Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove random names from knuu #581

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mojtaba-esk
Copy link
Member

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk commented Nov 15, 2024

Closes #573

Note: we cannot delete completely random names from knuu as sometimes we need them. For example when reading a file from a docker image we need to create a random name or when kaniko wants to build an image, random names are used for jobs, pods, etc... which does not hurt the long running tests that uses static names.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a consistent naming convention for Kubernetes resources, enhancing clarity and predictability.
    • Added a defined service account name for Traefik, improving deployment logic.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the deployment process for better readability.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 15, 2024
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk requested a review from a team November 15, 2024 10:34
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk self-assigned this Nov 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in the traefik.go file focus on enhancing the deployment logic and management of Kubernetes resources. A new constant for the service account name is introduced, replacing the previous random generation method. The updates also include the use of k8s.SanitizeName for generating consistent names for ClusterRole and middleware, improving clarity and predictability. Additionally, minor adjustments to error handling enhance code readability while maintaining existing functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
pkg/traefik/traefik.go Added constant serviceAccountName, removed names.NewRandomK8(), updated role and middleware naming to use k8s.SanitizeName, and improved error handling in Deploy method.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove names.NewRandomK8() completely from project (573)

🐰 In the land where the code does play,
A service account now leads the way.
No more randomness in names to find,
With clarity and order, we’re one of a kind!
Kubernetes sings a joyful tune,
As Traefik dances beneath the moon! 🌙


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pkg/traefik/traefik.go (2)

295-295: LGTM: Consistent ingress route naming pattern

Good use of k8s.SanitizeName with a clear suffix. Consider standardizing the suffix format across the codebase (e.g., either use "ing-route" or "ingress-route" consistently).


Line range hint 1-365: Excellent implementation of deterministic naming strategy

The changes successfully replace random name generation with a consistent and predictable naming scheme. This improves test reliability while maintaining uniqueness through:

  1. Static constants for fixed names
  2. Namespace-prefixed names for cluster-scoped resources
  3. Sanitized, purpose-indicating suffixes for dynamic resources

Consider documenting the naming conventions in a central location to ensure consistency as the codebase grows.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23bffd9 and 6ee0d8a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/traefik/traefik.go (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pkg/traefik/traefik.go (4)

28-28: LGTM: Good replacement of random name with static constant

The introduction of a static service account name constant aligns well with the PR objective of removing random names, improving test predictability.


204-204: LGTM: Clear and predictable middleware naming

Good use of k8s.SanitizeName with a descriptive suffix that indicates the middleware's purpose.


Line range hint 327-331: LGTM: Appropriate error handling

The error handling properly wraps and propagates any creation failures.


58-61: LGTM: Good use of sanitized naming for cluster role

The combination of namespace and static role name with sanitization ensures both uniqueness and consistency. This is a good replacement for random naming.

Let's verify the cluster role naming pattern across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Let me verify the cluster role naming pattern by checking the actual implementation and test cases.


Let me check the actual implementation of SanitizeName to verify its behavior.


LGTM: Verified consistent and safe cluster role naming pattern

The implementation is verified to be robust and consistent across the codebase:

  • SanitizeName properly handles DNS-1123 compliance by converting to lowercase, replacing invalid chars with hyphens, and enforcing length limits
  • The namespace-based naming pattern is used exclusively for cluster roles, with no instances of random naming
  • Test cases confirm proper sanitization behavior for various edge cases
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other potential random name generations in cluster role creation
rg -g '*.go' 'CreateClusterRole|NewRandomK8.*Role'

Length of output: 1132


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the test cases for cluster role naming patterns
rg -g '*_test.go' -B 2 -A 5 'TestCreateClusterRole.*\{|TestCreateClusterRoleBinding.*\{'

# Check for any other SanitizeName usages
rg -g '*.go' 'SanitizeName'

Length of output: 1813


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the SanitizeName implementation and its test cases
cat pkg/k8s/utils.go | grep -A 15 "func SanitizeName"
cat pkg/k8s/utils_test.go | grep -A 30 "func TestSanitizeName"

Length of output: 1345

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

remove names.NewRandomK8() completely from the project
2 participants