CI: Add configuration for Codecov, relaxing the constraints a bit #867
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I mean, I'm okay with this, but having met 100% coverage. It's not too much to ask that new coffee just have it's own coverage too. I'm guessing will be short coverage after the py36 test drops though |
|
Sure. Will also be fine! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Chris,
if you think the CI outcome from, for example, GH-797, is annoying, you may like that kind of configuration for Codecov. Otherwise, if you like the default settings, in order to keep the stronger validation rules, feel free to reject this change.
With kind regards,
Andreas.