You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In Optimize, we segregate Zeebe data per test by applying an index prefix to the exported data unique to a given test. With EZE, the configuration must be supplied up front, meaning that an engine instance can't be shared across classes with a dynamic exporter prefix, like we currently do. It also means that we might not be able to reliably/easily clean up the data specific to a given test, as it can't be identified by its prefix.
If EZE is performant enough, then we are also completely open to having a new EZE instance started per test rather than per class, with the prefix determined up front at the start of the test.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If EZE is performant enough, then we are also completely open to having a new EZE instance started per test rather than per class, with the prefix determined up front at the start of the test.
@Zelldon - benchmarks look good, thanks for the link 👍. We're coming from a place of quite bad performance at the mo with how our tests are set up, so this would potentially be a very nice improvement. I think the prefixing is the bigger issue here then, to allow us to isolate the data for a given test
In Optimize, we segregate Zeebe data per test by applying an index prefix to the exported data unique to a given test. With EZE, the configuration must be supplied up front, meaning that an engine instance can't be shared across classes with a dynamic exporter prefix, like we currently do. It also means that we might not be able to reliably/easily clean up the data specific to a given test, as it can't be identified by its prefix.
If EZE is performant enough, then we are also completely open to having a new EZE instance started per test rather than per class, with the prefix determined up front at the start of the test.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: