Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: refactor knuu object to use options as argument #436

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

mojtaba-esk
Copy link
Member

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk commented Jun 10, 2024

This PR proposes a change to use options as an argument in the new function instead of using WithFuncs.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Improved code readability and maintainability by centralizing configuration options into a single Options struct.
    • Replaced individual option functions with a unified Options struct for easier management.
  • Tests

    • Updated test cases to use the new Options struct instead of individual options, ensuring consistency and simplifying test setup.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk requested a review from a team June 10, 2024 15:04
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 10, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@mojtaba-esk has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 48 minutes and 8 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83fb824 and 005067e.

Walkthrough

The changes involve refactoring the Knuu struct and its initialization process to use a consolidated Options struct instead of individual Option functions. This improves readability and maintainability by centralizing configuration options and separating specific functionalities into dedicated functions. The updates affect various test files and the main implementation files, ensuring consistent usage of the new Options struct across the codebase.

Changes

Files Change Summary
e2e/bittwister/suite_setup_test.go Updated SetupSuite to use knuu.Options{ProxyEnabled: true} instead of knuu.WithProxyEnabled().
e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go Modified TestBuildFromGit to initialize kn with knuu.Options{}.
pkg/knuu/knuu.go Refactored Knuu struct and New function to use Options struct, added setDefaults, setupProxy, loadEnvVariables functions.
pkg/knuu/knuu_old.go Updated InitializeWithScope to pass options as a struct Options.
pkg/knuu/knuu_test.go Replaced options slice with Options struct in test cases.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant TestSuite
    participant Knuu

    User->>TestSuite: Initialize Test
    TestSuite->>Knuu: New(ctx, Options{...})
    Knuu->>Knuu: setDefaults()
    Knuu->>Knuu: setupProxy()
    Knuu-->>TestSuite: Return Knuu instance
    TestSuite-->>User: Test initialized
Loading

Possibly related issues

  • Knuu Options Struct #410: The refactor to use an Options struct addresses the issue of simplifying the initialization process and reducing the need for multiple With* functions.

Poem

In the code where options roam,
A refactor brings them home.
No more scattered, all in one,
Easier now, the work is done.
With Options set, the path is clear,
For Knuu to shine, year after year. 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b65065 and 83fb824.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • e2e/bittwister/suite_setup_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/knuu/knuu.go (2 hunks)
  • pkg/knuu/knuu_old.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/knuu/knuu_test.go (7 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
  • pkg/knuu/knuu.go (Error: Server error. Please try again later.)
Additional comments not posted (4)
e2e/bittwister/suite_setup_test.go (1)

23-23: The refactoring to use Options struct for initialization is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR objectives.

e2e/system/build_from_git_test.go (1)

21-21: Initialization of knuu with an empty Options struct is implemented correctly. Ensure that default values are properly handled in the Options struct or during initialization.

Verification successful

Let's correct the regex error and re-run the script to gather the necessary information about the Options struct and the New function.


Let's extract the definitions of the Options struct and the New function to inspect how default values are handled.


Let's extract the definition of the setDefaults function to verify how default values are handled.


The setDefaults function ensures that critical fields in the Options struct have default values if they are not provided. However, some fields like ImageBuilder and Minio are not explicitly set in setDefaults and rely on being set externally.

  • Logger: Default is set if nil.
  • TestScope: Default is set if empty.
  • timeout: Default is set if zero.
  • K8sCli: Default is set if nil.

Fields like ImageBuilder and Minio should be verified to ensure they are set appropriately in the context where knuu.New is called.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that default values are correctly set in the Options struct or during initialization.

# Test: Search for the Options struct definition and initialization logic.
rg --type go $'type Options struct' 'pkg/knuu/knuu.go'
rg --type go $'func New(' 'pkg/knuu/knuu.go'

Length of output: 188



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that default values are correctly set in the Options struct or during initialization.

# Test: Search for the Options struct definition and initialization logic.
rg --type go 'type Options struct' pkg/knuu/knuu.go
rg --type go 'func New\(' pkg/knuu/knuu.go

Length of output: 181



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the definition of the Options struct
rg --type go --context 10 'type Options struct' pkg/knuu/knuu.go

# Extract the definition of the New function
rg --type go --context 20 'func New\(' pkg/knuu/knuu.go

Length of output: 1436



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the definition of the setDefaults function
rg --type go --context 20 'func setDefaults' pkg/knuu/knuu.go

Length of output: 962

pkg/knuu/knuu_test.go (1)

Line range hint 63-127: All test cases have been updated to use the new Options struct correctly. This change enhances the readability and maintainability of the test code.

pkg/knuu/knuu_old.go (1)

72-76: The update to use the Options struct in the deprecated InitializeWithScope function is correctly implemented. This maintains backward compatibility while aligning with the new design.

pkg/knuu/knuu.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
MSevey
MSevey previously approved these changes Jun 10, 2024
Copy link
Member

@MSevey MSevey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor comment on the env loading. Fine to do as a follow up though.

Also let's reference the issue this is closing to make sure it closes it on merge.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk requested a review from MSevey June 12, 2024 10:51
Copy link
Contributor

@tty47 tty47 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@sysrex sysrex left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

sysrex

This comment was marked as duplicate.

Copy link
Member

@MSevey MSevey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Closes #410

@mojtaba-esk
Copy link
Member Author

Closes #410

Thanks for finding it. I did not.

@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk merged commit df4999f into main Jun 13, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@mojtaba-esk mojtaba-esk deleted the mojtaba/refactor-knuu-obj-options branch June 13, 2024 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants