chore: unittest for k8s pkg #416
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
WalkthroughThe changes introduce comprehensive unit tests for various Kubernetes resources in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pkg/k8s/k8s.go (1)
Line range hint
38-38: Several issues have been identified by static analysis in theNewfunction:
- Undefined variables and types such as
KubeManager,getClusterConfig,ErrRetrievingKubernetesConfig, etc.- Missing method implementations for
NamespaceExistsandCreateNamespace.These need to be addressed to ensure the function can compile and function as intended.
Also applies to: 41-41, 43-43, 48-48, 54-54, 60-60, 64-64, 66-66, 71-71, 72-72
pkg/k8s/k8s_pod_test.go (2)
206-222: The explanation for not implementingTestRunCommandInPoddue to its complexity and dependency on real Kubernetes behavior is reasonable. However, documenting this decision within the codebase, perhaps in a README or developer documentation, would be beneficial for future reference.
332-350: The decision to not implementTestPortForwardPoddue to protocol complexity is understandable. As withTestRunCommandInPod, consider documenting these decisions more formally to aid in future test planning and development.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (21)
- pkg/k8s/k8s.go (4 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_deployment_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pod_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pvc_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_role_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_rolebinding_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_service.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_service_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_serviceaccount_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/suite_setup_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/types.go (3 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/utils.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/knuu_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
pkg/k8s/k8s.go
38-38: undefined: KubeManager (typecheck)
41-41: undefined: getClusterConfig (typecheck)
43-43: undefined: ErrRetrievingKubernetesConfig (typecheck)
48-48: undefined: ErrCreatingClientset (typecheck)
54-54: undefined: ErrCreatingDiscoveryClient (typecheck)
60-60: undefined: ErrCreatingDynamicClient (typecheck)
64-64: undefined: SanitizeName (typecheck)
66-66: kc.NamespaceExists undefined (type *Client has no field or method NamespaceExists) (typecheck)
71-71: kc.CreateNamespace undefined (type *Client has no field or method CreateNamespace) (typecheck)
72-72: undefined: ErrCreatingNamespace (typecheck)
Additional comments not posted (61)
pkg/k8s/suite_setup_test.go (4)
16-20: TheTestSuitestruct is well-defined and appropriately sets up the fields necessary for the tests.
22-29: TheSetupTestmethod is correctly setting up the test environment by initializing the necessary clients and setting the namespace.
31-32: TheTearDownTestmethod is currently empty, which is acceptable if no specific teardown actions are required.
34-36: TheTestKubeManagerTestSuitefunction correctly initializes and runs theTestSuite.pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource.go (2)
33-33: TheCreateCustomResourcefunction correctly uses the provided context to create a custom resource and handles errors appropriately.
33-33: TheCustomResourceDefinitionExistsfunction correctly checks for the existence of a custom resource definition by querying the server resources.pkg/k8s/utils.go (4)
14-16: TheisClusterEnvironmentfunction correctly checks for the presence of specific files to determine if the program is running in a Kubernetes cluster.
18-20: ThefileExistsfunction is implemented correctly to check for the existence of a file at a specified path.
23-32: ThegetClusterConfigfunction correctly determines and returns the appropriate Kubernetes cluster configuration based on the environment.
37-57: TheSanitizeNamefunction is well-implemented to ensure that strings comply with Kubernetes DNS-1123 subdomain specifications. It handles various cases such as converting to lowercase, replacing invalid characters, and trimming appropriately.pkg/k8s/utils_test.go (1)
10-88: TheTestSanitizeNamefunction is comprehensive and well-structured, covering a wide range of scenarios to ensure theSanitizeNamefunction behaves as expected.pkg/k8s/k8s.go (4)
32-33: TheClientstruct is appropriately updated to use interfaces (kubernetes.Interfaceanddiscovery.DiscoveryInterface), enhancing flexibility and testability.
78-90: TheNewCustomfunction is a valuable addition, allowing for the creation of a custom client with specified interfaces and namespace, which can be particularly useful for testing and custom configurations.
92-92: TheClientsetmethod is correctly updated to returnkubernetes.Interfaceinstead of a concrete type, aligning with best practices for better abstraction and flexibility.
104-105: The addition of theDiscoveryClientmethod is a logical extension of the changes made to theClientstruct, providing a method to access the discovery client directly.pkg/k8s/k8s_deployment_test.go (1)
17-94: Well-structured unit tests for deployment readiness and error handling.pkg/knuu/knuu_test.go (1)
29-29: Correct implementation of theClientsetmethod in the mock structure.pkg/k8s/k8s_pvc_test.go (2)
18-63: Comprehensive tests for PersistentVolumeClaim creation and error handling.
65-134: Effective testing of PersistentVolumeClaim deletion scenarios, including error handling.pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource_test.go (2)
18-77: Comprehensive tests for custom resource creation, including error handling.
79-150: Effective testing of custom resource definition existence checks, including error handling.pkg/k8s/types.go (1)
Line range hint
12-48: Well-defined interface for managing Kubernetes resources, covering a broad range of functionalities.pkg/k8s/k8s_service.go (1)
152-181: Effective implementation of service readiness and connectivity checks with appropriate error handling.pkg/k8s/k8s_role_test.go (4)
16-73: The implementation ofTestCreateRolefollows best practices for unit testing with appropriate use of table-driven tests and mock setups. Good job ensuring comprehensive test coverage for different scenarios.
75-118: TheTestDeleteRolefunction is well-implemented, using a consistent testing pattern and effective use of mocks to simulate various outcomes. This ensures robust testing of the role deletion functionality.
[APROVED]
120-180:TestCreateClusterRoleis correctly structured to test various scenarios including error handling. The use of table-driven tests and mocks is consistent with best practices.
182-224: TheTestDeleteClusterRolefunction is well-implemented with a clear structure and effective use of mocks to simulate different outcomes, ensuring comprehensive testing of the cluster role deletion process.pkg/k8s/k8s_rolebinding_test.go (4)
16-64: The implementation ofTestCreateRoleBindingfollows best practices for unit testing with appropriate use of table-driven tests and mock setups. Good job ensuring comprehensive test coverage for different scenarios.
66-109: TheTestDeleteRoleBindingfunction is well-implemented, using a consistent testing pattern and effective use of mocks to simulate various outcomes. This ensures robust testing of the role binding deletion functionality.
111-172:TestCreateClusterRoleBindingis correctly structured to test various scenarios including error handling. The use of table-driven tests and mocks is consistent with best practices.
174-217: TheTestDeleteClusterRoleBindingfunction is well-implemented with a clear structure and effective use of mocks to simulate different outcomes, ensuring comprehensive testing of the cluster role binding deletion process.pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go (4)
17-68: The implementation ofTestCreateNamespacefollows best practices for unit testing with appropriate use of table-driven tests and mock setups. Good job ensuring comprehensive test coverage for different scenarios.
70-120: TheTestDeleteNamespacefunction is well-implemented, using a consistent testing pattern and effective use of mocks to simulate various outcomes. This ensures robust testing of the namespace deletion functionality.
122-185:TestGetNamespaceis correctly structured to test various scenarios including error handling. The use of table-driven tests and mocks is consistent with best practices.
187-229: TheTestNamespaceExistsfunction is well-implemented with a clear structure and effective use of mocks to simulate different outcomes, ensuring comprehensive testing of the namespace existence check process.pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go (4)
17-62: The implementation ofTestCreateNetworkPolicyfollows best practices for unit testing with appropriate use of table-driven tests and mock setups. Good job ensuring comprehensive test coverage for different scenarios.
64-114: TheTestDeleteNetworkPolicyfunction is well-implemented, using a consistent testing pattern and effective use of mocks to simulate various outcomes. This ensures robust testing of the network policy deletion functionality.
116-180:TestGetNetworkPolicyis correctly structured to test various scenarios including error handling. The use of table-driven tests and mocks is consistent with best practices.
182-224: TheTestNetworkPolicyExistsfunction is well-implemented with a clear structure and effective use of mocks to simulate different outcomes, ensuring comprehensive testing of the network policy existence check process.pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (4)
17-79: The implementation ofTestGetConfigMapfollows best practices for unit testing with appropriate use of table-driven tests and mock setups. Good job ensuring comprehensive test coverage for different scenarios.
81-135: TheTestConfigMapExistsfunction is well-implemented, using a consistent testing pattern and effective use of mocks to simulate various outcomes. This ensures robust testing of the ConfigMap existence check functionality.
137-204:TestCreateConfigMapis correctly structured to test various scenarios including error handling. The use of table-driven tests and mocks is consistent with best practices.
206-261: TheTestDeleteConfigMapfunction is well-implemented with a clear structure and effective use of mocks to simulate different outcomes, ensuring comprehensive testing of the ConfigMap deletion process.pkg/k8s/k8s_pod_test.go (3)
70-126: The test functionTestReplacePodeffectively handles both successful and error scenarios. The use ofPrependReactorto simulate Kubernetes API behavior is a good practice. Ensure that the error messages and conditions simulated in the tests align with those that can occur in the production environment.
224-277: The functionTestDeletePodWithGracePeriodhandles various scenarios including successful deletion and errors. The use ofPrependReactorto simulate different behaviors is effective. Ensure that the test cases cover all possible error conditions that might be encountered in a real environment.
128-204: The functionTestIsPodRunningchecks the pod's running status based on theReadyfield in the pod's status. This is a critical piece of functionality, and the tests appear to cover the necessary scenarios. However, consider adding a test case for when the Kubernetes API returns a partial or unexpected response.pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go (3)
343-392: Enhance readability ofTestDeleteDaemonSet.The
TestDeleteDaemonSetfunction is well-structured and follows good testing practices. However, consider adding more inline comments to explain the purpose of each test case, which would enhance readability and maintainability.
225-341: OptimizeTestUpdateDaemonSetby using table-driven tests.The structure of
TestUpdateDaemonSetcould be optimized by using table-driven tests, which would make the tests easier to extend and maintain. Consider restructuring the tests to align with this pattern.- for _, tt := range tests { + for _, test := range tests { + t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) { + // test logic here + }) + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
134-223: Review error handling strategy inTestCreateDaemonSet.The error handling in
TestCreateDaemonSetrelies on custom error messages that might not be consistent with the actual Kubernetes API errors. Verify that the error messages align with those from the Kubernetes API to avoid confusion and improve test reliability.pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset_test.go (4)
227-307: Enhance readability ofTestIsReplicaSetRunning.The
TestIsReplicaSetRunningfunction is well-structured and follows good testing practices. However, consider adding more inline comments to explain the purpose of each test case, which would enhance readability and maintainability.
157-225: OptimizeTestReplaceReplicaSetby using table-driven tests.The structure of
TestReplaceReplicaSetcould be optimized by using table-driven tests, which would make the tests easier to extend and maintain. Consider restructuring the tests to align with this pattern.- for _, tt := range tests { + for _, test := range tests { + t.Run(test.name, function(t *testing.T) { + // test logic here + }) + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
381-446: OptimizeTestDeleteReplicaSetby using table-driven tests.The structure of
TestDeleteReplicaSetcould be optimized by using table-driven tests, which would make the tests easier to extend and maintain. Consider restructuring the tests to align with this pattern.- for _, tt := range tests { + for _, test := range tests { + t.Run(test.name, function(t *testing.T) { + // test logic here + }) + }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
309-379: Review error handling strategy inTestDeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod.The error handling in
TestDeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriodrelies on custom error messages that might not be consistent with the actual Kubernetes API errors. Verify that the error messages align with those from the Kubernetes API to avoid confusion and improve test reliability.Verification successful
The error handling in
TestDeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriodaligns with the error handling strategy in theDeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriodfunction. The function uses predefined errors such asErrCheckingReplicaSetExistsandErrDeletingReplicaSet, which are consistent with the error messages used in the test cases.
pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset.go:97:return ErrCheckingReplicaSetExists.WithParams(name).Wrap(err)pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset.go:107:return ErrDeletingReplicaSet.WithParams(name).Wrap(err)These predefined errors ensure consistency and clarity in error handling.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check Kubernetes API documentation for error messages related to ReplicaSet operations. # Expected: Error messages in tests should match those documented in the Kubernetes API. # Command to open Kubernetes API documentation in a browser (example) xdg-open https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/generated/kubernetes-api/v1.21/#replicaset-v1-appsLength of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for error messages related to ReplicaSet operations in the codebase rg 'errors.New' --glob '**/*.go' | grep -i 'replicaset'Length of output: 2631
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod function implementation to inspect its error handling ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod($_, $_, $_) $_'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod function implementation to inspect its error handling rg 'func DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod' --glob '**/*.go'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all function definitions in the codebase to locate the DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod function ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func $_($_, $_, $_) $_'Length of output: 9582
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod function implementation to inspect its error handling rg 'DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod' --glob '**/*.go'Length of output: 850
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod function implementation from pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset.go ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (c *Client) DeleteReplicaSetWithGracePeriod(ctx context.Context, name string, gracePeriodSeconds *int64) error' pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset.goLength of output: 1240
pkg/k8s/k8s_service_test.go (8)
19-68: Comprehensive testing forGetServicefunction.The test cases cover both successful retrieval and client errors effectively. The use of table-driven tests enhances maintainability and readability.
70-122: Comprehensive testing forCreateServicefunction.The test cases are well-structured and cover scenarios including successful creation and client errors. The use of mocks and assertions is appropriate and follows best practices.
124-179: Comprehensive testing forPatchServicefunction.The test setup and execution for patching services are correctly implemented. The scenarios for both successful and error conditions are well-handled.
181-226: Comprehensive testing forDeleteServicefunction.The tests for service deletion handle both successful and error scenarios effectively. The structure and clarity of the tests are commendable.
228-283: Comprehensive testing forGetServiceIPfunction.The test cases are well-designed to cover the retrieval of service IP under normal and error conditions. The mock setup and assertions are correctly used.
285-445: Enhanced error handling inWaitForServicetests.The addition of context handling and parallel test execution in
WaitForServicetests is a significant improvement. It ensures that the tests are robust and can handle real-world scenarios more effectively.
447-510: Comprehensive testing forGetServiceEndpointfunction.The tests for retrieving the service endpoint are thorough, covering both successful cases and handling client errors. The use of structured tests ensures easy maintenance and clarity.
512-537: Utility functioncreateServiceandstartDummyServerare well-implemented.These utility functions are essential for setting up the test environment and are implemented with clear error handling and resource management.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_deployment_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pod_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pvc_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_role_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_rolebinding_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_service_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_serviceaccount_test.go (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pod_test.go (no review received)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_deployment_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pvc_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_role_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_rolebinding_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_service_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_serviceaccount_test.go
Additional context used
golangci-lint
pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go
18-18: undefined: TestSuite (typecheck)
84-84: undefined: TestSuite (typecheck)
142-142: undefined: TestSuite (typecheck)
12-12: "k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes/fake" imported and not used (typecheck)
Additional comments not posted (5)
pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (5)
18-82: The implementation ofTestGetConfigMapis robust, covering multiple scenarios including successful retrieval, not found error, and client errors. Good use of table-driven tests and mock setups.Tools
golangci-lint
18-18: undefined: TestSuite (typecheck)
84-140:TestConfigMapExistseffectively tests the existence check of ConfigMaps. It handles both positive and negative cases well, including client errors.Tools
golangci-lint
84-84: undefined: TestSuite (typecheck)
142-211:TestCreateConfigMapis well-structured and covers essential scenarios including successful creation, duplicate creation, and client errors. The use of custom errors enhances the clarity of test failures.Tools
golangci-lint
142-142: undefined: TestSuite (typecheck)
213-270:TestDeleteConfigMapthoroughly tests the deletion process, including handling cases where the ConfigMap does not exist and where there are client-side errors. Consistent and clear error handling.
272-280: The helper functioncreateConfigMapis straightforward and effectively abstracts the ConfigMap creation logic used in various tests. It properly handles the creation and error return.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- pkg/builder/kaniko/kaniko.go (8 hunks)
- pkg/builder/kaniko/kaniko_test.go (5 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/knuu.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/knuu/knuu_old.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/minio/minio.go (14 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
pkg/builder/kaniko/kaniko_test.go
28-28: undefined: Kaniko (typecheck)
Additional comments not posted (5)
pkg/knuu/knuu_old.go (1)
85-86: Refactor to useKubeManagerinterface aligns with project goals.pkg/builder/kaniko/kaniko_test.go (1)
17-23: Constants and context handling adjustments improve clarity and performance.pkg/knuu/knuu.go (1)
128-135: Refactoring to useKubeManagerinMinioandKanikoinitialization enhances modularity and maintainability.pkg/builder/kaniko/kaniko.go (1)
34-36: Integration ofKubeManagerinKanikomethods is well-implemented, enhancing consistency with Kubernetes interactions.Also applies to: 47-47, 79-79, 110-110, 133-133, 143-143, 152-152
pkg/minio/minio.go (1)
45-45: Refactoring to useKubeManagerinMiniomethods is well-implemented, enhancing consistency with Kubernetes interactions.Also applies to: 61-61, 70-70, 76-76, 149-149, 248-248, 254-254, 315-315, 330-330, 354-354, 376-376, 386-386, 402-402, 428-428
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_deployment_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pod_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pvc_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_role_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_rolebinding_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_service_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_serviceaccount_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (13)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_custom_resource_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_deployment_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pod_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_pvc_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_replicaset_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_role_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_rolebinding_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_service_test.go
- pkg/k8s/k8s_serviceaccount_test.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great work! Left a few comments I think are worth cleaning up.
Also the bittwister tests are failing. I recommend capturing the failure in an issue to see if it is just a one off flaky test or if that random combination is deterministic.
Lastly, I think it would be helpful to pull all the small helpers you created in the test files into the suite_setup_test.go file. Maybe just call it test_suite_test.go or something, so that it is easy for people to find the common helpers for future tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pkg/k8s/utils.go (1)
36-63: TheSanitizeNamefunction is comprehensive and adheres to Kubernetes naming conventions. The use of regular expressions and string manipulations is appropriate. However, consider adding a comment about the constantdefaultNameOnEmptyInputto explain its purpose and usage context.pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (1)
82-138:TestConfigMapExistschecks the existence of ConfigMaps effectively. The scenarios are well thought out, including the existence, non-existence, and client error conditions. It would be beneficial to add more detailed logging within the test cases to aid in debugging when tests fail.pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go (1)
74-133:TestGetDaemonSetis well-structured, testing successful retrieval, not found, and client error scenarios. The use ofsetupMockis appropriate, and the assertions are well-placed. To improve test clarity, consider adding comments explaining the purpose of each test case, especially in complex setups.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/test_suite_test.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/utils.go (1 hunks)
- pkg/k8s/utils_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
golangci-lint
pkg/k8s/utils.go
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
pkg/k8s/utils_test.go
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
pkg/k8s/test_suite_test.go
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
pkg/k8s/k8s_namespace_test.go
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
Additional comments not posted (5)
pkg/k8s/utils.go (1)
15-18: The implementation ofisClusterEnvironmentseems correct and efficient by checking the existence of specific Kubernetes-related files to determine the environment.pkg/k8s/utils_test.go (1)
10-88: The test cases forSanitizeNameare well-structured and cover a wide range of scenarios, including edge cases. This thorough testing ensures that the function behaves correctly across different inputs. Good job on maintaining high test coverage.Tools
golangci-lint
[warning] 10-10: duplicated-imports: Package "k8s.io/api/core/v1" already imported (revive)
pkg/k8s/k8s_networkpolicy_test.go (1)
16-233: The test functions for network policy operations (TestCreateNetworkPolicy,TestDeleteNetworkPolicy,TestGetNetworkPolicy,TestNetworkPolicyExists) are well-structured and cover various scenarios, including error handling and successful operations. The use of mocks to simulate client behavior is appropriate and helps in isolating the tests. Ensure that all possible error paths are tested to improve the robustness of the tests.pkg/k8s/k8s_configmap_test.go (1)
140-209:TestCreateConfigMaphandles various scenarios including successful creation, already exists, and client errors. The structure of the tests is clear and the use of mock setups is appropriate. Consider adding a verification step to ensure that the ConfigMap is correctly stored in the fake clientset post-creation.pkg/k8s/k8s_daemonset_test.go (1)
135-225:TestCreateDaemonSetcovers the creation of DaemonSets under various conditions including successful creation and client errors. The tests are comprehensive, but the error handling could be improved by verifying that the DaemonSet is correctly added to the clientset in successful scenarios.
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
|
@coderabbitai ignore |
Actions performedComments resolved. |
|
@coderabbitai ignore Actions performedReviews paused. |
|
@coderabbitai pause |
Actions performedReviews paused. |
Closes #360
Summary by CodeRabbit