Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve marker assignment logic and refactor graph constructor #148

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Improve marker assignment logic and refactor graph constructor #148

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
0234c47
Move graph converter
JustusAdam Apr 30, 2024
d5f05d2
Refactor and update the marker assignment logic
JustusAdam Apr 30, 2024
f83ddb6
Merge branch 'main' into refactor-graph-constructor
JustusAdam May 1, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
741 changes: 741 additions & 0 deletions crates/paralegal-flow/src/ana/graph_converter.rs
View file
Open in desktop

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions crates/paralegal-flow/src/ana/inline_judge.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
use crate::{utils::FnResolution, AnalysisCtrl, MarkerCtx, TyCtxt};

#[derive(Clone)]
/// The interpretation of marker placement as it pertains to inlining and inline
/// elision.
///
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -38,4 +39,8 @@ impl<'tcx> InlineJudge<'tcx> {
pub fn should_inline(&self, function: FnResolution<'tcx>) -> bool {
self.analysis_control.use_recursive_analysis() && !self.function_has_markers(function)
}

pub fn marker_ctx(&self) -> &MarkerCtx<'tcx> {
&self.marker_ctx
}
}
Loading
Loading