Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First draft of BPMN Icon Extension #1

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

First draft of BPMN Icon Extension #1

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

falko
Copy link
Member

@falko falko commented Dec 13, 2023

I tried to capture the discussion of today's meeting in an example and a design description. From here we could start an XML schema and specification text.

@falko falko requested a review from SimonRinguette December 13, 2023 17:14
@falko
Copy link
Member Author

falko commented Dec 13, 2023

@barmac what do you think?

@falko
Copy link
Member Author

falko commented Dec 13, 2023

@bastiankoerber does this help you?

@falko falko requested a review from barmac December 13, 2023 17:40
@barmac
Copy link
Collaborator

barmac commented Dec 14, 2023

While the structure is clever, and XSD-compliant, the relationship does not seem to be the correct element for such extensions. So I'd classify this as a workaround.

@falko
Copy link
Member Author

falko commented Dec 20, 2023

You are right: This is the least painful workaround that is possible with the current BPMN schema. However, it's also not completely outside the scope of relations. I have created a test case to ensure that SCE allows extension elements in it's top-level DI container and a future BPMN revision could adopt that in it's schema.

@falko
Copy link
Member Author

falko commented Dec 12, 2024

After another evaluation, @barmac and I concluded to keep <bpmn:relationship type="icons"> as the container for the icons.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants