Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

M6lbr #187

Open
wants to merge 38 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

M6lbr #187

wants to merge 38 commits into from

Conversation

manuwsn
Copy link

@manuwsn manuwsn commented May 30, 2016

Hello,
I'm working on the use of several RPL instances and their connection with Internet. I plan to use several 6lbr routers with several RPL instances.
I started from the 6lbr develop branch and create my m6lbr one. To summarize, I have add an RPL instance menu allowing to add or remove RPL instance and so let the 6lbr router manage several RPL instances.
Maybe my work could be used so I propose it as a pull request.

Regards,

E. Nataf

Assistant professor
Lorraine University

@laurentderu
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the contribution !
I will however postpone the merging as this impact the nvm and this will cause backward incompatibility. The format of the NVM will soon change and will allow to have more flexibility without conflicts, and the multiple instance could benefit using that new format.

@manuwsn
Copy link
Author

manuwsn commented Jun 1, 2016

Ok,
I will follow this new format.
I record several RPL instances in the nvm file but it works with only one instance as well.
(as with no instance at all !)

Regards

----- Mail original -----

De: "Laurent Deru" [email protected]
À: "cetic/6lbr" [email protected]
Cc: "manuwsn" [email protected], "Author" [email protected]
Envoyé: Mercredi 1 Juin 2016 15:28:54
Objet: Re: [cetic/6lbr] M6lbr (#187)

Thanks for the contribution !
I will however postpone the merging as this impact the nvm and this will
cause backward incompatibility. The format of the NVM will soon change and
will allow to have more flexibility without conflicts, and the multiple
instance could benefit using that new format.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or mute the thread .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants