Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: refactor basic tests to use the new knuu obj #548

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

mojtaba-esk
Copy link
Member

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk commented Aug 22, 2024

Closes #386

Please note that the system tests are filing due to a series of issues that are resolved in #535 the focus of this PR is to refactor basic tests and remove the old knuu code which was for backward compatibility

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Refactored the test suite structure for better organization and readability.
    • Introduced context management for improved handling of long-running operations.
    • Added constants for standardized resource management across tests.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling with clearer assertions and failure messages.
  • Refactor

    • Transitioned from standalone test functions to methods associated with a suite.
    • Streamlined test setup, execution, and cleanup processes, improving overall maintainability.
    • Improved naming conventions for clarity in test logic.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk added this to the v0.15.0 milestone Aug 22, 2024
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk requested a review from a team August 22, 2024 07:42
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk self-assigned this Aug 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve refactoring end-to-end tests in the basic package to utilize a Knuu object, enhancing the structure and clarity of the test code. Test functions have been transformed into methods on a suite struct, improving organization, resource management, and error handling throughout the test lifecycle. Additionally, several constants have been introduced, and the overall test setup and teardown processes have been streamlined.

Changes

Files Change Summary
e2e/basic/basic_test.go Refactored TestBasic function to use suite struct; improved test setup with dynamic instance naming; simplified cleanup and assertions.
e2e/basic/observability_test.go Transitioned TestObservabilityCollector to suite method; improved context handling and error reporting; updated Prometheus setup.
e2e/basic/probe_test.go Refactored TestProbe to use suite structure; enhanced clarity in setup; improved error handling and configurability.
e2e/basic/rbac_test.go Modified TestRBAC to use suite struct; streamlined setup with context; improved error handling and test logic clarity.
e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go Transitioned test functions to suite methods; improved error handling and context management; renamed variables for clarity.
e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go Renamed TestSuite to Suite; added fields for resource management; introduced SetupTest and TearDownTest methods.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant TestSuite
    participant Knuu
    participant Executor

    User->>TestSuite: Initiate Test
    TestSuite->>Knuu: Setup Instance
    Knuu->>Executor: Create New Instance
    Executor-->>Knuu: Instance Created
    Knuu-->>TestSuite: Instance Ready
    TestSuite->>User: Test Execution Complete
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor e2e tests to use knuu object. (386)

🐰 In the land of code, we hop with glee,
Refactoring tests, as clever as can be!
With Knuu by our side, we streamline and cheer,
In a structured suite, our paths are now clear!
So let’s dance through the functions, both neat and bright,
For every little test now shines with delight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2024 07:13
tty47
tty47 previously approved these changes Aug 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@tty47 tty47 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you so much! 🪨

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between edf5f29 and f27e223.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • e2e/basic/basic_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/basic/observability_test.go (4 hunks)
  • e2e/basic/probe_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/basic/rbac_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go (3 hunks)
  • e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (18)
e2e/basic/basic_test.go (3)

12-13: Ensure proper error handling for instance creation.

The instance creation uses s.Knuu.NewInstance, and error handling is done using s.Require().NoError. This is a good practice to ensure the test fails immediately if an error occurs.


21-26: Use direct equality assertion for output verification.

The test logic directly asserts the equality of the expected and actual output. This change improves clarity by focusing on verifying the exact output.


8-8: Refactor to use Suite struct for tests.

The function signature has been updated from TestSuite to Suite, indicating a shift to a more structured testing approach. Ensure that the Suite struct is correctly defined and initialized elsewhere in the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the definition of the Suite struct:

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Suite Struct is Properly Defined

The Suite struct is defined in e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go and includes necessary fields for test management, confirming that the refactor to use the Suite struct in e2e/basic/basic_test.go is correctly implemented. No issues found with the struct definition.

  • e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go: Contains the Suite struct definition with fields for synchronization and test state management.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition of the `Suite` struct.

# Test: Search for the `Suite` struct definition. Expect: A valid struct definition.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Suite struct {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 961

e2e/basic/rbac_test.go (3)

18-19: Ensure proper error handling for instance creation.

The instance creation uses s.Knuu.NewInstance, and error handling is done using s.Require().NoError. This is a good practice to ensure the test fails immediately if an error occurs.


38-42: Trim whitespace before comparing exit codes.

Trimming whitespace before comparing the exit code ensures robustness against formatting issues. This is a good practice to prevent false negatives in tests.


14-15: Refactor to use Suite struct for tests.

The function signature has been updated from a standalone function to a method on the Suite struct, indicating a shift to a more structured testing approach. Ensure that the Suite struct is correctly defined and initialized elsewhere in the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the definition of the Suite struct:

Verification successful

Verified: The Suite struct is correctly defined and used.

The Suite struct is defined in multiple files, indicating a structured approach to testing. The refactoring aligns with the existing pattern in the codebase.

  • e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go
  • e2e/netshaper/suite_setup_test.go
  • e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition of the `Suite` struct.

# Test: Search for the `Suite` struct definition. Expect: A valid struct definition.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Suite struct {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 961

e2e/basic/probe_test.go (3)

16-17: Ensure proper error handling for instance creation.

The instance creation uses s.Executor.NewInstance, and error handling is done using s.Require().NoError. This is a good practice to ensure the test fails immediately if an error occurs.


45-46: Use Contains assertion for output verification.

The test logic uses s.Assert().Contains to verify that the output contains the expected substring. This is a good practice for verifying partial matches in output.


11-12: Refactor to use Suite struct for tests.

The function signature has been updated from a standalone function to a method on the Suite struct, indicating a shift to a more structured testing approach. Ensure that the Suite struct is correctly defined and initialized elsewhere in the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the definition of the Suite struct:

Verification successful

Suite Struct is Correctly Defined

The Suite struct is defined and initialized in multiple files, ensuring a structured approach to testing as intended by the refactoring. The struct includes the necessary fields and is embedded with suite.Suite, aligning with the refactoring goals.

  • e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go
  • e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go
  • e2e/netshaper/suite_setup_test.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the definition of the `Suite` struct.

# Test: Search for the `Suite` struct definition. Expect: A valid struct definition.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Suite struct {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 961

e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go (2)

17-44: Refactor to Suite Structure: Approved

The refactoring to use a suite structure enhances the organization and error handling of the test. The use of context and suite methods for assertions is a best practice.

Ensure that the context is correctly managed throughout the test lifecycle.


Line range hint 46-85: Refactor to Suite Structure: Approved

The refactoring to use a suite structure improves the clarity and maintainability of the test. The use of context and suite methods for assertions is appropriate.

Ensure that the context is correctly managed throughout the test lifecycle.

e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go (6)

21-43: Enhancements to Suite Struct: Approved

The introduction of new fields and constants in the Suite struct improves resource management and test execution flow. The use of atomic counters and a mutex for synchronization is appropriate.

Ensure that the synchronization logic is correctly implemented to avoid race conditions.


53-76: Enhanced SetupSuite Method: Approved

The SetupSuite method improvements enhance the test environment setup with better configuration and resource management.

Ensure that the initialization process is correctly handled and that all dependencies are properly configured.


79-82: SetupTest Method for Parallel Execution: Approved

The SetupTest method supports parallel test execution, improving the test execution flow.

Ensure that the tests are correctly isolated to prevent interference during parallel execution.


85-95: TearDownTest Method for Resource Cleanup: Approved

The TearDownTest method ensures proper cleanup after each test, enhancing resource management.

Ensure that the cleanup logic is correctly implemented to avoid resource leaks.


97-103: Encapsulated Cleanup Logic: Approved

The cleanupSuite method encapsulates the cleanup logic, improving modularity and readability.

Ensure that the cleanup process is correctly executed to prevent resource leaks.


105-111: Nginx Instance Creation: Approved

The createNginxInstance method provides a clear and consistent way to create Nginx instances for tests.

Ensure that the instance creation process is correctly handled and that all configurations are properly applied.

e2e/basic/observability_test.go (1)

Line range hint 24-98: Refactor to Suite Structure: Approved

The refactoring to use a suite structure improves the organization, readability, and error handling of the test. The use of context and suite methods for assertions is appropriate.

Ensure that the context is correctly managed and that the configuration process for Prometheus and the target pod is properly handled.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk requested a review from tty47 August 23, 2024 08:14
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk merged commit 96ba8ca into main Aug 27, 2024
7 of 10 checks passed
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk deleted the mojtaba/386-refactor-e2e-tests-to-use-knuu-object branch August 27, 2024 06:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor e2e tests to use knuu object.
3 participants