Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Post feedback update lesson 4 #41

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ClementineCttn
Copy link
Collaborator

Following our collective feedback on the 3rd GDCU workshop, I have amended lesson 4 mostly to make the leaflet challenge easier, to emphasize replicability and save map as images as the end of the main exercise.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/carpentries-incubator/r-geospatial-urban/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-41

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 .DS_Store                                          | Bin 6148 -> 6148 bytes
 18-import-and-visualise-osm-data.md                |  82 ++++++++++++++++++---
 19-basic-gis-with-r-sf.md                          |  65 ++++++++--------
 4-gis-slides.html                                  |  67 ++++++++---------
 ...e-osm-data-rendered-reproducibility-1.png (new) | Bin 0 -> 75073 bytes
 ...e-osm-data-rendered-reproducibility-2.png (new) | Bin 0 -> 60216 bytes
 ...sualise-osm-data-rendered-unnamed-chunk-8-1.png | Bin 76113 -> 73520 bytes
 ...with-r-sf-rendered-unnamed-chunk-10-1.png (new) | Bin 0 -> 61756 bytes
 ...ic-gis-with-r-sf-rendered-unnamed-chunk-2-1.png | Bin 15583 -> 10950 bytes
 ...ic-gis-with-r-sf-rendered-unnamed-chunk-4-1.png | Bin 11130 -> 7462 bytes
 ...ic-gis-with-r-sf-rendered-unnamed-chunk-6-1.png | Bin 20305 -> 15887 bytes
 ...ic-gis-with-r-sf-rendered-unnamed-chunk-7-1.png | Bin 17667 -> 13009 bytes
 ...ic-gis-with-r-sf-rendered-unnamed-chunk-8-1.png | Bin 73067 -> 70399 bytes
 ...ic-gis-with-r-sf-rendered-unnamed-chunk-9-1.png | Bin 73876 -> 71288 bytes
 fig/ConservationBrielle.png (new)                  | Bin 0 -> 557050 bytes
 fig/ConservationBrielle_newrules.png (new)         | Bin 0 -> 569814 bytes
 md5sum.txt                                         |  54 +++++++-------
 17 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-05-15 13:59:14 +0000

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@cforgaci cforgaci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, @ClementineCttn! I left a couple of tiny suggestions. If you process them, we can merge the PR.

episodes/19-basic-gis-with-r-sf.Rmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
episodes/18-import-and-visualise-osm-data.Rmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
episodes/18-import-and-visualise-osm-data.Rmd Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
episodes/18-import-and-visualise-osm-data.Rmd Show resolved Hide resolved
episodes/18-import-and-visualise-osm-data.Rmd Show resolved Hide resolved
@cforgaci cforgaci assigned cforgaci and unassigned cforgaci May 1, 2024
@cforgaci
Copy link
Collaborator

cforgaci commented May 1, 2024

@ClementineCttn before you merge this PR can you please do the checks from #7 as well?

@cforgaci cforgaci requested a review from javisanmillan May 2, 2024 07:34
@cforgaci
Copy link
Collaborator

cforgaci commented May 2, 2024

@ClementineCttn, please consider #31 in your updates as well.

@cforgaci cforgaci requested a review from iurriayanez May 6, 2024 14:22
Clementine Cottineau and others added 3 commits May 13, 2024 09:54
@ClementineCttn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

All of Claudiu's comment have been resolved here and in the new small PR, including the removal of nominatimlite package, naming code chunks, etc.

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@cforgaci cforgaci left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@cforgaci cforgaci merged commit 988239c into main May 15, 2024
3 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 988239c
Branch  : main
Author  : Claudiu Forgaci <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-05-15 14:45:24 +0000
Message : Merge pull request #41 from carpentries-incubator/post-feedback-update-lesson-4

Post feedback update lesson 4
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2024
Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 4508358
Branch  : md-outputs
Author  : GitHub Actions <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-05-15 14:54:52 +0000
Message : markdown source builds

Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 988239c
Branch  : main
Author  : Claudiu Forgaci <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-05-15 14:45:24 +0000
Message : Merge pull request #41 from carpentries-incubator/post-feedback-update-lesson-4

Post feedback update lesson 4
@cforgaci cforgaci deleted the post-feedback-update-lesson-4 branch May 16, 2024 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants