-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: refactor basic tests to use the new knuu obj #548
chore: refactor basic tests to use the new knuu obj #548
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes involve refactoring end-to-end tests in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TestSuite
participant Knuu
participant Executor
User->>TestSuite: Initiate Test
TestSuite->>Knuu: Setup Instance
Knuu->>Executor: Create New Instance
Executor-->>Knuu: Instance Created
Knuu-->>TestSuite: Instance Ready
TestSuite->>User: Test Execution Complete
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thank you so much! 🪨
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- e2e/basic/basic_test.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/basic/observability_test.go (4 hunks)
- e2e/basic/probe_test.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/basic/rbac_test.go (1 hunks)
- e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go (3 hunks)
- e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (18)
e2e/basic/basic_test.go (3)
12-13
: Ensure proper error handling for instance creation.The instance creation uses
s.Knuu.NewInstance
, and error handling is done usings.Require().NoError
. This is a good practice to ensure the test fails immediately if an error occurs.
21-26
: Use direct equality assertion for output verification.The test logic directly asserts the equality of the expected and actual output. This change improves clarity by focusing on verifying the exact output.
8-8
: Refactor to useSuite
struct for tests.The function signature has been updated from
TestSuite
toSuite
, indicating a shift to a more structured testing approach. Ensure that theSuite
struct is correctly defined and initialized elsewhere in the codebase.Run the following script to verify the definition of the
Suite
struct:Verification successful
Verification Successful:
Suite
Struct is Properly DefinedThe
Suite
struct is defined ine2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go
and includes necessary fields for test management, confirming that the refactor to use theSuite
struct ine2e/basic/basic_test.go
is correctly implemented. No issues found with the struct definition.
e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go
: Contains theSuite
struct definition with fields for synchronization and test state management.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the `Suite` struct. # Test: Search for the `Suite` struct definition. Expect: A valid struct definition. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Suite struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 961
e2e/basic/rbac_test.go (3)
18-19
: Ensure proper error handling for instance creation.The instance creation uses
s.Knuu.NewInstance
, and error handling is done usings.Require().NoError
. This is a good practice to ensure the test fails immediately if an error occurs.
38-42
: Trim whitespace before comparing exit codes.Trimming whitespace before comparing the exit code ensures robustness against formatting issues. This is a good practice to prevent false negatives in tests.
14-15
: Refactor to useSuite
struct for tests.The function signature has been updated from a standalone function to a method on the
Suite
struct, indicating a shift to a more structured testing approach. Ensure that theSuite
struct is correctly defined and initialized elsewhere in the codebase.Run the following script to verify the definition of the
Suite
struct:Verification successful
Verified: The
Suite
struct is correctly defined and used.The
Suite
struct is defined in multiple files, indicating a structured approach to testing. The refactoring aligns with the existing pattern in the codebase.
e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go
e2e/netshaper/suite_setup_test.go
e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the `Suite` struct. # Test: Search for the `Suite` struct definition. Expect: A valid struct definition. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Suite struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 961
e2e/basic/probe_test.go (3)
16-17
: Ensure proper error handling for instance creation.The instance creation uses
s.Executor.NewInstance
, and error handling is done usings.Require().NoError
. This is a good practice to ensure the test fails immediately if an error occurs.
45-46
: UseContains
assertion for output verification.The test logic uses
s.Assert().Contains
to verify that the output contains the expected substring. This is a good practice for verifying partial matches in output.
11-12
: Refactor to useSuite
struct for tests.The function signature has been updated from a standalone function to a method on the
Suite
struct, indicating a shift to a more structured testing approach. Ensure that theSuite
struct is correctly defined and initialized elsewhere in the codebase.Run the following script to verify the definition of the
Suite
struct:Verification successful
Suite Struct is Correctly Defined
The
Suite
struct is defined and initialized in multiple files, ensuring a structured approach to testing as intended by the refactoring. The struct includes the necessary fields and is embedded withsuite.Suite
, aligning with the refactoring goals.
e2e/system/suite_setup_test.go
e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go
e2e/netshaper/suite_setup_test.go
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of the `Suite` struct. # Test: Search for the `Suite` struct definition. Expect: A valid struct definition. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'type Suite struct { $$$ }'Length of output: 961
e2e/basic/reverse_proxy_test.go (2)
17-44
: Refactor to Suite Structure: ApprovedThe refactoring to use a suite structure enhances the organization and error handling of the test. The use of context and suite methods for assertions is a best practice.
Ensure that the context is correctly managed throughout the test lifecycle.
Line range hint
46-85
: Refactor to Suite Structure: ApprovedThe refactoring to use a suite structure improves the clarity and maintainability of the test. The use of context and suite methods for assertions is appropriate.
Ensure that the context is correctly managed throughout the test lifecycle.
e2e/basic/suite_setup_test.go (6)
21-43
: Enhancements to Suite Struct: ApprovedThe introduction of new fields and constants in the
Suite
struct improves resource management and test execution flow. The use of atomic counters and a mutex for synchronization is appropriate.Ensure that the synchronization logic is correctly implemented to avoid race conditions.
53-76
: Enhanced SetupSuite Method: ApprovedThe
SetupSuite
method improvements enhance the test environment setup with better configuration and resource management.Ensure that the initialization process is correctly handled and that all dependencies are properly configured.
79-82
: SetupTest Method for Parallel Execution: ApprovedThe
SetupTest
method supports parallel test execution, improving the test execution flow.Ensure that the tests are correctly isolated to prevent interference during parallel execution.
85-95
: TearDownTest Method for Resource Cleanup: ApprovedThe
TearDownTest
method ensures proper cleanup after each test, enhancing resource management.Ensure that the cleanup logic is correctly implemented to avoid resource leaks.
97-103
: Encapsulated Cleanup Logic: ApprovedThe
cleanupSuite
method encapsulates the cleanup logic, improving modularity and readability.Ensure that the cleanup process is correctly executed to prevent resource leaks.
105-111
: Nginx Instance Creation: ApprovedThe
createNginxInstance
method provides a clear and consistent way to create Nginx instances for tests.Ensure that the instance creation process is correctly handled and that all configurations are properly applied.
e2e/basic/observability_test.go (1)
Line range hint
24-98
: Refactor to Suite Structure: ApprovedThe refactoring to use a suite structure improves the organization, readability, and error handling of the test. The use of context and suite methods for assertions is appropriate.
Ensure that the context is correctly managed and that the configuration process for Prometheus and the target pod is properly handled.
Closes #386
Please note that the system tests are filing due to a series of issues that are resolved in #535 the focus of this PR is to refactor basic tests and remove the old knuu code which was for backward compatibility
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor