-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V2.x. Back-port PR #2334 to the v2.x branch #2581
base: v2.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## v2.x #2581 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.08% 89.98% -0.10%
==========================================
Files 113 113
Lines 5040 5038 -2
==========================================
- Hits 4540 4533 -7
- Misses 500 505 +5 |
@@ -491,3 +492,34 @@ TEMPLATE_TEST_CASE_SIG("#1954 - 7 arg template test case sig compiles", "[regres | |||
} | |||
|
|||
}} // namespace MiscTests | |||
|
|||
#if defined(CATCH_PLATFORM_WINDOWS) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test in v3 only checks with MSVC. Why the change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I certainly didn't mean to change it.
} | ||
|
||
void FatalConditionHandler::disengage_platform() { | ||
if (!RemoveVectoredExceptionHandler(exceptionHandlerHandle)) { | ||
CATCH_RUNTIME_ERROR("Could not unregister vectored exception handler"); | ||
if (SetUnhandledExceptionFilter(reinterpret_cast<LPTOP_LEVEL_EXCEPTION_FILTER>(previousTopLevelExceptionFilter)) != topLevelExceptionFilter) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Similar question: the code in v3 does not need the wild reinterpret cast. Why is it needed here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought sure I just copied the code from v3. I'll look at it no later than Monday. Thanks.
otherwise lgtm |
This PR back-ports the PR #2334 to the v2.x branch, enabling v2.x to be used with the Address Sanitizer on Windows.