logic, and move this to separate task | |
| let max_retries = 5; | |
| let mut i = 0; | |
| 'inner: while let Err(e) = mevboost_client | |
| .submit_constraints(&template.signed_constraints_list) | |
| .await | |
| { | |
| tracing::error!(err = ?e, "Error submitting constraints, retrying..."); | |
| tokio::time::sleep(Duration::from_millis(100)).await; | |
| i+=1; | |
| if i >= max_retries { | |
| tracing::error!("Max retries reached while submitting to MEV-Boost"); | |
| break 'inner | |
| } | |
| } | |
| let Some(template) = execution_state.remove_block_template(slot) else { | |
| tracing::warn!("No block template found for slot {slot} when requested"); | |
| continue; | |
| }; | |
| tracing::trace!(?template.signed_constraints_list, "Submitting constraints to MEV-Boost"); | |
| // TODO: fix retry logic, and move this to separate task | |
| let max_retries = config.retry.max_retries; | |
| let mut i = config.retry.initial_retry_count; | |
| 'inner: while let Err(e) = mevboost_client | |
| .submit_constraints(&template.signed_constraints_list) | |
| .await | |
| { | |
| tracing::error!(err = ?e, "Error submitting constraints, retrying..."); | |
| tokio::time::sleep(config.retry.retry_delay).await; | |
| i+=1; | |
| if i >= max_retries { | |
| tracing::error!("Max retries reached while submitting to MEV-Boost"); | |
| break 'inner | |
| } | |
| } |
Co-authored-by: merklefruit <[email protected]>
feat(bolt-spammer): alloy migration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range comments (2)
bolt-spammer-helder/README.md (1)
Line range hint
14-17:
Clarify the instruction on fetching validators and sending pre-confirmations.The instruction should be more explicit about the process and expected outcome.
- It will fetch all the validators of the current epoch, - and try to send a pre-confirmation to the first one registered on the Bolt registry. - If no validators are found, the program will gracefully exit. Please try again in the next epoch! + The spammer will fetch all validators of the current epoch, + and attempt to send a pre-confirmation to the first validator registered on the Bolt registry. + If no validators are found, the program will gracefully exit. Please try again in the next epoch.bolt-spammer-helder/Cargo.toml (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationImpact of removing
reth-primitivesThe
reth-primitivesdependency is used extensively in the codebase, particularly in thebolt-sidecarmodule. Its removal will likely break the code and affect functionality that relies on Ethereum primitives.Files and lines with
reth-primitivesusage:
bolt-sidecar/src/test_util.rsbolt-sidecar/src/common.rsbolt-sidecar/src/primitives/constraint.rsbolt-sidecar/src/primitives/mod.rsbolt-sidecar/src/primitives/commitment.rsbolt-sidecar/src/state/execution.rsbolt-sidecar/src/builder/payload_builder.rsbolt-sidecar/src/builder/compat.rsbolt-sidecar/src/builder/template.rsA thorough review and refactoring are needed to replace or remove the
reth-primitivesdependency properly.Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-21:
Verify the impact of removingreth-primitives.Ensure that the removal of the
reth-primitivesdependency does not affect any functionality that relies on Ethereum primitives.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing `reth-primitives`. # Test: Search for any usage of `reth-primitives` in the codebase. Expect: No usage found. rg --type rust 'reth-primitives'Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are any indirect dependencies on `reth-primitives`. # Search for any mention of `reth-primitives` in the Cargo.lock file. rg 'reth-primitives' Cargo.lockLength of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are any references to Ethereum primitives in the codebase. # Search for common Ethereum primitive types or functions that might have been provided by `reth-primitives`. rg --type rust 'Address|U256|H256|H160|Block|Transaction|Receipt'Length of output: 27346
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
bolt-spammer-helder/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockbolt-spammer/Cargo.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (12)
- bolt-spammer-helder/.env.example (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer-helder/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer-helder/README.md (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer-helder/src/main.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-spammer-helder/src/utils.rs (3 hunks)
- bolt-spammer/.gitignore (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer/README.md (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer/rustfmt.toml (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer/src/constants.rs (1 hunks)
- bolt-spammer/src/main.rs (2 hunks)
- bolt-spammer/src/utils.rs (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
bolt-spammer/README.md
1-1: null
First line in a file should be a top-level heading(MD041, first-line-heading, first-line-h1)
Additional comments not posted (11)
bolt-spammer/.gitignore (1)
2-2: Good practice: Ignore.envfile.Adding the
.envfile to.gitignoreis a good practice to prevent sensitive information from being committed to version control.bolt-spammer/src/constants.rs (1)
1-4: LGTM! Constants are appropriately defined.The constants
SLOTS_PER_EPOCH,NOICE_GAS_PRICE,DEAD_ADDRESS, andKURTOSIS_CHAIN_IDare appropriately defined and follow best practices for naming and usage.bolt-spammer/rustfmt.toml (1)
1-11: LGTM! Formatting rules are appropriately defined.The formatting rules defined in
rustfmt.tomlare appropriate and follow best practices for Rust code formatting.bolt-spammer/Cargo.toml (1)
11-21: Verify the impact of removingethersand adding new dependencies.Ensure that the removal of the
ethersdependency does not affect any functionality and that the new dependencies are correctly integrated.bolt-spammer-helder/src/utils.rs (3)
Line range hint
14-22:
LGTM!The function correctly sets the gas limit and gas price for the transaction.
33-41: LGTM!The function correctly sets the gas-related parameters for the transaction.
Line range hint
53-57:
LGTM!The function correctly retrieves the current slot from the beacon API client.
bolt-spammer/src/utils.rs (3)
17-23: LGTM!The function correctly sets the gas limit and gas price for the transaction.
27-41: LGTM!The function correctly sets the gas-related parameters for the transaction.
53-57: LGTM!The function correctly retrieves the current slot from the beacon API client.
bolt-spammer-helder/src/main.rs (1)
27-36: Consider adding documentation for struct fields.Add documentation for the fields in the
Optsstruct to improve code readability and maintainability.#[derive(Parser)] struct Opts { /// EL node URL to send transactions to #[clap(short = 'p', long, default_value = "https://rpc.helder-devnets.xyz", env)] el_provider_url: Url, /// CL node URL to fetch the beacon chain info from #[clap(short = 'c', long, default_value = "http://localhost:4000", env)] beacon_client_url: Url, /// Address of the Bolt Registry smart contract #[clap(short = 'r', long, default_value = "0xdF11D829eeC4C192774F3Ec171D822f6Cb4C14d9", env)] registry_address: Address, /// Private key to sign transactions with #[clap(short = 'k', long, env)] private_key: String, // Flag for generating a blob tx instead of a regular tx #[clap(short, long, default_value = "false")] blob: bool, }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| PRIVATE_KEY=<your account private key with ETH on Helder> | ||
| BEACON_CLIENT_URL=<your beacon client HTTP endpoint> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the placeholder values for environment variables.
The placeholders for PRIVATE_KEY and BEACON_CLIENT_URL should be more descriptive to guide the user.
- PRIVATE_KEY=<your account private key with ETH on Helder>
- BEACON_CLIENT_URL=<your beacon client HTTP endpoint>
+ PRIVATE_KEY=<your Helder account private key with sufficient ETH>
+ BEACON_CLIENT_URL=<your Helder beacon client HTTP endpoint>Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| PRIVATE_KEY=<your account private key with ETH on Helder> | |
| BEACON_CLIENT_URL=<your beacon client HTTP endpoint> | |
| PRIVATE_KEY=<your Helder account private key with sufficient ETH> | |
| BEACON_CLIENT_URL=<your Helder beacon client HTTP endpoint> |
|
|
||
| # these can be used as defaults | ||
| EL_PROVIDER_URL=https://rpc.helder-devnets.xyz | ||
| REGISTRY_ADDRESS=0xdF11D829eeC4C192774F3Ec171D822f6Cb4C14d9 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Ensure the removal of variables is intentional.
The variables BEACON_CLIENT_URL, PRIVATE_KEY, and REGISTRY_ABI_PATH are still being referenced in multiple files across the codebase. Please verify if their removal from the .env.example file is intentional and does not affect the functionality.
-
BEACON_CLIENT_URLbolt-web-demo/frontend/src/lib/types.tsbolt-web-demo/frontend/src/app/page.tsxbolt-web-demo/backend/src/types.tsbolt-web-demo/backend/src/server.tsbolt-spammer-helder/README.mdbolt-spammer/README.md
-
PRIVATE_KEYtestnets/helder/README.mdbolt-web-demo/frontend/src/lib/wallet.tsbolt-contracts/script/RegisterValidators.s.solbolt-contracts/script/DeployRegistry.s.solbolt-spammer-helder/README.mdbolt-sidecar/src/builder/payload_builder.rsbolt-contracts/README.mdbolt-spammer/README.md
-
REGISTRY_ABI_PATHbolt-spammer/README.md
Analysis chain
LGTM! Ensure the removal of variables is intentional.
The changes to update the EL_PROVIDER_URL and REGISTRY_ADDRESS values, and to remove BEACON_CLIENT_URL, PRIVATE_KEY, and REGISTRY_ABI_PATH, are appropriate for the example environment configuration.
However, ensure that the removal of BEACON_CLIENT_URL, PRIVATE_KEY, and REGISTRY_ABI_PATH is intentional and does not affect the functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `BEACON_CLIENT_URL`, `PRIVATE_KEY`, and `REGISTRY_ABI_PATH` is intentional.
# Test: Search for the usage of the removed variables in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type python 'BEACON_CLIENT_URL|PRIVATE_KEY|REGISTRY_ABI_PATH'
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of `BEACON_CLIENT_URL`, `PRIVATE_KEY`, and `REGISTRY_ABI_PATH` is intentional.
# Test: Search for the usage of the removed variables in the codebase. Expect: No occurrences.
rg 'BEACON_CLIENT_URL|PRIVATE_KEY|REGISTRY_ABI_PATH'
Length of output: 2173
| provider_url: Url, | ||
| #[clap(short = 'c', long, default_value = "http://localhost:4000")] | ||
| beacon_client_url: String, | ||
| beacon_client_url: Url, | ||
| #[clap(short = 'b', long)] | ||
| bolt_sidecar_url: String, | ||
| #[clap(short = 'k', long)] | ||
| private_key: String, | ||
| #[clap(short = 'n', long)] | ||
| nonce: Option<u16>, | ||
| #[clap(short = 'B', long, default_value_t = false)] | ||
| blob: bool, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding documentation for struct fields.
Add documentation for the fields in the Opts struct to improve code readability and maintainability.
#[derive(Parser)]
struct Opts {
#[clap(short = 'p', long, default_value = "http://localhost:8545")]
provider_url: Url,
#[clap(short = 'c', long, default_value = "http://localhost:4000")]
beacon_client_url: Url,
#[clap(short = 'b', long)]
bolt_sidecar_url: String,
#[clap(short = 'k', long)]
private_key: String,
#[clap(short = 'n', long)]
nonce: Option<u16>,
#[clap(short = 'B', long, default_value_t = false)]
blob: bool,
#[clap(short = 's', long, default_value = "head")]
slot: String,
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| #[clap(short = 's', long, default_value = "head")] | ||
| slot: String, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[tokio::main] | ||
| async fn main() -> Result<()> { | ||
| tracing_subscriber::fmt::init(); | ||
| tracing::info!("starting bolt-spammer"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a log statement indicating the successful parsing of options.
Add a log statement to indicate that the options have been successfully parsed.
tracing::info!("starting bolt-spammer");
let opts = Opts::parse();
+ tracing::info!("Parsed options: {:?}", opts);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | |||
| ## A pre-confirmation spammer for the Helder testnet | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a top-level heading.
The first line should be a top-level heading as per Markdownlint.
- ## A pre-confirmation spammer for the Helder testnet
+ # A pre-confirmation spammer for the Helder testnetCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ## A pre-confirmation spammer for the Helder testnet | |
| # A pre-confirmation spammer for the Helder testnet |
Tools
Markdownlint
1-1: null
First line in a file should be a top-level heading(MD041, first-line-heading, first-line-h1)
| Then, just run the spammer with `cargo run`. It will fetch all the validators of the current epoch, | ||
| and try to send a pre-confirmation to the first one registered on the Bolt registry. | ||
| If no validators are found, the program will gracefully exit. Please try again in the next epoch! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the instruction on fetching validators and sending pre-confirmations.
The instruction should be more explicit about the process and expected outcome.
- Then, just run the spammer with `cargo run`. It will fetch all the validators of the current epoch,
- and try to send a pre-confirmation to the first one registered on the Bolt registry.
- If no validators are found, the program will gracefully exit. Please try again in the next epoch!
+ Then, just run the spammer with `cargo run`. The spammer will fetch all validators of the current epoch,
+ and attempt to send a pre-confirmation to the first validator registered on the Bolt registry.
+ If no validators are found, the program will gracefully exit. Please try again in the next epoch.Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Then, just run the spammer with `cargo run`. It will fetch all the validators of the current epoch, | |
| and try to send a pre-confirmation to the first one registered on the Bolt registry. | |
| If no validators are found, the program will gracefully exit. Please try again in the next epoch! | |
| Then, just run the spammer with `cargo run`. The spammer will fetch all validators of the current epoch, | |
| and attempt to send a pre-confirmation to the first validator registered on the Bolt registry. | |
| If no validators are found, the program will gracefully exit. Please try again in the next epoch. |
| EL_PROVIDER_URL=https://rpc.helder-devnets.xyz | ||
| BEACON_CLIENT_URL= | ||
| REGISTRY_ADDRESS=0xdF11D829eeC4C192774F3Ec171D822f6Cb4C14d9 | ||
| PRIVATE_KEY= | ||
| REGISTRY_ABI_PATH=./registry_abi.json | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the placeholder values for environment variables.
The placeholders for the environment variables should be more descriptive to guide the user.
- EL_PROVIDER_URL=https://rpc.helder-devnets.xyz
- BEACON_CLIENT_URL=
- REGISTRY_ADDRESS=0xdF11D829eeC4C192774F3Ec171D822f6Cb4C14d9
- PRIVATE_KEY=
- REGISTRY_ABI_PATH=./registry_abi.json
+ EL_PROVIDER_URL=https://rpc.helder-devnets.xyz (Helder RPC endpoint)
+ BEACON_CLIENT_URL=<your Helder beacon client HTTP endpoint>
+ REGISTRY_ADDRESS=0xdF11D829eeC4C192774F3Ec171D822f6Cb4C14d9 (Bolt registry address)
+ PRIVATE_KEY=<your Helder account private key with sufficient ETH>
+ REGISTRY_ABI_PATH=./registry_abi.json (Path to the registry ABI file)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| EL_PROVIDER_URL=https://rpc.helder-devnets.xyz | |
| BEACON_CLIENT_URL= | |
| REGISTRY_ADDRESS=0xdF11D829eeC4C192774F3Ec171D822f6Cb4C14d9 | |
| PRIVATE_KEY= | |
| REGISTRY_ABI_PATH=./registry_abi.json | |
| ``` | |
| EL_PROVIDER_URL=https://rpc.helder-devnets.xyz (Helder RPC endpoint) | |
| BEACON_CLIENT_URL=<your Helder beacon client HTTP endpoint> | |
| REGISTRY_ADDRESS=0xdF11D829eeC4C192774F3Ec171D822f6Cb4C14d9 (Bolt registry address) | |
| PRIVATE_KEY=<your Helder account private key with sufficient ETH> | |
| REGISTRY_ABI_PATH=./registry_abi.json (Path to the registry ABI file) |
| eips::eip2718::Encodable2718, | ||
| hex, | ||
| network::EthereumWallet, | ||
| network::{EthereumWallet, TransactionBuilder}, | ||
| primitives::{keccak256, Address}, | ||
| providers::{Provider, ProviderBuilder}, | ||
| signers::{local::PrivateKeySigner, Signer}, | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider organizing imports.
Organize imports to improve readability.
use alloy::{
eips::eip2718::Encodable2718,
hex,
network::{EthereumWallet, TransactionBuilder},
primitives::{keccak256, Address},
providers::{Provider, ProviderBuilder},
signers::{local::PrivateKeySigner, Signer},
};Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| @@ -42,16 +46,17 @@ | |||
| tracing_subscriber::fmt::init(); | |||
| tracing::info!("starting bolt-spammer-helder"); | |||
|
|
|||
| let path = dotenvy::dotenv()?; | |||
| tracing::info!("loaded environment variables from {:?}", path); | |||
| let _ = dotenvy::dotenv(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding a log statement indicating the successful parsing of options.
Add a log statement to indicate that the options have been successfully parsed.
tracing::info!("starting bolt-spammer-helder");
let _ = dotenvy::dotenv();
let opts = Opts::parse();
+ tracing::info!("Parsed options: {:?}", opts);Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let _ = dotenvy::dotenv(); | |
| tracing::info!("starting bolt-spammer-helder"); | |
| let _ = dotenvy::dotenv(); | |
| let opts = Opts::parse(); | |
| tracing::info!("Parsed options: {:?}", opts); |
| let tx = if opts.blob { generate_random_blob_tx() } else { generate_random_tx() }; | ||
| let mut tx = if opts.blob { generate_random_blob_tx() } else { generate_random_tx() }; | ||
| tx.set_from(sender); | ||
| tx.set_nonce(provider.get_transaction_count(sender).await?); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding error handling for transaction nonce retrieval.
Add error handling for the transaction nonce retrieval to ensure robustness.
tx.set_nonce(provider.get_transaction_count(sender).await?);
+ if let Err(e) = provider.get_transaction_count(sender).await {
+ tracing::error!("Failed to retrieve transaction nonce: {:?}", e);
+ return Err(e.into());
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| tx.set_nonce(provider.get_transaction_count(sender).await?); | |
| if let Err(e) = provider.get_transaction_count(sender).await { | |
| tracing::error!("Failed to retrieve transaction nonce: {:?}", e); | |
| return Err(e.into()); | |
| } else { | |
| tx.set_nonce(provider.get_transaction_count(sender).await?); | |
| } |
This PR refactors the block template by using the signed constraints list instead of the transactions signed. This allows a more granular control over the current state of the pre-confirmations accepted, by dropping an entire set of constraints in case some of its pre-confirmed transactions have been invalidated.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements
Bug Fixes
Chores
.envto.gitignoreto exclude sensitive information from version control.Cargo.tomlto reflect new project requirements.Documentation
README.mdto provide instructions for running the new pre-confirmation spammer.rustfmt.tomlfor consistent code formatting.