Skip to content
forked from zevenet/pound

Pound Load Balancer used in Zevenet ADC for HTTP and HTTPS userspace management. It includes some features developed by Zevenet Team

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

cano-devel/pound

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

37 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

POUND - REVERSE-PROXY AND LOAD-BALANCER

The Pound program is a reverse proxy, load balancer and
HTTPS front-end for Web server(s). Pound was developed
to enable distributing the load among several Web-servers
and to allow for a convenient SSL wrapper for those Web
servers that do not offer it natively. Pound is distributed
under the GPL - no warranty, it's free to use, copy and
give away.

IMPROVEMENTS

ZEVENET Dev team has added and imported some properties to
Pound Reverse-Proxy in order to offer some new
functionalities required for critical environments.
They can be checked in the git commits but the
following lines describe the most important changes:

1. Added support for HSTS headers
commit: 802f41a26c29176bf371be1b5f379a435b044648
2. Supported 100Continue headers
commit: dcbbff5b7514c267b8a9caa5c336479a99cce8d4
3. Added new Directive Name in order to log with
a higher level of detail
commit: ca007c53944377618f1d07eb93d1cb90f3eafd05
4. Poundctl counts backend established conns.
commit: 8044ed9daa966b89e031a8da05bbdf3041b33a93
5. Supported Openssl 1.0.2 Compilation
commit: 8044ed9daa966b89e031a8da05bbdf3041b33a93
6. Supported Openssl 1.1 Compilation
commit: 68b2a5a958536d04be4560806ec19f80c6e292f1
7. Supported loadbalancing with websockets
commit: 9d608feb9bca29d9d9b319a7ec35fe9eda1f15ed
8. Compatibility with Web Application Firewall (WAF) using Libmodsecurity
commit: 42600bbdaf088fddc0adf604f456c4857ea68a4a

WHAT POUND IS:

1.  a reverse-proxy: it passes requests from client
    browsers to one or more back-end servers.

2.  a load balancer: it will distribute the requests from
    the client browsers among several back-end servers,
    while keeping session information.

3.  an SSL wrapper: Pound will decrypt HTTPS requests
    from client browsers and pass them as plain HTTP
    to the back-end servers.

4.  an HTTP/HTTPS sanitizer: Pound will verify requests
    for correctness and accept only well-formed ones.

5.  a fail over-server: should a back-end server fail,
    Pound will take note of the fact and stop passing
    requests to it until it recovers.

6.  a request redirector: requests may be distributed
    among servers according to the requested URL.

Pound is a very small program, easily audited for security
problems. It can run as setuid/setgid and/or in a chroot
jail. Pound does not access the hard-disk at all (except
for reading certificate file(s) on start, if required)
and should thus pose no security threat to any machine.

WHAT POUND IS NOT:

1.  Pound is not a Web server: by itself, Pound serves no
    content - it contacts the back-end server(s) for that
    purpose.

2.  Pound is not a Web accelerator: no caching is done -
    every request is passed "as is" to a back-end server.

STATUS

As of release 1.0 Pound is declared to be production-quality code.

Quite a few people have reported using Pound successfully in production
environments. The largest volume reported to date is a site with an
average of about 30M requests per day, peaking at over 600 requests/sec.

Pound was successfully used in production with a variety of Web servers,
including Apache, IIS, Zope, WebLogic, Jakarta/Tomcat, iPlanet, etc. In
general Pound passes requests and responses back and forth unchanged,
so we have no reason to think that any web server would be incompatible.

Client browsers that were tested:

- IE 5.0/5.5 (Windows) HTTP/HTTPS

- Netscape 4.7 (Windows/Linux) HTTP/HTTPS

- Mozilla (Windows/Linux) HTTP/HTTPS

- Konqueror (Linux) HTTP/HTTPS

- Galleon (Linux) HTTP/HTTPS

- Opera (Linux/Windows) HTTP/HTTPS

- Lynx (Linux) HTTP

Given that Pound is in production and no problems were reported, we have
no reason to believe that other browsers would present a problem. A few
issues were observed with problematic SSL implementations, most notably
with Opera 6, but these should be OK in the present version.

INSTALLATION

Probably the easiest way to install Pound is to use a pre-compiled package
if you can find one. While Apsis offers no such packages, they are available
for quite a few systems (Suse, Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu), as
well as some private packages:

- RPMs for RedHat are available at http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/pound/

- A nice FreeBSD live-CD distribution is available at http://www.targeted.org as
http://www.targeted.org/files/fbsd62_pound23.iso.gz, including a Pound binary.

Failing that you should install from sources:

1.  Pound was tested on Linux, Solaris and OpenBSD, but
    it should work unchanged on just about any modern
    Unix-like system. You will require at least OpenSSL and
    libpthread. The PCRE package is strongly recommended.

    Warning: as Pound is a multi-threaded program it requires
    a version of OpenSSL with thread support. This is normally
    the case on Linux and Solaris (for example) but not on *BSD.
    If your system has the wrong library please download, compile
    and install OpenSSL (from http://www.openssl.org).

    If the PCRE package is available Pound will link against it.
    This will provide a significant performance boost.

2.  Download the current version of Pound-current file and unpack
    it. The archive is signed.
    My signature is available at http://www.apsis.ch/pound/roseg.asc.
    Alternately see below for stable versions.

    Unpack. Do the usual thing:

        ./configure

3.  The following options are available for the configure script:

    --with-ssl=ssl_dir -- OpenSSL home directory (default: system defined).

    --disable-super -- disable supervisor process (default: enabled)

    --with-t_rsa=nnn   -- timeout of the RSA ephemeral keys regeneration
    (default: 1800 seconds).

    --with-owner=owner -- name of installed binaries owner (default is
    system-dependent).

    --with-group=group -- name of installed binaries group (default is
    system-dependent).

4.  Check that the resulting Makefile is correct and possibly
    adjust flags as needed on your system. Compile:

        make

5.  If it works, you may want to do some testing before installing.

6.  Install the executable somewhere (it's likely that
    /usr/local/sbin would make a good choice), as well
    as the manual page (pound.8 -> /usr/local/man/man8).
    The supplied Makefile will do it for you.

7.  Make sure Pound gets started on boot. Read the man
    page for available options and examples.

CONFIGURATION

ZOPE

A special note for Zope users: the original intent on
developing Pound was to allow distributing the load
among several Zope servers running on top of ZEO. This
it does.

A special problem arises when you try using Pound as an
SSL wrapper: Zope assumes that the requests are made via
HTTP and insists on prepending 'http://' to the (correct)
address in the replies, including in the <base> tag and
the absolute URLs it generates (for images for example).
This is clearly an undesirable behavior.

For older Zope versions (prior to 2.7): a modified z2.py (as
well as a patch) is included in the distribution. The main
difference is that this z2.py allows starting an additional
HTTP server via the -y flag that sets the environment
HTTPS variable - thus correcting the problem. That means
that in order to use Pound as an SSL wrapper you need to:

- start Zope (modify the 'start' file) as:

    python -X -w 8080 -y 8443 ...

For Zope 2.7 or later the same effect can be achieved via suitable
modifications to zope.conf.

VIRTUAL HOSTS (IN GENERAL)

Some people asked about the possibility of redirecting requests to back-ends
as per some virtual hosts definition. While I believe this is not Pound's
job, it can be done. As of version 0.10, Pound supports filtering requests
based not only on the request URL, but also on the presence or absence of
certain headers.

Let's assume that you have internal server 192.168.0.10 that is supposed to
serve the needs of virtual host www.server0.com and 192.168.0.11 that serves
www.server1.com.  You want Pound to listen on address 1.2.3.4 and separate
the requests to each host.  The config file would look something like this:

    ListenHTTP
        Address 1.2.3.4
        Port    80

        Service
            HeadRequire "Host: .*www.server0.com.*"

            BackEnd
                Address 192.168.0.10
                Port    80
            End
        End

        Service
            HeadRequire "Host: .*www.server1.com.*"

            BackEnd
                Address 192.168.0.11
                Port    80
            End
        End
    End

(add whatever else is necessary) or, if you want even safer filtering:

    ListenHTTP
        Address 1.2.3.4
        Port    80

        Service
            HeadRequire "Host: .*www.server0.com.*"
            HeadDeny    "Host: .*www.server1.com.*"

            BackEnd
                Address 192.168.0.10
                Port    80
            End
        End

        Service
            HeadRequire "Host: .*www.server1.com.*"
            HeadDeny    "Host: .*www.server0.com.*"

            BackEnd
                Address 192.168.0.11
                Port    80
            End
        End
    End

This is NOT recommended (I personally believe that virtual hosts should be
implemented in the back-end servers - putting this in a proxy
is a major security kludge) but it works.

VIRTUAL HOSTS AND HTTPS

Quite often we get inquiries about Pound's ability to do virtual hosting
with HTTPS. In order to lay this matter to rest, let me say:

    HTTPS does not allow virtual hosting!

This is not a limitation of Pound, but of HTTPS - no Web server or proxy
are able to do it due to the nature of the beast.

In order to see why this is the case we need to look at the way HTTPS works.
Basically there are three stages in any HTTPS connection:

1.  Connection negotiation - the client (your browser) and the server (Web
    server or proxy) negotiate the basic parameters: ciphers to use, session
    key, etc.

2.  Connection authentication: at the very least the server presents the
    client with a certificate that says "I am server www.encrypted.com - and
    certificate.authority.org will verify that". The client may also present
    a certificate of its own at this stage.

3.  Request/response cycle: normal HTTP is sent (through the encrypted
    channel) back and forth.

The vital point to notice here is that connection authentication takes place
BEFORE any request was issued.

On the other hand, the way virtual hosting works is for the client to
specify in the request to which server it would like to talk. This is
accomplished via a Host header:

    GET /index.html HTTP/1.1
    Host: http://www.virthost.com

Combining the two we get to an impasse: on connection setup the server will
reply with the certificate for "www.realhost.com", but the request is really
for "www.virthost.com" - and most browsers will scream blue murder (as well
they should) if the two do not match.

There is a new twist on this however: some of the newer browsers will accept
so-called "wild-card certificates". This is a specially crafted certificate
that is not issued to a host, but rather to a domain. The result is that
on setting-up a new SSL connection, the server replies not with "I am
www.encrypted.com", but with "I am *.encrypted.com". If the browser is
capable of processing this type of certificate then the connection is
set up and normal HTTPS (with www.encrypted.com or special.encrypted.com or
even some.other.server.encrypted.com or whatever other name matches) proceeds
as usual. Pound supports these certificates and you can use virtual hosts in
the normal way.

Update June 2010: starting with the 2.6 series, Pound has SNI support, if your
OpenSSL version supports it. Basically you supply Pound with several certificates,
one for each virtual host (wild card certificates - as described above - are
allowed). On connecting the client signals to which server it wants to talk,
and Pound searches among its certificates which would fit. Not all versions
of OpenSSL and not all clients support this mode, but if available it allows
for virtual hosts over HTTPS.

An additional option is to use a semi-official TLS extension, the so called
alternate subject name. If your version of OpenSSL supports it you may specify
in one certificate several alternate server names. This requires support for a
special TLS feature, and nor all clients accept it.

VIRTUAL HOSTS IN ZOPE

For reasons I can't quite grasp, it seems that a lot of Zope
users are convinced that virtual hosts are only possible through
the Apache/VHM combination and that it requires some kind of
magic incantation at midnight in order to work (I won't even
start on the virgin sacrifices).

The simple fact is that VHM and the Apache VirtualHost directives
(as well as various tricks through mod_rewrite and mod_proxy) are
(almost) mutually exclusive: they perform exactly the same
functions and, leaving aside the logging issues, are used
independently of each other.  Let me repeat that: you may use the
VHM without Apache - just click on the VHM mappings tab and add
whatever virtual host you wish. From this moment on any request
to that host will be mapped back and forth by Zope to the required
URL. This works weather you access Zope directly or via any number
of proxies on the way, Pound included.

To test: add a new host name to your /etc/hosts file, making it an
alias for localhost - something like::

    127.0.0.1 localhost www.testhost.mine

Add a mapping in VHM from www.testhost.mine to some Zope folder
(Examples is already there). Point your browser to http://localhost
and you get the normal Zope start page; point it to
http://www.testhost.mine and you'll see the Examples starting page.
All requests are mapped correctly, and the URLs in the pages (such
as base or absoluteURL) are translated correctly in the response.

SESSIONS

Pound has the ability to keep track of sessions between a client
browser and a back-end server. Unfortunately, HTTP is defined as
a stateless protocol, which complicates matters: many schemes have
been invented to allow keeping track of sessions, none of which works
perfectly. Even worse, sessions are critical in order to allow
web-based applications to function correctly - it is vital that once
a session is established all subsequent requests from the same browser
be directed to the same back-end server.

Six possible ways of detecting a session have been implemented in
Pound (hopefully the most useful ones): by client address, by Basic
authentication (user id/password), by URL parameter, by cookie, by
HTTP parameter and by header value.

- by client address: in this scheme Pound directs all requests from
  the same client IP address to the same back-end server. Put the
  lines

  Session
    Type    IP
    TTL     300
  End

  in the configuration file to achieve this effect. The value indicates
  what period of inactivity is allowed before the session is discarded.

- by Basic Authentication: in this scheme Pound directs all requests from
  the same user (as identified in the Basic Authentication header) to the
  same back-end server. Put the lines

  Session
    Type    Basic
    TTL     300
  End

  in configuration file to achieve this effect. The value indicates what
  period of inactivity is allowed before the session is discarded.

  WARNING: given the constraints of the HTTP protocol it may very well be
  that the authenticated request will go to a different back-end server than
  the one originally requesting it. Make sure all your servers support
  the same authentication scheme!

- by URL parameter: quite often session information is passed through URL
  parameters (the browser is pointed to something like http://xxx?id=123).
  Put the lines

  Session
    Type    URL
    ID      "id"
    TTL     300
  End

  to support this scheme and the sessions will be tracked based on the value
  of the "id" parameter.

- by cookie value: applications that use this method pass a certain cookie
  back and forth. Add the lines

  Session
    Type    Cookie
    ID      "sess"
    TTL     300
  End

  to your configuration file - the sessions will be tracked by the value of
  the "sess" cookie.

- by HTTP parameter value: applications that use this method pass an HTTP
  parameter (http://x.y/z;parameter) back and forth. Add the lines

  Session
    Type    PARM
    TTL     300
  End

  to your configuration file - the sessions will be tracked by the value of
  the parameter.

- by header value: applications that use this method pass a certain header
  back and forth. Add the lines

  Session
    Type    Header
    ID      "X-sess"
    TTL     300
  End

  to your configuration file - the sessions will be tracked by the value of
  the "X-sess" header.

Please note the following restrictions on session tracking:

- session tracking is always associated with a certain Service. Thus each
  group may have other methods and parameters.

- there is no default session: if you have not defined any sessions no
  session tracking will be done.

- only one session definition is allowed per Service. If your application
  has alternative methods for sessions you will have to define a separate
  Service for each method.

A note on cookie injection: some applications have no session-tracking mechanism at
all but would still like to have the client always directed to the same back-end
time after time. Some reverse proxies use a mechanism called "cookie injection" in
order to achieve this: a cookie is added to the back-end responses and tracked by the
reverse proxy.

Pound was designed to be as transparent as possible, and this mechanism is not
supported. If you really need this sort of persistent mapping use the client address
session mechanism (Session Type IP), which achieves the same result without
changing the contents in any way.

REQUEST LOGGING

As a general rule, Pound passes all headers as they arrive from the client
browser to the back-end server(s). There are two exceptions to this rule:
Pound may add information about the SSL client certificate (as described
below), and it will add an X-Forwarded-For header. The general format is:

    X-Forwarded-for: client-IP-address

The back-end server(s) may use this extra information in order to create
their log-files with the real client address (otherwise all requests will
appear to originate from Pound itself, which is rather useless).

In addition, Pound logs requests and replies to the system log. This is
controlled by the LogLevel configuration variable (0 - no logging,
1 - normal log, 2 - full log, 3 - Apache combined log format, 4 - Apache
combined log format without virtual host).

By default the messages go to the LOG_DAEMON facility, but you can change
this in the configuration file. If you don't want to, you can just do a:

    fgrep pound /var/log/messages

to get all the messages generated by Pound.

HTTPS CERTIFICATES

If a client browser connects via HTTPS and if it presents a
certificate and if HTTPSHeaders is set, Pound will obtain the
certificate data and add the following HTTP headers to the
request it makes to the server:

- X-SSL-Subject: information about the certificate owner

- X-SSL-Issuer: information about the certificate issuer (CA)

- X-SSL-notBefore: begin validity date for the certificate

- X-SSL-notAfter: end validity date for the certificate

- X-SSL-serial: certificate serial number (in decimal)

- X-SSL-cipher: the cipher currently in use

- X-SSL-certificate: the full client certificate (multi-line)

It is the application's responsibility to actually use these
headers - Pound just passes this information without checking
it in any way (except for signature and encryption correctness).

Please note that this mechanism allows forgeries: a client may
(maliciously) send these headers to Pound in order to masquerade
as an SSL client with a specific certificate. If this is a problem
for your application make sure to deny these requests. Add:

    HeadDeny "X-SSL-Subject:.*"
    HeadDeny "X-SSL-Issuer:.*"
    HeadDeny "X-SSL-notBefore:.*"
    HeadDeny "X-SSL-notAfter:.*"
    HeadDeny "X-SSL-serial:.*"
    HeadDeny "X-SSL-cipher:.*"

within the Service(s).

THREADS AND LIMITS

A few people ran into problems when installing Pound because of the
various threading models and how they interact with system-imposed
limits. Please keep in mind the following requirements:

- on most System V derived Unices (of which Linux up to 2.4 is one),
  a thread is a process. This means that when doing a 'ps' you will see
  as many processes with the name 'pound' as there are active threads.
  Each such process uses only two file descriptors, but the system needs
  to support the required number of processes, both in total and per
  user (possibly also per process group). In bash, this is 'ulimit -u',
  in csh this is 'limit maxproc'.

- on BSD style systems all threads run in the same process space. Do
  a ps and you see a single 'pound' process. The process needs two
  file descriptors per active request (bash: 'ulimit -n', csh
  'limit maxfiles'/'limit openfiles').

- on most systems the thread library comes with a built-in limit on the
  maximal number of concurrent threads allowed - on older systems it usually
  is 1024, on newer systems quite a bit higher. In very
  rare cases (very high load and long response times) you may run into
  this limitation - the symptom is log messages saying "can't create
  thread". Your only solution is to recompile the system threads library
  (and possibly the kernel itself) with a higher limit.

Please note that your kernel needs to be configured to support the
required resources - the above are just the shell commands.

SIMILAR SYSTEMS

Quite a few people asked "What is wrong with Apache/Squid/
stunnel/your_favorite? Do we really need another proxy
system?". The simple answer is that there is nothing wrong -
they are all excellent systems that do their jobs very well.
The reasoning behind Pound is however slightly different:

- In my experience, a load-balancer may easily become a
  bottle-neck in itself. If you have a heavily loaded site,
  there are few things more depressing than seeing your
  "load-balancer" slow down the entire network. This means that
  the load-balancer should be kept as light-weight as possible.

- Security: auditing a large system for security issues is a
  major undertaking for anybody (ask Bill Gates about it). This
  implies that in order to avoid introducing new vulnerabilities
  into a system (after all, your installation is only as secure
  as its weakest component) the proxy/load-balancer should be
  kept as small as possible.

- Protection: I assume Pound will be the only component exposed
  to the Internet - your back-end servers will run in a protected
  network behind it. This means that Pound should filter requests
  and make sure only valid, correctly formed ones are passed to the
  back-end servers, thus protecting them from malicious clients.

Taking these criteria into consideration, it is easy to see why
the other systems mentioned above do not fit:

- Apache (with mod_proxy and mod_backhand): great system, but very
  large. Imposes a significant load on the system, complex set-up
  procedure (and it is so easy to get it wrong: check how many Apache
  servers allow proxying from and to external hosts). While Apache
  has proven remarkably exploit free, I wouldn't wish to go into a
  security audit for the tens of thousands of lines of code involved,
  not to mention all the additional modules.

- Squid: great caching proxy, but even should load-balancing
  features become available in the future, do you really need
  caching on the load-balancer? After all, Pound can easily run on a
  disk-less system, whereas with Squid you'd better prepare a high
  throughput RAID. Squid is still perfectly usable as a caching
  proxy between Pound and the actual Web server, should it lack
  its own cache (which Zope happily has).

- stunnel: probably comes closest to my understanding of software
  design (does one job only and does it very well). However, it
  lacks the load balancing and HTTP filtering features that I
  considered necessary. Using stunnel in front of Pound (for HTTPS)
  would have made sense, except that integrating HTTPS into Pound
  proved to be so simple that it was not worth the trouble.

- your favourite system: let me know how it looks in light of the
  above criteria - I am always interested in new ideas.

DEDICATED SERVERS

Some people asked about the possibility of dedicating specific
back-end servers to some clients - in other words, if a request
originates from a certain IP address or group of addresses then
it should be sent to a specific group of back-end servers.

Given the ease with which IP addresses can be forged I am personally
doubtful of the utility of such a feature. Even should you think it
desirable, it is probably best implemented via the packet filter,
rather than a proxy server. Assuming that requests from x.com are
to go to s1.local, requests from y.com to s2.local and everything
else to s3.local and s4.local, here is how to do it:

- make sure your firewall blocks requests to port 8080, 8081 and 8082

- configure Pound as follows:

    ListenHTTP
        Address 127.0.0.1
        Port    8080

        Service
            BackEnd
                Address s1.local
                Port    80
            End
        End
    End

    ListenHTTP
        Address 127.0.0.1
        Port    8081

        Service
            BackEnd
                Address s2.local
                Port    80
            End
        End
    End

    ListenHTTP
        Address 127.0.0.1
        Port    8082

        Service
            BackEnd
                Address s3.local
                Port    80
            End
            BackEnd
                Address s4.local
                Port    80
            End
        End
    End

- have your packet filter redirect requests to the right local ports
  based on the origin address. In OpenBSD pf syntax this would be
  something like:

    rdr on rl0 from x.com to myhost.com port 80 -> localhost port 8080
    rdr on rl0 from y.com to myhost.com port 80 -> localhost port 8081
    rdr on rl0 from any to myhost.com port 80 -> localhost port 8082

  or in Linux iptables::

    iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s x.com --dport 80 -i eth0 \
        -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:8080
    iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s y.com --dport 80 -i eth0 \
        -j DNAT --to 127.0.0.1:8081
    iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -i eth0 -j DNAT \
        --to 127.0.0.1:8082

This would give you the desired effect and probably better
performance than a purely proxy-based solution (though the
performance improvement is debatable, at least on Linux).

WebDAV

As of version 1.0 Pound supports the full WebDAV command-set. In
fact, it has been tested and is known to (almost) work with the
Microsoft Outlook Web Gateway, which is quite remarkable given that
Microsoft's own proxy does not.

Regrettably, Microsoft adherence to standards leaves something to be
desired: they decided to add some characters to their URLs - thus
breaking a whole set of RFC's.

Rather then change Pound to accept these characters (which could create
some serious issues with security on other systems) we have made this
behaviour dependent on a configuration switch: xHTTP (see the man page
for details).

If you also use the SSL wrapper feature in front of a Microsoft server
you should probably also add 'AddHeader "Front-End-Https: on"'.

These changes are also required to access a Subversion server via
Pound.

WEB APPLICATION FIREWALL, WAF

Libmodsecurity has been integrated with Pound, in order to analyze the incoming traffic and defending the servers of possible HTTP attacks. This feature allows configuring security policies and denying the service for the non-desire requests.

Some protections rules are available in the [owasp-modsecurity-crs] (https://github.com/SpiderLabs/owasp-modsecurity-crs) project

A benchmark analyze and comparison with Nginx has been done with the following results:

Pound has been configured for inspecting the incoming traffic with Libmodsecurity and forwarding it to the backend. The test was repeated for Nginx using Libmodsecurity, the results are exposed here.

Host machine, load balancer: CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5, 3.5GHz with 8 cores

The stress tool command: wrk -c 20 -d 20 -t 10 http://127.0.0.1/index.html

The red cells are showing the CPU is over the 90% Benchmark

Graph

Pound and Nginx converge at the same point, they have the same bottleneck. Pound, being more light, has a better performance when it is not overloaded.

OTHER ISSUES

The following problems were reported by various people who use pound:

- delays in loading pages when the client browser is IE 5.5 (possibly
  limited to W2K/XP). It seems that IE opens exactly 4 connections (sockets)
  to the server and keeps them open until some time-out or until the server
  closes the connection. This works fine, unless you redirect IE to another
  server - given that all 4 sockets are used IE waits for a while before
  the redirect is actually performed.

  Solution: use the directive "Client 1" to ensure that Pound closes
  sockets very early, thus freeing the necessary resources. Experiment with
  the time-out - as it may cause problems with slow connections.

- Pound fails to start; HTTPS is enabled and the message "can't read
  private key from file xxx" appears in the log.

  Solution: make sure that the certificate file includes:

  - (optional) a chain of certificates from a known certificate authority to
    your server certificate

  - the server certificate

  - the private key; the key may NOT be password-protected

  The file should be in PEM format. The OpenSSL command to generate a
  self-signed certificate in the correct format would be something like::

    openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:1024 -keyout test.pem -out test.pem \
        -days 365 -nodes

  Note the '-nodes' flag - it's important!

- Pound fails to operate correctly with SSL when RootJail is specified.
  Solution: OpenSSL requires access to /dev/urandom, so make sure such a
  device is accessible from the root jail directory. Thus if your root
  jail is something like /var/pound:

    mkdir /var/pound/dev
    mknod /var/pound/dev/urandom c 1 9

  or whatever major/minor number are appropriate for your system.

- In chroot mode logging may stop functioning.
  Solution: make sure /dev and the root jail are on the same filesystem
  and create a hard link in the root jail to /dev/log:

    mkdir /chroot/jail/dev
    ln /dev/log /chroot/jail/dev/log

  Alternately you can have syslog (or syslog-ng) listen on another
  socket - see the man page for details.

- In chroot mode name resolution (and especially redirects) may stop
  functioning.  Solution: make sure your resolver works correctly in the
  jail. You probably need copies of /etc/resolv.conf and (at least part)
  of /etc/hosts. Depending on your system additional files may be required
  check your resolver man page for details. Should name resolution fail the
  translation of host names to IP addresses would fail, thereby defeating
  the mechanism Pound uses to identify when should a Redirect be rewritten.

- IE 5.x fails to work (correctly or at all) with Pound in HTTPS mode.
  Solution: define the supported OpenSSL ciphers for IE compatibility (this
  is really a work-around for a known IE bug):

  Ciphers "ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL"

  (Thanks to Andi Roedl for the tip).

- Linux-specific: some people use various redundant Pound solutions for
  Linux which require Pound instances on separate machines to bind to the
  same address. The default configuration of Linux does not allow a
  program to bind() to non-local addresses, which may cause a problem.
  Solution: add

    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_nonlocal_bind

  in your start-up script, or just set

    net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1

  in /etc/sysctl.conf (if you have one).

  (Thanks to RUne Saetre for the suggestion).

PROJECT INFO

COPYRIGHT

Pound is copyrighted by Apsis GmbH and is distributed under
the terms of the GNU Public License with the additional
exemption that compiling, linking, and/or using OpenSSL is
allowed. Basically, this means that you can use it free of
charge, copy it, distribute it (provided the copyright is
maintained and the full package is distributed), modify it,
or line a bird-cage with it.

We would be happy to hear from you if you use it and
suggestions and improvements are gladly accepted.

MAILING LIST

Pound has its own mailing list now: please send a message with
the subject "subscribe" to [email protected] in order to
subscribe. You will receive confirmation and instructions in
the reply.

All messages are available and indexed (searcheable) in the
archive http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list.

The mailing list is the primary support forum for Pound - please
post there any questions you may have. The developpers' address is
given here for information purposes only.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Albert (of Alacra) for investigating and writing the TCP_NODELAY code.

Luuk de Boer did some serious testing and debugging of the WebDAV
code for Microsoft servers.

Alession Cervellin packages and makes available Solaris packages for
various Pound versions.

David Couture found some nasty, lurking bugs, as well as contributing
some serious testing on big hardware.

Frank Denis contributed a few excellent code patches and some good ideas.

Dmitriy Dvoinikov makes available a live-CD FreeBSD distribution that
includes a Pound binary.

Abner G. Jacobsen did a lot of testing in a production environment
and contributed some very nice ideas.

Akira Higuchi found a significant security issue in Pound and contributed
the code to fix it.

Ken Lalonde contributed very useful remarks and suggestions, as well as
correcting a few code errors.

Phil Lodwick contributed essential parts of the high-availability code and
came up with some good ideas. In addition, did some serious testing under
heavy loads.

Simon Matter packages and makes available RPMs for various Pound versions.

Jan-Piet Mens raised some interesting security points about the HTTPS
implementation and brought the original idea for SSL header filtering.

Andreas Roedl for testing and some ideas about logging in root jails.

Gurkan Sengun tested Pound on Solaris, contributed the Solaris cc flags
and makes a Solaris pre-compiled version available on his Web-site
(www.linuks.mine.nu)

Shinji Tanaka contributed a patch for controlling logging to disk files.
This is available at http://www.hatena-inc.co.jp/~stanaka/pound/

Jim Washington contributed the code for WebDAV and tested it.

Maxime Yve discovered a nasty bug in the session tracking code and
contributed the patch to fix it.

All the others who tested Pound and told me about their results.

About

Pound Load Balancer used in Zevenet ADC for HTTP and HTTPS userspace management. It includes some features developed by Zevenet Team

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • C 73.6%
  • Python 13.3%
  • Roff 10.2%
  • Shell 1.3%
  • Other 1.6%