Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linux arm64 launcher required for Mac users #788

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

gogolok
Copy link
Contributor

@gogolok gogolok commented Nov 17, 2024

When a Mac users exports the artifacts built by the builder, the launcher executable packaged into an OCI image must be linux arm64 in the tutorial.

I've tried to follow this tutorial on a Apple M1.

@gogolok gogolok requested a review from a team as a code owner November 17, 2024 23:24
When a Mac users exports the artifacts built by the `builder`, the
`launcher` executable packaged into an OCI image must be linux arm64 in
the tutorial.

Signed-off-by: Robert Gogolok <[email protected]>
@gogolok gogolok force-pushed the linux_arm64_launcher_required branch from f5aa889 to 37d65f3 Compare November 17, 2024 23:24
Copy link
Member

@AidanDelaney AidanDelaney left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really appreciate this attention to detail! Will add it to our documentation testing.

@AidanDelaney AidanDelaney merged commit ae50e3b into buildpacks:main Nov 19, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
When a Mac users exports the artifacts built by the `builder`, the
`launcher` executable packaged into an OCI image must be linux arm64 in
the tutorial.

Signed-off-by: Robert Gogolok <[email protected]>
@gogolok gogolok deleted the linux_arm64_launcher_required branch November 19, 2024 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants